<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Quick Peek at the Internet Growth Charts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/11/24/a-quick-peek-at-the-internet-growth-charts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/24/a-quick-peek-at-the-internet-growth-charts/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:45:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is There Such a Thing As a Better Broadband Cap?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/24/a-quick-peek-at-the-internet-growth-charts/#comment-941544</link>
		<dc:creator>Is There Such a Thing As a Better Broadband Cap?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 20:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=30141#comment-941544</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] or metering plan encourages them to think of bandwidth as a scarce resource. For most providers, it&#8217;s not. ISPs want to price broadband like a precious metal, but few seem willing to accept their [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or metering plan encourages them to think of bandwidth as a scarce resource. For most providers, it&#8217;s not. ISPs want to price broadband like a precious metal, but few seem willing to accept their [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Does 2009 Hold For My Business? &#171; Busy Biz Wiz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/24/a-quick-peek-at-the-internet-growth-charts/#comment-914795</link>
		<dc:creator>What Does 2009 Hold For My Business? &#171; Busy Biz Wiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=30141#comment-914795</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] isn&#8217;t all that bad &#8230; for some of us.  If you&#8217;ve been working for the corporate world and investing every penny into your 401k and stock options, you should probably take another look [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] isn&#8217;t all that bad &#8230; for some of us.  If you&#8217;ve been working for the corporate world and investing every penny into your 401k and stock options, you should probably take another look [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/24/a-quick-peek-at-the-internet-growth-charts/#comment-914543</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=30141#comment-914543</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Odlyzko underestimates Internet traffic because he only measures at public peering points. The Nemertes study looks at both public and private peering points, and concludes that growth at private exchanges is faster. The Nemertes model of future growth is controversial, but their estimate of current traffic is much more thorough than Odlyzko&#039;s.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Odlyzko needs to correct his flawed methodology before making such sweeping claims.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Odlyzko underestimates Internet traffic because he only measures at public peering points. The Nemertes study looks at both public and private peering points, and concludes that growth at private exchanges is faster. The Nemertes model of future growth is controversial, but their estimate of current traffic is much more thorough than Odlyzko&#8217;s.</p>

<p>Odlyzko needs to correct his flawed methodology before making such sweeping claims.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
