<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WiMAX Broadband Is Coming To the Boonies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/11/05/wimax-broadband-is-coming-to-the-boonies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/05/wimax-broadband-is-coming-to-the-boonies/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:45:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Another $100 Million for Rural WiMAX Operator</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/05/wimax-broadband-is-coming-to-the-boonies/#comment-921448</link>
		<dc:creator>Another $100 Million for Rural WiMAX Operator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=28073#comment-921448</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Malik  &#124; Monday, January 12, 2009 &#124; 7:42 AM PT &#124; 0 comments    As you know, we have been tracking the progress of Denver-based rural WiMAX operator Open Range Communications for quite some time [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malik  | Monday, January 12, 2009 | 7:42 AM PT | 0 comments    As you know, we have been tracking the progress of Denver-based rural WiMAX operator Open Range Communications for quite some time [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telecom observer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/05/wimax-broadband-is-coming-to-the-boonies/#comment-911008</link>
		<dc:creator>Telecom observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=28073#comment-911008</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I doubt very much any of the equipment vendors want anything to do with this. Look at the spectrum -- two separate bands of ATC spectrum, very funky. I believe they&#039;re using &quot;WiMAX&quot; as a buzzy term, rather than to denote actual gear certified by The WiMAX Forum.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just look at the speeds they&#039;re offering: 1.5/512. Not at all 4G, as they claim on their web site. Compare this to the Xohm launch in Baltimore with average speeds of 4/2.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Of course, they&#039;re not even &quot;offering&quot; those speeds -- they have no product. They&#039;ve been searching for sales partners and distributors for months now: &quot;Open Range will be evaluating candidates to become dealers in its communities. Currently we are requesting inquiries for Northern Colorado – specifically Ft. Collins, Greeley, Loveland and Longmont.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That message has been there since May.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt very much any of the equipment vendors want anything to do with this. Look at the spectrum &#8212; two separate bands of ATC spectrum, very funky. I believe they&#8217;re using &#8220;WiMAX&#8221; as a buzzy term, rather than to denote actual gear certified by The WiMAX Forum.</p>

<p>Just look at the speeds they&#8217;re offering: 1.5/512. Not at all 4G, as they claim on their web site. Compare this to the Xohm launch in Baltimore with average speeds of 4/2.</p>

<p>Of course, they&#8217;re not even &#8220;offering&#8221; those speeds &#8212; they have no product. They&#8217;ve been searching for sales partners and distributors for months now: &#8220;Open Range will be evaluating candidates to become dealers in its communities. Currently we are requesting inquiries for Northern Colorado – specifically Ft. Collins, Greeley, Loveland and Longmont.&#8221;</p>

<p>That message has been there since May.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/05/wimax-broadband-is-coming-to-the-boonies/#comment-910818</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=28073#comment-910818</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Telecom observer&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Clearly the network will be built out, and likely managed, by an equipment vendor. Slemons&#039; time at AT&amp;T Wireless was marked by massive outsourcing of network design and deployment functions. I think the real (business) story here is who wins the contract.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Telecom observer</p>

<p>Clearly the network will be built out, and likely managed, by an equipment vendor. Slemons&#8217; time at AT&amp;T Wireless was marked by massive outsourcing of network design and deployment functions. I think the real (business) story here is who wins the contract.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telecom observer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/05/wimax-broadband-is-coming-to-the-boonies/#comment-910777</link>
		<dc:creator>Telecom observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=28073#comment-910777</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bill Beans was president and COO of ICG Communications and responsible for day-to-day operations of the company. ICG&#039;s stock tanked in 2000 to less than $2 per share from above $39 per share just six months prior, after the company revealed severe customer service problems and cut its growth forecasts way down from previous guidance.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Beans was personally named as a defendant in a shareholder lawsuit alleging securities fraud. The plaintiffs argued that he encouraged inflated line counts, an important metric for Wall Street in determining the health of LECs. Beans and his co-defendant, former ICG Chairman and CEO J. Shelby Bryan, settled out of court for $18 million.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.blbglaw.com/cases/00031&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bean&#039;s new company, Open Range Communications, had just 15 employees as of May. Hardly sufficient to build out a WiMAX network of the scale they&#039;re aiming for.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.denverpost.com/telecom/ci_9289367&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Beans was president and COO of ICG Communications and responsible for day-to-day operations of the company. ICG&#8217;s stock tanked in 2000 to less than $2 per share from above $39 per share just six months prior, after the company revealed severe customer service problems and cut its growth forecasts way down from previous guidance.</p>

<p>Beans was personally named as a defendant in a shareholder lawsuit alleging securities fraud. The plaintiffs argued that he encouraged inflated line counts, an important metric for Wall Street in determining the health of LECs. Beans and his co-defendant, former ICG Chairman and CEO J. Shelby Bryan, settled out of court for $18 million.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.blbglaw.com/cases/00031" rel="nofollow">http://www.blbglaw.com/cases/00031</a></p>

<p>Bean&#8217;s new company, Open Range Communications, had just 15 employees as of May. Hardly sufficient to build out a WiMAX network of the scale they&#8217;re aiming for.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.denverpost.com/telecom/ci_9289367" rel="nofollow">http://www.denverpost.com/telecom/ci_9289367</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
