<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Bleak Future for Telecom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/12/12/a-bleak-future-for-telecom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/12/a-bleak-future-for-telecom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:29:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Like That Little Engine, Nokia Siemens Thinks It Can Make It</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/12/a-bleak-future-for-telecom/#comment-155162</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Like That Little Engine, Nokia Siemens Thinks It Can Make It]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=32123#comment-155162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the positive by all means, but the title amounts to wishful thinking, especially given the incredible difficulties the entire telecommunication equipment market faces. Remember Nortel? Like that &#8220;Little [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the positive by all means, but the title amounts to wishful thinking, especially given the incredible difficulties the entire telecommunication equipment market faces. Remember Nortel? Like that &#8220;Little [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nokia&#8217;s U.S. Disappearing Act Continues</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/12/a-bleak-future-for-telecom/#comment-155161</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nokia&#8217;s U.S. Disappearing Act Continues]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=32123#comment-155161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] write-down of Nokia Siemens Networks wasn&#8217;t entirely surprising &#8212; as Om noted nearly a year ago, the recession has hit the entire telecom industry hard by forcing network operators to pay off [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] write-down of Nokia Siemens Networks wasn&#8217;t entirely surprising &#8212; as Om noted nearly a year ago, the recession has hit the entire telecom industry hard by forcing network operators to pay off [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My TelecomHUB Presentation &#124; Technology Frontiers</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/12/a-bleak-future-for-telecom/#comment-155160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[My TelecomHUB Presentation &#124; Technology Frontiers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=32123#comment-155160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This is true if you fail to recognize just how great it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is true if you fail to recognize just how great it&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nokia: Profits Down 90%, But At Least We&#8217;ve Hit Bottom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/12/a-bleak-future-for-telecom/#comment-155159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nokia: Profits Down 90%, But At Least We&#8217;ve Hit Bottom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=32123#comment-155159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in January. That&#8217;s bad news for the telecommunications equipment makers, who have so far been hard hit by the credit crunch. AT&amp;T has said it would rein in capital spending in 2009 as have other operators.    [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in January. That&#8217;s bad news for the telecommunications equipment makers, who have so far been hard hit by the credit crunch. AT&amp;T has said it would rein in capital spending in 2009 as have other operators.    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM Spring Cleaning: Motorola and Others Hit the Dustbin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/12/a-bleak-future-for-telecom/#comment-155158</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigaOM Spring Cleaning: Motorola and Others Hit the Dustbin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=32123#comment-155158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] We know it just won a big Chinese equipment contract, but the company is still finding its way in a difficult environment. It&#8217;s all pretty [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We know it just won a big Chinese equipment contract, but the company is still finding its way in a difficult environment. It&#8217;s all pretty [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nortel to Cut 3,200 More Workers</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/12/a-bleak-future-for-telecom/#comment-155157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nortel to Cut 3,200 More Workers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=32123#comment-155157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] costs. But while Nortel also went into bankruptcy with more cash on hand than is typical, amid such tough times for the telecommunications industry, the company may still end up as a subsidiary of a larger company or be sold off in bits.    [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] costs. But while Nortel also went into bankruptcy with more cash on hand than is typical, amid such tough times for the telecommunications industry, the company may still end up as a subsidiary of a larger company or be sold off in bits.    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slowdown Hits Telecom Gear Makers Hard &#124; Telecom Update</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/12/a-bleak-future-for-telecom/#comment-155156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Slowdown Hits Telecom Gear Makers Hard &#124; Telecom Update]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=32123#comment-155156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] On their call with analysts, AT&amp;T executives indicated they were feeling the pressure in the small-to-medium enterprise segments of their high-margin legacy voice and data services business. Even retail business lines fell 4.3 percent for the full-year 2008 period. And as AT&amp;T gets tight-fisted with its dollars, its suppliers, such as Adtran, are feeling the squeeze. (Related posts: Trouble Returns to the Land of Telecom and A Bleak Future for Telecom) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On their call with analysts, AT&amp;T executives indicated they were feeling the pressure in the small-to-medium enterprise segments of their high-margin legacy voice and data services business. Even retail business lines fell 4.3 percent for the full-year 2008 period. And as AT&amp;T gets tight-fisted with its dollars, its suppliers, such as Adtran, are feeling the squeeze. (Related posts: Trouble Returns to the Land of Telecom and A Bleak Future for Telecom) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Nortel Bankruptcy Could Lead to a Deal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/12/a-bleak-future-for-telecom/#comment-155155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Nortel Bankruptcy Could Lead to a Deal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=32123#comment-155155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Higginbotham  &#124; Wednesday, January 14, 2009 &#124; 5:58 AM PT &#124; 0 comments    In a sign of the troubled telecommunications industry, Toronto&#8217;s Globe and Mail is reporting that equipment maker Nortel ( s NT) plans to file for [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Higginbotham  | Wednesday, January 14, 2009 | 5:58 AM PT | 0 comments    In a sign of the troubled telecommunications industry, Toronto&#8217;s Globe and Mail is reporting that equipment maker Nortel ( s NT) plans to file for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGuire&#8217;s Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Business Observations: December 19, 2008 Edition</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/12/a-bleak-future-for-telecom/#comment-155154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[McGuire&#8217;s Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Business Observations: December 19, 2008 Edition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=32123#comment-155154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A Bleak Future for Telecom [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Bleak Future for Telecom [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Bright Future for New Telecom &#124; Voip Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/12/a-bleak-future-for-telecom/#comment-155153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Bright Future for New Telecom &#124; Voip Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=32123#comment-155153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] due to the Near Future of VoIP series, but this morning I caught Om Malik&#8217;s piece on the bleak future of telecom via Techmeme. The story reminded me that - contrary to Om&#8217;s statements - telecom does have a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] due to the Near Future of VoIP series, but this morning I caught Om Malik&#8217;s piece on the bleak future of telecom via Techmeme. The story reminded me that &#8211; contrary to Om&#8217;s statements &#8211; telecom does have a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/12/a-bleak-future-for-telecom/#comment-155152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=32123#comment-155152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, I just want to add to the comments about ALU - they have the largest IMS deployments out there, and are thigh deep in the WiMax... They are in a very good position..for a crocodile type dinosaur.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I just want to add to the comments about ALU &#8211; they have the largest IMS deployments out there, and are thigh deep in the WiMax&#8230; They are in a very good position..for a crocodile type dinosaur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/12/a-bleak-future-for-telecom/#comment-155151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=32123#comment-155151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Om...I disagree with your assessment that telecom is BLEAK. Seriously, what does telecom even mean anymore? Therein lies the issue at hand, ATT is cutting legacy jobs and bloat, it probably needed to shed since the 80s. ALU is also cutting its legacy jobs, for products that dont make sense anymore. Nortel made the mistake of trying to leverage its legacy equipment for far too long, I could have called it 10 years ago when the first softswitches started being deployed. The CS2K is a joke! So where innovation has stifled, its bleak, but we are innovating in telecom. ATT and ALU are both adding jobs where they are innovating.

Telecom is not voice in a can anymore. Telecom the word might be headed for dead, maybe we should call it UltraCommunications - or UltraCom - many of us (big and small companies alike) are working to merge and seamlessly manage all the different ways people communicate through the various networks that are available to us. We also dont just communicate with other people anymore, we communicate with applications also!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om&#8230;I disagree with your assessment that telecom is BLEAK. Seriously, what does telecom even mean anymore? Therein lies the issue at hand, ATT is cutting legacy jobs and bloat, it probably needed to shed since the 80s. ALU is also cutting its legacy jobs, for products that dont make sense anymore. Nortel made the mistake of trying to leverage its legacy equipment for far too long, I could have called it 10 years ago when the first softswitches started being deployed. The CS2K is a joke! So where innovation has stifled, its bleak, but we are innovating in telecom. ATT and ALU are both adding jobs where they are innovating.</p>
<p>Telecom is not voice in a can anymore. Telecom the word might be headed for dead, maybe we should call it UltraCommunications &#8211; or UltraCom &#8211; many of us (big and small companies alike) are working to merge and seamlessly manage all the different ways people communicate through the various networks that are available to us. We also dont just communicate with other people anymore, we communicate with applications also!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjgraves</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/12/a-bleak-future-for-telecom/#comment-155150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mjgraves]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=32123#comment-155150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those who offer traditional services will surely suffer as the value of those services is in decline, and the subscriber numbers are dropping. Bye bye land lines, and the profits they provided.

What have these companies done to provide innovative new services? Most wouldn&#039;t offer anything that undercut their traditional revenue streams. So they did effectively nothing. Catch 22.

The risk averse are ultimately rewarded appropriately.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who offer traditional services will surely suffer as the value of those services is in decline, and the subscriber numbers are dropping. Bye bye land lines, and the profits they provided.</p>
<p>What have these companies done to provide innovative new services? Most wouldn&#8217;t offer anything that undercut their traditional revenue streams. So they did effectively nothing. Catch 22.</p>
<p>The risk averse are ultimately rewarded appropriately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Bright Future for New Telecom &#124; Smith On VoIP - VoIP Insights, Micro-Analysis and Speculation</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/12/a-bleak-future-for-telecom/#comment-155149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Bright Future for New Telecom &#124; Smith On VoIP - VoIP Insights, Micro-Analysis and Speculation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=32123#comment-155149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] due to the Near Future of VoIP series, but this morning I caught Om Malik&#8217;s piece on the bleak future of telecom via Techmeme. The story reminded me that - contrary to Om&#8217;s statements - telecom does have a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] due to the Near Future of VoIP series, but this morning I caught Om Malik&#8217;s piece on the bleak future of telecom via Techmeme. The story reminded me that &#8211; contrary to Om&#8217;s statements &#8211; telecom does have a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heartburn Chuckle: The telecom industry can blame itself &#124; Signal to Noise</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/12/a-bleak-future-for-telecom/#comment-155148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heartburn Chuckle: The telecom industry can blame itself &#124; Signal to Noise]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=32123#comment-155148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] pal Om Malik writes this weekend about the layoff woes at Alcatel-Lucent and the delisting danger at Nortel, many of us [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pal Om Malik writes this weekend about the layoff woes at Alcatel-Lucent and the delisting danger at Nortel, many of us [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Screen Sleuth</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/12/a-bleak-future-for-telecom/#comment-155147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Screen Sleuth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=32123#comment-155147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David H.: Exactly. New ideas will actually be heard now, because large companies can&#039;t drown them out by buying them over or saturating venues with advertising, like they&#039;re used to doing. It could be one of most innovative times in history for tech and ideas, potentially.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David H.: Exactly. New ideas will actually be heard now, because large companies can&#8217;t drown them out by buying them over or saturating venues with advertising, like they&#8217;re used to doing. It could be one of most innovative times in history for tech and ideas, potentially.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

