11 Comments

Summary:

Wired editor Chris Anderson’s theories about the Long Tail have been the source of considerable controversy almost since the day his first Wired magazine piece on the topic was published in 2004. The initial criticisms of his thesis centered on whether there was such a thing […]

200px-long_tailsvg Wired editor Chris Anderson’s theories about the Long Tail have been the source of considerable controversy almost since the day his first Wired magazine piece on the topic was published in 2004. The initial criticisms of his thesis centered on whether there was such a thing as a “long tail” at all — in other words, whether digital distribution of music and other forms of content have allowed little-known songs, movies, and so on to prosper where they might otherwise have been ignored. Later attacks, however, have focused on how the Long Tail theory functions in certain markets, and whether or not the existence of such an effect actually helps anyone in those markets create a workable business model.

The most recent criticisms came a few days ago, at a mobile telecom conference in London, where an economist named Will Page — who works for the MCPS-PRS Alliance, a British copyright licensing-fee collection agency — spoke about research he conducted into music-buying behavior. The results of this research, Page said, didn’t conform to the “power law” distribution described by Anderson’s theory, but instead followed a more common “log normal” distribution (if you really need to find out more about a topic only a statistician could love, you can check here and here).

The bottom line is that Page reportedly argued the data didn’t support the existence of a Long Tail for music buying (a claim that The Register pumped up into a post about how the entire concept is flawed, and how this is “bad news for Californian technology utopians”). Anderson, for his part, says the data appears to have come from research into mobile music-buying patterns — since mobile music provider Mblox was a partner in the study — and that he has already admitted mobile behavior is subject to different effects (music-industry theorist Gerd Leonhard makes some excellent points about other reasons why we shouldn’t necessarily believe the numbers, as does Yankee Group analyst Benoit Felten).

Why does this debate matter? Because Anderson’s theory suggests that content providers should expand their catalogs of music and movies to include more obscure titles, as a way of appealing to consumers with broader, Long-Tail type interests. By extension, the theory also suggests that musicians, writers and directors who are outside the mainstream might be able to pursue their creative dreams and still make a living. If there’s no Long Tail, then all bets could be off, and the Top 40 mentality could once again rule over content-related industries.

There have been previous attempts to bury the Long Tail, including one launched by a former research partner of Anderson’s, Anita Elberse, who wrote a piece for the Harvard Business Review about flaws in the theory based on data she collected. In that case, the former Wired editor made a fairly convincing argument that, far from torpedoing his conclusions, much of the data actually helped enhance the theory. Page’s study may not do that, but it is a long way from a smoking gun.

Contrary to what some might think, Chris Anderson didn’t invent the idea of the “long tail” — similar theories about the effect of diminishing production and distribution costs on digital media were
being discussed at least a decade before he wrote his Wired article, and many of the central concepts have been around since the mid-1940s. Whatever its flaws, it is still a powerful way of expressing the
changes the web has wrought in content-related markets of all kinds. Whether content producers, distributors and creators want to adapt or not is a different question.

  1. Doesn’t Long Tail theory apply to Obama’s fund raising strategy!

    Share
  2. [...] readers looking closely at this blog post at GigaOm about Chris Anderson’s Long Tail theory might notice that it has my name on it. [...]

    Share
  3. Great to see you posting here on the OM Network. The long tail will never die and it will remain relevant for some time. The problem is that monetizing it is impossible to do today. Also the notion of rolling up the long tail can only be done under one condition … I’ll be holding this secret for a a few more months.. but there is a way to roll up the long tail and make money..

    The answer is buried in my site http://furrier.org

    Share
  4. [...] Long Tail : Theory or Ideology 12Nov08 Given the ongoing and at time spicy debate that surrounds the Long Tail, as presented by WIRED’s Chris [...]

    Share
  5. It is really hard to believe that people keep on trying to fight the obvious! Why can’t they learn to live with this new reality? It is all about power. And the internet is the tool to democratize it. I hope that one day we will live the Long Tail of politics and make the world a better place. Peace!

    Share
  6. Facts beat faith every time: the Long Tail as a religion is in a lot of trouble.

    The interesting part of the Page study is omitted from this blog post: digital distribution resembles a lognormal distribution, not a Pareto (or “Power Law”) curve.

    But people don’t want to hear something that contradicts their religion.

    “It is all about power. And the internet is the tool to democratize it. ” – Leo Clark.

    No, politics is your tool for changing power. Not a blog or wiki.

    Share
  7. Yes, it is true, Steve. I am a believer!
    I would not go as far as to call it a religion, but ok.
    Having witnessed the “Long Tail” effect during a great part of my life, I prefer to rely on real world experiences rather than theory and graphics.

    A long time before I read and loved the book, I realized that what was happening was a “flattening” of the power pyramid. Meaning the few powerful people on top were being crushed together with the weak majority at the bottom.
    If you cut this pyramid in the middle, it is pretty similar to the Long Tail.

    But, for me, the important thing is that everywhere the powerful relied on control of content production and distribution, we now see a complete different picture.

    As a musician, I had 2 records released on major labels (Universal and Sony/BMG) and I do not need to tell anyone how the music industry is today.

    As an editor/producer/director for TV and film industry, I have seen companies that used to profit from renting equipment (1998 – average cost for a professional editing bay – us$ 150.000,00), that are now competing with teenagers who own equivalent gear (2004 – average cost of us$ 5000,00 or less) to produce content.
    It all happened in 6 years. Now, for us$ 1000,00 you are all set!
    These are a just a few examples. I am sure that almost everyone has seen something similar.

    And, although I do not believe in religion, I think that politics are the best example of how rotten the human spirit can be.
    I really hope that some day we will live in a world with very few (or none!) politicians. The last Long Tail barrier ;)

    I thank GigaOm’s blog and Steve’s comments for my inspiration.

    Leo, from Rio.


    LeoClark

    Share
  8. Chris Anderson Sunday, November 16, 2008

    Chris Anderson here. Matthew, many thanks for the clear and thorough summary of the various debates. I just wanted to correct one thing: I’m very much still the editor of Wired (not “former”)!

    Share
  9. [...] Long Tail : Theory or Ideology In internet, media on November 12, 2008 at 11:12 am Given the ongoing and at time spicy debate that surrounds the Long Tail, as presented by WIRED’s Chris [...]

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post