<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon Helps Encoding.com Slash Video Costs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/11/11/amazon-helps-encodingcom-slash-video-costs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/11/amazon-helps-encodingcom-slash-video-costs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 02:58:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Amazon Planning a Cloud Encoding Service?: Video &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/11/amazon-helps-encodingcom-slash-video-costs/#comment-464556</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Amazon Planning a Cloud Encoding Service?: Video &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 21:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=11679#comment-464556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] customers, who use EC2 to power their own encoding offerings. That includes HD Cloud, Zencoder and Encoding.com &#8212; the last of which was a finalist in Amazon’s 2008 Start-Up [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] customers, who use EC2 to power their own encoding offerings. That includes HD Cloud, Zencoder and Encoding.com &#8212; the last of which was a finalist in Amazon’s 2008 Start-Up [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Y Combinator Video Startups: Zencoder, Embedster, NowMov, Embedly</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/11/amazon-helps-encodingcom-slash-video-costs/#comment-464555</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Y Combinator Video Startups: Zencoder, Embedster, NowMov, Embedly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=11679#comment-464555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] as Amazon Web Services for video, with cloud-based on-demand transcoding. Like competitors such as Encoding.com, Zencoder actually uses AWS to power its service. Customers include Posterous and On2, which before [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as Amazon Web Services for video, with cloud-based on-demand transcoding. Like competitors such as Encoding.com, Zencoder actually uses AWS to power its service. Customers include Posterous and On2, which before [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloud-based Video Gets a Guarantee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/11/amazon-helps-encodingcom-slash-video-costs/#comment-464554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cloud-based Video Gets a Guarantee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=11679#comment-464554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Video Gets a&#160;Guarantee  This week Encoding.com, the provider of pay-as-you-go video encoding powered by Amazon Web Services, started offering service level agreements that guarantee it will process its customers&#8217; [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Video Gets a&nbsp;Guarantee  This week Encoding.com, the provider of pay-as-you-go video encoding powered by Amazon Web Services, started offering service level agreements that guarantee it will process its customers&#8217; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elemental Shakes Up Video Servers With Parallel Processing</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/11/amazon-helps-encodingcom-slash-video-costs/#comment-464553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elemental Shakes Up Video Servers With Parallel Processing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 04:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=11679#comment-464553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] from cloud computing alternatives &#8212; we&#8217;ve written about ones such as HD Cloud and Encoding.com &#8212; because content providers require a sturdier solution. However he made it clear Elemental [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from cloud computing alternatives &#8212; we&#8217;ve written about ones such as HD Cloud and Encoding.com &#8212; because content providers require a sturdier solution. However he made it clear Elemental [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Comments Poster</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/11/amazon-helps-encodingcom-slash-video-costs/#comment-464552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube Comments Poster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=11679#comment-464552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Did you know you can post comments automatically on websites like YouTube, XTube, Revver and more? You don&#039;t? I&#039;ll teach you how! Post comments automatically on video sharing websites, promote your websites, products and services automatically! YouTube Comments Poster - the best way to promote products and services for people who are interested in your niche!&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know you can post comments automatically on websites like YouTube, XTube, Revver and more? You don&#8217;t? I&#8217;ll teach you how! Post comments automatically on video sharing websites, promote your websites, products and services automatically! YouTube Comments Poster &#8211; the best way to promote products and services for people who are interested in your niche!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RipCode Transcodes Video into Cash: $12.5M &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/11/amazon-helps-encodingcom-slash-video-costs/#comment-464551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RipCode Transcodes Video into Cash: $12.5M &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=11679#comment-464551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] The company recently scored a deal to power MySpace&#8217;s mobile video. It faces new competition from the likes of Encoding.com, which offers on-demand pay-as-you-go encoding. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The company recently scored a deal to power MySpace&#8217;s mobile video. It faces new competition from the likes of Encoding.com, which offers on-demand pay-as-you-go encoding. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HHW</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/11/amazon-helps-encodingcom-slash-video-costs/#comment-464550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HHW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=11679#comment-464550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The problem is still that these solutions require transcoding on a server after the user uploads something. What needs to happen is that the transcode happens locally on the end-user&#039;s computer before its uploaded. This will scale perfectly since its harnessing the power of the submitting PC, the quality is better since the user doesnt have to make a compressed file first only to be uploaded to be further compressed, and there is no internal server side costs. Check out: www.framecaster.com/howitworks.html&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This solution is the best for completely removing server side costs. And whats best, the video goes straight from the end-user to the destination with no stop gaps.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is still that these solutions require transcoding on a server after the user uploads something. What needs to happen is that the transcode happens locally on the end-user&#8217;s computer before its uploaded. This will scale perfectly since its harnessing the power of the submitting PC, the quality is better since the user doesnt have to make a compressed file first only to be uploaded to be further compressed, and there is no internal server side costs. Check out: <a href="http://www.framecaster.com/howitworks.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.framecaster.com/howitworks.html</a></p>
<p>This solution is the best for completely removing server side costs. And whats best, the video goes straight from the end-user to the destination with no stop gaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Gannes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/11/amazon-helps-encodingcom-slash-video-costs/#comment-464549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liz Gannes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=11679#comment-464549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Good thoughts Akash -- I agree. The mid-tier providers are proliferating though. I think the key is to tie up with white-label video platforms. That type of customer wants a one-stop shop.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thoughts Akash &#8212; I agree. The mid-tier providers are proliferating though. I think the key is to tie up with white-label video platforms. That type of customer wants a one-stop shop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akash</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/11/amazon-helps-encodingcom-slash-video-costs/#comment-464548</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=11679#comment-464548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Interesting but their competitive advantage can easily be mimicked by entrenched players. What is the barrier to entry? 
And what customer segment are they targeting?  The premium content providers will not use them, low end will be satisfied with Youtube, etc. So they are left with mid tier market (semi pro). 
I see them being part of a larger video platform play - tie up with services provided by Brightcoves of the world. Thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting but their competitive advantage can easily be mimicked by entrenched players. What is the barrier to entry?<br />
And what customer segment are they targeting?  The premium content providers will not use them, low end will be satisfied with Youtube, etc. So they are left with mid tier market (semi pro).<br />
I see them being part of a larger video platform play &#8211; tie up with services provided by Brightcoves of the world. Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
