<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Microsoft Should Bid Again &#8212; and Yahoo Should Accept</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Need some quick helps - Page 5 - StrafeRight Forums</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-956825</link>
		<dc:creator>Need some quick helps - Page 5 - StrafeRight Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-956825</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Why Microsoft Should Bid Again &#8212; and Yahoo Should Accept  is that good?   __________________ My City Links:  Population - Industry - Transport [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Microsoft Should Bid Again &#8212; and Yahoo Should Accept  is that good?   __________________ My City Links:  Population &#8211; Industry &#8211; Transport [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beyond the Box &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why now, Jerry?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-928486</link>
		<dc:creator>Beyond the Box &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why now, Jerry?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-928486</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Jerry&#8217;s unwillingness to merge with Microsoft. (In the interest of fairness and education, here&#8217;s GigaOm&#8217;s take on why Microsoft should now pursue the merger again.) Yes, perhaps it would have maximized [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jerry&rsquo;s unwillingness to merge with Microsoft. (In the interest of fairness and education, here&#8217;s GigaOm&#8217;s take on why Microsoft should now pursue the merger again.) Yes, perhaps it would have maximized [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Something about Yahoo - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-917454</link>
		<dc:creator>Something about Yahoo - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-917454</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Why Microsoft should bid again - and Yahoo should accept.  [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Microsoft should bid again &#8211; and Yahoo should accept.  [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: November 19, 2008 &#124; next media update</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-913858</link>
		<dc:creator>November 19, 2008 &#124; next media update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-913858</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Why Microsoft Should Bid Again - and Yahoo Should Accept  GIGAOM Now that Yahoo co-founder and CEO Jerry Yang has finally stepped aside, removing what many (including Ballmer himself) saw as one of the main barriers to bringing the two companies together, Microsoft should re-ignite acquisition talks with the company. But that&#8217;s not the only reason. There are plenty of other good ones why it should do so - and why Yahoo should accept. After his last effort to strike some kind of a deal with Yahoo ended in failure, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said categorically that the software behemoth had no interest in making another acquisition bid for the troubled web company. Was he just bluffing? That should become obvious relatively soon, now that co-founder and CEO Jerry Yang has finally stepped aside, removing what many (including Ballmer himself) saw as one of the main barriers to bringing the two companies together. But that&#8217;s not the only reason Microsoft should re-ignite acquisition talks with the company. There are plenty of other good ones why it should do so - and why Yahoo should accept. Source&gt; [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Microsoft Should Bid Again &#8211; and Yahoo Should Accept  GIGAOM Now that Yahoo co-founder and CEO Jerry Yang has finally stepped aside, removing what many (including Ballmer himself) saw as one of the main barriers to bringing the two companies together, Microsoft should re-ignite acquisition talks with the company. But that&#8217;s not the only reason. There are plenty of other good ones why it should do so &#8211; and why Yahoo should accept. After his last effort to strike some kind of a deal with Yahoo ended in failure, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said categorically that the software behemoth had no interest in making another acquisition bid for the troubled web company. Was he just bluffing? That should become obvious relatively soon, now that co-founder and CEO Jerry Yang has finally stepped aside, removing what many (including Ballmer himself) saw as one of the main barriers to bringing the two companies together. But that&#8217;s not the only reason Microsoft should re-ignite acquisition talks with the company. There are plenty of other good ones why it should do so &#8211; and why Yahoo should accept. Source&gt; [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjun</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-913767</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-913767</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Couldn&#039;t agree with you more Gordon, given Microsoft&#039;s failed attempts at establishing an Internet presence, I will be highly skeptical that MS has the vision to make Y! any better quickly. The whole thing lingers on search, make Y! search better and the entire company starts looking healtier to investors. Jerry has invested in technology and platform and it will take some time to see the results.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree with you more Gordon, given Microsoft&#8217;s failed attempts at establishing an Internet presence, I will be highly skeptical that MS has the vision to make Y! any better quickly. The whole thing lingers on search, make Y! search better and the entire company starts looking healtier to investors. Jerry has invested in technology and platform and it will take some time to see the results.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft: “Non vogliamo comprare Yahoo” - The Inquirer IT</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-913763</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft: “Non vogliamo comprare Yahoo” - The Inquirer IT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-913763</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] a volte imperscrutabili, stavolta hanno parlato chiaro: Microsoft “deve” comprare Yahoo. Le analisi che valutano i benefici sia per Microsoft che per Yahoo si sprecano. “(Farsi comprare da [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a volte imperscrutabili, stavolta hanno parlato chiaro: Microsoft “deve” comprare Yahoo. Le analisi che valutano i benefici sia per Microsoft che per Yahoo si sprecano. “(Farsi comprare da [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-913759</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-913759</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It is easy to see that the things you mention Microsoft getting from the deal, a cheaper price for something they would have paid for earlier, and the search solution it has consistently failed to build.  And of course the Yahoo shareholders get cash out of a transaction. But what does Yahoo get from the deal other than that?  What magic does Microsoft have that will make Yahoo&#039;s assets more productive for Microsoft than they would be on their own?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is easy to see that the things you mention Microsoft getting from the deal, a cheaper price for something they would have paid for earlier, and the search solution it has consistently failed to build.  And of course the Yahoo shareholders get cash out of a transaction. But what does Yahoo get from the deal other than that?  What magic does Microsoft have that will make Yahoo&#8217;s assets more productive for Microsoft than they would be on their own?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Bradley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-913732</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-913732</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Aol and Yahoo together, fell on the floor laughing, 2 companies that have given me fits over the years, many years ago in internet years though.  I have given up on using yahoo ppc, just a waste of time IMHO.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aol and Yahoo together, fell on the floor laughing, 2 companies that have given me fits over the years, many years ago in internet years though.  I have given up on using yahoo ppc, just a waste of time IMHO.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-913729</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-913729</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Marshall.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And @OK, I think you are probably right.  Microsoft has the luxury of waiting now -- and every time Steve says they aren&#039;t interested, the share price goes down.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Marshall.</p>

<p>And @OK, I think you are probably right.  Microsoft has the luxury of waiting now &#8212; and every time Steve says they aren&#8217;t interested, the share price goes down.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adwait Ullal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-913720</link>
		<dc:creator>Adwait Ullal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-913720</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;But do they really need to, now? Especially since the primary Yahoo Search engineer has resigned and joined Microsoft.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But do they really need to, now? Especially since the primary Yahoo Search engineer has resigned and joined Microsoft.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Acquiring Yahoo&#8217;s Talent? &#124; The Noisy Channel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-913715</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Acquiring Yahoo&#8217;s Talent? &#124; The Noisy Channel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-913715</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the story of whether Microsoft should acquire Yahoo just can&#8217;t stay out of the news. But what&#8217;s more interesting is that Microsoft seems to be poaching key [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the story of whether Microsoft should acquire Yahoo just can&#8217;t stay out of the news. But what&#8217;s more interesting is that Microsoft seems to be poaching key [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fixing Yahoo What&#8217;s The Big Debate - It&#8217;s So Easy - Yahoo Turnaround Plan &#171; Furrier.org - Business &#38; Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-913712</link>
		<dc:creator>Fixing Yahoo What&#8217;s The Big Debate - It&#8217;s So Easy - Yahoo Turnaround Plan &#171; Furrier.org - Business &#38; Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-913712</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] November 19, 2008 Posted by John Furrier in Technology.  Tags: yahoo, Yahoo Turnaround trackback  The what to do with Yahoo debate is raging, but this isn&#8217;t rocket science. Fixing Yahoo is so easy and [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] November 19, 2008 Posted by John Furrier in Technology.  Tags: yahoo, Yahoo Turnaround trackback  The what to do with Yahoo debate is raging, but this isn&#8217;t rocket science. Fixing Yahoo is so easy and [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OK</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-913711</link>
		<dc:creator>OK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-913711</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There will be no other Microsoft bid for Yahoo. Next time Ballmer publicly admits to buy Yahoo, everything will be already negotiated (and settled) with major selling shareholders. The times for stock games are definitely over.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Write this down.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There will be no other Microsoft bid for Yahoo. Next time Ballmer publicly admits to buy Yahoo, everything will be already negotiated (and settled) with major selling shareholders. The times for stock games are definitely over.</p>

<p>Write this down.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shankar</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-913708</link>
		<dc:creator>Shankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-913708</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;They&#039;re not interested (http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE4AI5PD20081119).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It only melts the YHOO stock down and ironically YHOO is following the same path as Sun. Once a darling, now there isn&#039;t much to talk about ( Sun : Java, Servers, Yahoo : User community, Search Tech, which is better than MSFT, but not GOOG ). So its for dogs to salvage the flesh and blood, from bones. Its (more) bleeding time.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re not interested (<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE4AI5PD20081119" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE4AI5PD20081119</a>).</p>

<p>It only melts the YHOO stock down and ironically YHOO is following the same path as Sun. Once a darling, now there isn&#8217;t much to talk about ( Sun : Java, Servers, Yahoo : User community, Search Tech, which is better than MSFT, but not GOOG ). So its for dogs to salvage the flesh and blood, from bones. Its (more) bleeding time.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-913700</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-913700</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mathew Ingram guest post, damn, why didn&#039;t I think of that?  Good to read your thoughts over here, Mathew.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mathew Ingram guest post, damn, why didn&#8217;t I think of that?  Good to read your thoughts over here, Mathew.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjun Saksena</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/19/why-microsoft-should-bid-again-and-yahoo-should-accept/#comment-913688</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjun Saksena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=29602#comment-913688</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jerry has done well to not sell Search over to MS. To your point, yahoo search finds me everything i need to find, all that the new CEO needs to do is to focus on gaining ground on Google search and all the negative press will disappear, stock price will rise and give yahoo the breathing room to re-tool.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry has done well to not sell Search over to MS. To your point, yahoo search finds me everything i need to find, all that the new CEO needs to do is to focus on gaining ground on Google search and all the negative press will disappear, stock price will rise and give yahoo the breathing room to re-tool.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
