1 Comment

Summary:

In a break from traditional conference etiquette, executives from Google (NSDQ: GOOG), Symbian and Nokia (NYSE: NOK), faced off today at the…

In a break from traditional conference etiquette, executives from Google (NSDQ: GOOG), Symbian and Nokia (NYSE: NOK), faced off today at the Open Mobile Summit in San Francisco, and let it be known exactly how they feel about each other. They even picked on Microsoft (NSDQ: MSFT), despite the fact that they weren’t there to defend themselves. All of this happened to the delight of the audience, who did all they could to encourage the behavior by whistling and applauding with each stab that was made. The comments ranged from discreet to blunt, but clearly emphasize how competitive this market is getting. The main participants were: Google’s group mobile manager Rich Miner, Symbian’s VP Jerry Panagrossi, and even a little bit came from Nokia’s EVP of corporate development office Mary McDowell. The crescendo came near the end with Symbian’s Panagrossi and Google’s Miner participating in a panel with executives from *Intel*, WindRiver and Access caught in the cross-fire.

Privacy on Google’s Android vs. Symbian’s OS: Miner took an early a shot at Symbian, saying that it has security issues because once an application is installed on a handset, it has access to the phone’s entire file system, whereas on Android the environment is more segmented and an application has limited access. Panagrossi took offense at what he called “the attack” and fired back by saying that wasn’t true. He said Symbian is even more effective at managing privacy. Not only are there file-level security measures in place, Symbian also provides APIs to operators so that they can control what the app has access to, which can often be critical if the operator is in a country with strict laws. Panel participant Access VP Larry Berkin stepped in to moderate by saying that Panagrossi was correct.

The debate on free operating systems vs. licensing models: This is where it really got heated. In order to understand the context, you have to know that Google’s Android is free and open source; Symbian’s in the process of opening up its software and making it free; and Microsoft currently charges a fee per handset for its operating system. Miner: “I wouldn’t want to be in the business today of charging for the OS. But they [Microsoft] aren’t in a position to flip it to open because they don’t have another economic model. But going forward, there’s going to be pressure on trying to add $10 to a handset.” But the argument was thrown back in Miner’s face. Berkin asked Miner how much T-Mobile USA had to pay to get the first Android device to market and added that the real cost of open source can be much greater than a license fee. Miner said T-Mobile was happy in the end. Berkin queried the audience to see if there was anyone from T-Mobile that could vouch for this… With the attention turned to Android, Panagrossi suggested it may end up being a niche play just like Linux is in the laptop market: “There’s a huge market, and both models will survive. Just because Linux is free, doesn’t mean it’s the best or that it will be pervasive. It’s license vs. labor.” At this point the crowd was laughing and clapping. Miner took the mic to get the final words in: “That’s not a fair analogy. No one did a good job on the consumer experience in the computer world. It’s just like Symbian…It had both Series 60 and UIQ, which confused developers and didn’t let Symbian have unification.” Touche.

More jabs made earlier in the day after the jump…

Earlier in the day, both Nokia’s McDowell and Google’s Miner, were given the stage for back-to-back keynotes, and made vague references toward one another.

McDowell’s speech: In her keynote, McDowell talked about new ways mobile phones can be applied. For instance, they should be able to take a picture of a landmark, and then a user can find out facts about it, including its visiting hours. She also said that phones can have sensors to track things like flu epidemics. “Rather than going online to track flu instances, what if you used sensors to take temperatures? That would provide very accurate information at a very high level of granularity. Other sensors can be deployed for weather monitoring or seismic data.” She didn’t name Google, but it can be assumed she was referencing Google’s recently announced service that pairs PC searches for “Flu” and geographic information to find out where outbreaks are.

Miner’s speech: Miner stepped up on stage just after McDowell, who had gone through Nokia’s entire history about how it started off as a rubber company which made tires and galoshes. In what seemed like a genuinely light-hearted comment, Miner said: “I can say for sure that Google has never been in the galoshes business, and really, we’ve only been shipping phones for a couple of weeks, too.”

  1. Its interesting that they had nothing to say about Apple? Who I suspect also wasn't there?

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post