<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Microsoft Should Bid Again &#8212; and Yahoo Should Accept</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 07:17:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Need some quick helps - Page 5 - StrafeRight Forums</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-152632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Need some quick helps - Page 5 - StrafeRight Forums]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-152632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Why Microsoft Should Bid Again &#8212; and Yahoo Should Accept  is that good?   __________________ My City Links:  Population - Industry - Transport [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Microsoft Should Bid Again &#8212; and Yahoo Should Accept  is that good?   __________________ My City Links:  Population &#8211; Industry &#8211; Transport [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beyond the Box &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why now, Jerry?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-152631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beyond the Box &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why now, Jerry?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-152631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Jerry&#8217;s unwillingness to merge with Microsoft. (In the interest of fairness and education, here&#8217;s GigaOm&#8217;s take on why Microsoft should now pursue the merger again.) Yes, perhaps it would have maximized [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jerry&rsquo;s unwillingness to merge with Microsoft. (In the interest of fairness and education, here&#8217;s GigaOm&#8217;s take on why Microsoft should now pursue the merger again.) Yes, perhaps it would have maximized [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Something about Yahoo - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-152630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Something about Yahoo - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-152630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Why Microsoft should bid again - and Yahoo should accept.  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Microsoft should bid again &#8211; and Yahoo should accept.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: November 19, 2008 &#124; next media update</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-152629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[November 19, 2008 &#124; next media update]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-152629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Why Microsoft Should Bid Again - and Yahoo Should Accept  GIGAOM Now that Yahoo co-founder and CEO Jerry Yang has finally stepped aside, removing what many (including Ballmer himself) saw as one of the main barriers to bringing the two companies together, Microsoft should re-ignite acquisition talks with the company. But that&#8217;s not the only reason. There are plenty of other good ones why it should do so - and why Yahoo should accept. After his last effort to strike some kind of a deal with Yahoo ended in failure, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said categorically that the software behemoth had no interest in making another acquisition bid for the troubled web company. Was he just bluffing? That should become obvious relatively soon, now that co-founder and CEO Jerry Yang has finally stepped aside, removing what many (including Ballmer himself) saw as one of the main barriers to bringing the two companies together. But that&#8217;s not the only reason Microsoft should re-ignite acquisition talks with the company. There are plenty of other good ones why it should do so - and why Yahoo should accept. Source&gt; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Microsoft Should Bid Again &#8211; and Yahoo Should Accept  GIGAOM Now that Yahoo co-founder and CEO Jerry Yang has finally stepped aside, removing what many (including Ballmer himself) saw as one of the main barriers to bringing the two companies together, Microsoft should re-ignite acquisition talks with the company. But that&#8217;s not the only reason. There are plenty of other good ones why it should do so &#8211; and why Yahoo should accept. After his last effort to strike some kind of a deal with Yahoo ended in failure, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said categorically that the software behemoth had no interest in making another acquisition bid for the troubled web company. Was he just bluffing? That should become obvious relatively soon, now that co-founder and CEO Jerry Yang has finally stepped aside, removing what many (including Ballmer himself) saw as one of the main barriers to bringing the two companies together. But that&#8217;s not the only reason Microsoft should re-ignite acquisition talks with the company. There are plenty of other good ones why it should do so &#8211; and why Yahoo should accept. Source&gt; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjun</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-152628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arjun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-152628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Couldn&#039;t agree with you more Gordon, given Microsoft&#039;s failed attempts at establishing an Internet presence, I will be highly skeptical that MS has the vision to make Y! any better quickly. The whole thing lingers on search, make Y! search better and the entire company starts looking healtier to investors. Jerry has invested in technology and platform and it will take some time to see the results.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree with you more Gordon, given Microsoft&#8217;s failed attempts at establishing an Internet presence, I will be highly skeptical that MS has the vision to make Y! any better quickly. The whole thing lingers on search, make Y! search better and the entire company starts looking healtier to investors. Jerry has invested in technology and platform and it will take some time to see the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft: “Non vogliamo comprare Yahoo” - The Inquirer IT</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-152627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Microsoft: “Non vogliamo comprare Yahoo” - The Inquirer IT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-152627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a volte imperscrutabili, stavolta hanno parlato chiaro: Microsoft “deve” comprare Yahoo. Le analisi che valutano i benefici sia per Microsoft che per Yahoo si sprecano. “(Farsi comprare da [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a volte imperscrutabili, stavolta hanno parlato chiaro: Microsoft “deve” comprare Yahoo. Le analisi che valutano i benefici sia per Microsoft che per Yahoo si sprecano. “(Farsi comprare da [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-152626</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-152626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is easy to see that the things you mention Microsoft getting from the deal, a cheaper price for something they would have paid for earlier, and the search solution it has consistently failed to build.  And of course the Yahoo shareholders get cash out of a transaction. But what does Yahoo get from the deal other than that?  What magic does Microsoft have that will make Yahoo&#039;s assets more productive for Microsoft than they would be on their own?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is easy to see that the things you mention Microsoft getting from the deal, a cheaper price for something they would have paid for earlier, and the search solution it has consistently failed to build.  And of course the Yahoo shareholders get cash out of a transaction. But what does Yahoo get from the deal other than that?  What magic does Microsoft have that will make Yahoo&#8217;s assets more productive for Microsoft than they would be on their own?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Bradley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-152625</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Bradley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-152625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aol and Yahoo together, fell on the floor laughing, 2 companies that have given me fits over the years, many years ago in internet years though.  I have given up on using yahoo ppc, just a waste of time IMHO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aol and Yahoo together, fell on the floor laughing, 2 companies that have given me fits over the years, many years ago in internet years though.  I have given up on using yahoo ppc, just a waste of time IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-152624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-152624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Marshall.

And @OK, I think you are probably right.  Microsoft has the luxury of waiting now -- and every time Steve says they aren&#039;t interested, the share price goes down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Marshall.</p>
<p>And @OK, I think you are probably right.  Microsoft has the luxury of waiting now &#8212; and every time Steve says they aren&#8217;t interested, the share price goes down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adwait Ullal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-152623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adwait Ullal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-152623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But do they really need to, now? Especially since the primary Yahoo Search engineer has resigned and joined Microsoft.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But do they really need to, now? Especially since the primary Yahoo Search engineer has resigned and joined Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
