<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sun Microsystems to Lay Off 350</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/11/10/sun-microsystems-to-lay-off-350/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/10/sun-microsystems-to-lay-off-350/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:44:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Layoff Roundup : JOBMATCHBOX</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/10/sun-microsystems-to-lay-off-350/#comment-912207</link>
		<dc:creator>Layoff Roundup : JOBMATCHBOX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 05:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=28656#comment-912207</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] &#8216;Sun Microsystems to Lay Off 350&#8242; (GigaOM) [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8216;Sun Microsystems to Lay Off 350&#8242; (GigaOM) [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5liter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/10/sun-microsystems-to-lay-off-350/#comment-912199</link>
		<dc:creator>5liter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=28656#comment-912199</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I can tell you for sure that there is/was a massive layoff happening and a lot more than 350 people. A wave of layoffs occurred last wednesday across the company. Numbers reported are well under what has already been cut. Not to mention there was a reduction in force last quarter as well. I can&#039;t say that the people being cut were well thought out cuts either.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can tell you for sure that there is/was a massive layoff happening and a lot more than 350 people. A wave of layoffs occurred last wednesday across the company. Numbers reported are well under what has already been cut. Not to mention there was a reduction in force last quarter as well. I can&#8217;t say that the people being cut were well thought out cuts either.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: type247</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/10/sun-microsystems-to-lay-off-350/#comment-912149</link>
		<dc:creator>type247</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=28656#comment-912149</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the date error is just that, an error. This paper is a routine government filing, where this kind of boo-boo happens frequently.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As far as belt-tightening is concerned, there was a whopping one-time charge, and without that, the loss was $0.09 per share, or about $66M.  This is probably about the same as the cost savings they will get from a 350-person layoff.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, I agree that this is how bleed-outs happen. Sun has not effectively shrunk their workforce size at all over the last few years.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the date error is just that, an error. This paper is a routine government filing, where this kind of boo-boo happens frequently.</p>

<p>As far as belt-tightening is concerned, there was a whopping one-time charge, and without that, the loss was $0.09 per share, or about $66M.  This is probably about the same as the cost savings they will get from a 350-person layoff.</p>

<p>However, I agree that this is how bleed-outs happen. Sun has not effectively shrunk their workforce size at all over the last few years.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webster</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/10/sun-microsystems-to-lay-off-350/#comment-912106</link>
		<dc:creator>webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=28656#comment-912106</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is pure baloney. Just had a look at the pdf file and the dates look suspicious to me(mentions a RIF in 2009 and the dates are January 2008).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pure baloney. Just had a look at the pdf file and the dates look suspicious to me(mentions a RIF in 2009 and the dates are January 2008).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael F. Smith Jr. Lives Here &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Woe is Sun</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/10/sun-microsystems-to-lay-off-350/#comment-911979</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Smith Jr. Lives Here &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Woe is Sun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=28656#comment-911979</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] is announcing some layoffs today but like one of the commenters on the post - this is just a slow bleed out from a company who [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is announcing some layoffs today but like one of the commenters on the post &#8211; this is just a slow bleed out from a company who [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/10/sun-microsystems-to-lay-off-350/#comment-911972</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 04:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=28656#comment-911972</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A 1% force reduction is hardly a belt tightening.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is how slow but deadly bleed outs happen.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 1% force reduction is hardly a belt tightening.</p>

<p>This is how slow but deadly bleed outs happen.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nortel Cuts: Layoffs Come to Telco Land - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/10/sun-microsystems-to-lay-off-350/#comment-911863</link>
		<dc:creator>Nortel Cuts: Layoffs Come to Telco Land - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=28656#comment-911863</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] wireline chip maker cut 15 percent of its work force. ST-NXP Wireless has cut its workforce by 500. Elsewhere Freescale and Verio also made some cuts. All these companies are reacting to the broader market [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wireline chip maker cut 15 percent of its work force. ST-NXP Wireless has cut its workforce by 500. Elsewhere Freescale and Verio also made some cuts. All these companies are reacting to the broader market [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
