<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrome&#8217;s Extensions: The Missing Piece for Google Apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/12/03/chromes-extensions-the-missing-piece-for-google-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/03/chromes-extensions-the-missing-piece-for-google-apps/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google App Engine Announces Pricing</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/03/chromes-extensions-the-missing-piece-for-google-apps/#comment-928701</link>
		<dc:creator>Google App Engine Announces Pricing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=30854#comment-928701</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] App Engine a paid service is another step toward establishing the developer ecosystem we described in December. While Google wouldn&#8217;t confirm our suspicions, Koomen did point out that it&#8217;s possible [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] App Engine a paid service is another step toward establishing the developer ecosystem we described in December. While Google wouldn&#8217;t confirm our suspicions, Koomen did point out that it&#8217;s possible [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkOnTheRun &#187; Blog Archive Google Chrome Browser for Mac, Linux by mid-2009 &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/03/chromes-extensions-the-missing-piece-for-google-apps/#comment-921372</link>
		<dc:creator>jkOnTheRun &#187; Blog Archive Google Chrome Browser for Mac, Linux by mid-2009 &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=30854#comment-921372</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] lack of extension support, but that appears to be progressing faster than a Mac or Linux browser. Google has already announced a framework for extensions that allow developers to design and implement custom features or functions. Just last week, they [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lack of extension support, but that appears to be progressing faster than a Mac or Linux browser. Google has already announced a framework for extensions that allow developers to design and implement custom features or functions. Just last week, they [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Chrome, Out of Beta. Will That Be Enough? - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/03/chromes-extensions-the-missing-piece-for-google-apps/#comment-917530</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Chrome, Out of Beta. Will That Be Enough? - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=30854#comment-917530</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] this month, Google launched its extension framework for Chrome, which we pointed out was a way for the company to tie the browser into apps that run on Google’s App Engine. In other [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this month, Google launched its extension framework for Chrome, which we pointed out was a way for the company to tie the browser into apps that run on Google’s App Engine. In other [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Newland &#124; Chrome gets extensions &#124; Cameron Newland</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/03/chromes-extensions-the-missing-piece-for-google-apps/#comment-916593</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Newland &#124; Chrome gets extensions &#124; Cameron Newland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=30854#comment-916593</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Chrome’s Extensions: The Missing Piece for Google Apps - GigaOM  Friday, December 5th, 2008 Technology, The Web [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chrome’s Extensions: The Missing Piece for Google Apps &#8211; GigaOM  Friday, December 5th, 2008 Technology, The Web [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google prepared to put all the meat in the spit &#124; Bitcurrent</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/03/chromes-extensions-the-missing-piece-for-google-apps/#comment-916417</link>
		<dc:creator>Google prepared to put all the meat in the spit &#124; Bitcurrent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=30854#comment-916417</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] wrote a piece for GigaOm on the gradually forming Google strategy for applications. Here&#8217;s the short version: Google [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote a piece for GigaOm on the gradually forming Google strategy for applications. Here&#8217;s the short version: Google [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El navegador como sistema operativo: segundo asalto &#187; El Blog de Enrique Dans</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/03/chromes-extensions-the-missing-piece-for-google-apps/#comment-916322</link>
		<dc:creator>El navegador como sistema operativo: segundo asalto &#187; El Blog de Enrique Dans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 10:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=30854#comment-916322</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] No, no ha eliminado el sistema operativo. La función del sistema operativo, la de gestionar los recursos de la máquina, sigue estando ahí. Es un trabajo sucio, pero alguien tiene que hacerlo. Pero la experiencia del usuario y progresivamente una mayor parte de sus tareas son gestionadas por el navegador, que es donde se sitúa el panorama competitivo, relegando al sistema operativo a ofrecer seguridad y solidez a cambio del consumo de los menos recursos posibles. Sistema operativo reducido al mínimo, navegador que engorda y se encarga de gestionar, mediante Gears y aplicaciones afines, cuestiones como el comportamiento de las aplicaciones según el estado de la conectividad, además de las aplicaciones en sí y su compatibilidad a través de las diferentes plataformas. Prácticamente un kernel Linux comprimido entre el hardware y el navegador. La nueva competencia ya no es entre Windows, Linux u OSX, sino entre MSIE, Firefox, Chrome, Safari u Opera. Un escenario diferente, para una batalla muy interesante, para la que Google parece además estar dispuesto a armarse muy bien cuidando los cuatro puntos básicos: [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No, no ha eliminado el sistema operativo. La función del sistema operativo, la de gestionar los recursos de la máquina, sigue estando ahí. Es un trabajo sucio, pero alguien tiene que hacerlo. Pero la experiencia del usuario y progresivamente una mayor parte de sus tareas son gestionadas por el navegador, que es donde se sitúa el panorama competitivo, relegando al sistema operativo a ofrecer seguridad y solidez a cambio del consumo de los menos recursos posibles. Sistema operativo reducido al mínimo, navegador que engorda y se encarga de gestionar, mediante Gears y aplicaciones afines, cuestiones como el comportamiento de las aplicaciones según el estado de la conectividad, además de las aplicaciones en sí y su compatibilidad a través de las diferentes plataformas. Prácticamente un kernel Linux comprimido entre el hardware y el navegador. La nueva competencia ya no es entre Windows, Linux u OSX, sino entre MSIE, Firefox, Chrome, Safari u Opera. Un escenario diferente, para una batalla muy interesante, para la que Google parece además estar dispuesto a armarse muy bien cuidando los cuatro puntos básicos: [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pot</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/12/03/chromes-extensions-the-missing-piece-for-google-apps/#comment-916241</link>
		<dc:creator>Pot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=30854#comment-916241</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;App Engine is a JOKE! seriously. I mean they have released like 0.5% of their big table technology and expect ppl to do work arounds.. Its a piece of crap. Not useful beyond toy &quot;guestbook&quot; apps.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>App Engine is a JOKE! seriously. I mean they have released like 0.5% of their big table technology and expect ppl to do work arounds.. Its a piece of crap. Not useful beyond toy &#8220;guestbook&#8221; apps.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
