<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Killed the VoIP Revolution?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:12:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/#comment-151563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27266#comment-151563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now I&#039;m a SIP user and an ordinary member of the public.

The real problem with SIP to the public is public visibility and ease of use:
1. Who out of the public understands SIP, VOIP, Asterisk, POTS, QOS, PSTN etc.etc.??
2. People do not want to get on their pc&#039;s, choose the software. (Maybe hardware instead that often has an awfully full array of settings).
3. Find a SIP company and then pay them money up front. (Often, they are not so cheap nor reliable).
4. Work out how to put the settings to use into the pc or hardware.
5. Learn all about how to make free SIP to SIP calls. From geeky howtos written in gobbledy gook.

All they want to do is load Skype and use a login. Done.
Thats what the public want. Upfront its like an IM, they can handle that.
If they later wish to go the hardware route then they find that is simple too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I&#8217;m a SIP user and an ordinary member of the public.</p>
<p>The real problem with SIP to the public is public visibility and ease of use:<br />
1. Who out of the public understands SIP, VOIP, Asterisk, POTS, QOS, PSTN etc.etc.??<br />
2. People do not want to get on their pc&#8217;s, choose the software. (Maybe hardware instead that often has an awfully full array of settings).<br />
3. Find a SIP company and then pay them money up front. (Often, they are not so cheap nor reliable).<br />
4. Work out how to put the settings to use into the pc or hardware.<br />
5. Learn all about how to make free SIP to SIP calls. From geeky howtos written in gobbledy gook.</p>
<p>All they want to do is load Skype and use a login. Done.<br />
Thats what the public want. Upfront its like an IM, they can handle that.<br />
If they later wish to go the hardware route then they find that is simple too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Killed the VoIP Revolution? &#124; Telephones @ SoHo-World.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/#comment-151562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Who Killed the VoIP Revolution? &#124; Telephones @ SoHo-World.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 07:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27266#comment-151562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skype Now Means Business, Friends The SIP World</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/#comment-151561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skype Now Means Business, Friends The SIP World]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27266#comment-151561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Post: Who killed the VoIP Revolution?     [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Post: Who killed the VoIP Revolution?     [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amish</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/#comment-151560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27266#comment-151560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Offering stuff free on the internet may just well prove to be the original sin, as we are seeing with the impending doom of journalism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Offering stuff free on the internet may just well prove to be the original sin, as we are seeing with the impending doom of journalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comcast Is Now 3rd Largest U.S. Phone Company</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/#comment-151559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Comcast Is Now 3rd Largest U.S. Phone Company]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27266#comment-151559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] providers like Vonage, which has been struggling to keep its early momentum. (Related Posts: Who killed the VoIP revolution? and Is Cable VoIP getting a sore throat?)    [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] providers like Vonage, which has been struggling to keep its early momentum. (Related Posts: Who killed the VoIP revolution? and Is Cable VoIP getting a sore throat?)    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ming Family Blog &#187; Who Killed VoIP?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/#comment-151558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Ming Family Blog &#187; Who Killed VoIP?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27266#comment-151558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] products with no customers/consumers to buy them, and they go out of business. I recently read an interesting article called &#8220;Who killed the VoIP revolution?&#8221; and I am in 100% agreement with the author and the info [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] products with no customers/consumers to buy them, and they go out of business. I recently read an interesting article called &#8220;Who killed the VoIP revolution?&#8221; and I am in 100% agreement with the author and the info [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 can complement, but not supplement business &#124; ebunoluwa.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/#comment-151557</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web 2.0 can complement, but not supplement business &#124; ebunoluwa.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27266#comment-151557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] me: Business models sink or swim. Several new business models have emerged this decade, among them VoIP, social networks and online video. But with a few exceptions, they haven’t been profitable. 2009 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] me: Business models sink or swim. Several new business models have emerged this decade, among them VoIP, social networks and online video. But with a few exceptions, they haven’t been profitable. 2009 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bell</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/#comment-151556</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Bell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27266#comment-151556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daniel makes a great point here.

And for those of you who think that Skype never figured out how to make money from VoIP, Zennstrom can provide a couple billion examples of just exactly how wrong you are.

As a final epitaph for this piece, which has caused me no small amount of difficulty among my peers in the nextgen telecom space lately, I will say this:  Skype, and by extension voice chat, is fundamentally an internet application.  Most applications we use on the internet are free.  Do the math.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel makes a great point here.</p>
<p>And for those of you who think that Skype never figured out how to make money from VoIP, Zennstrom can provide a couple billion examples of just exactly how wrong you are.</p>
<p>As a final epitaph for this piece, which has caused me no small amount of difficulty among my peers in the nextgen telecom space lately, I will say this:  Skype, and by extension voice chat, is fundamentally an internet application.  Most applications we use on the internet are free.  Do the math.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoIP: Dead or Alive?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/#comment-151555</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VoIP: Dead or Alive?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 02:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27266#comment-151555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] said, boring. Where do we come out on this debate? On the side of realism. About two months ago, Ian Bell on our behalf analyzed the state of VoIP and why it was &#8220;dead.&#8221; We were egged on by some comments made by Skype General Manager of Voice and Video Jonathan [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] said, boring. Where do we come out on this debate? On the side of realism. About two months ago, Ian Bell on our behalf analyzed the state of VoIP and why it was &#8220;dead.&#8221; We were egged on by some comments made by Skype General Manager of Voice and Video Jonathan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No one killed the VoIP Revolution! &#171; Nirupesh Joshi&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/#comment-151554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[No one killed the VoIP Revolution! &#171; Nirupesh Joshi&#8217;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27266#comment-151554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Christensen, GM of Skype audio and video recently declared VoIP is dead. Ian Andrew Bell asks &#8216;Who killed the VoIP revolution&#8217; in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Christensen, GM of Skype audio and video recently declared VoIP is dead. Ian Andrew Bell asks &#8216;Who killed the VoIP revolution&#8217; in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Junction Networks Charges for On-Net VoIP Calls: Is VoIP 2.0 Behind the Corner? &#124; LucaFiligheddu.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/#comment-151553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Junction Networks Charges for On-Net VoIP Calls: Is VoIP 2.0 Behind the Corner? &#124; LucaFiligheddu.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27266#comment-151553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Who Killed the VoIP Revolution? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Who Killed the VoIP Revolution? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why There Is No More space for new VoIP Players &#124; LucaFiligheddu.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/#comment-151552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why There Is No More space for new VoIP Players &#124; LucaFiligheddu.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 22:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27266#comment-151552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Who Killed the VoIP Revolution? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Who Killed the VoIP Revolution? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Berninger</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/#comment-151551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Berninger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27266#comment-151551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ian does a nice job of summarizing why the revolution never existed, not that it died.  The failure to find an alternative to the telco usage based revenue model predetermined the outcome.  Moore&#039;s law continues to act on various ecosystem components, connectivity options continue to improve, and new devices continue to arrive, but revolution remains contingent on finding a sustainable revenue model.  The lack of an alternative to burning VC cash represents a problem for the broader Internet, not just VoIP.  Free World Dialup (SIP registration) expects to complete a transition to paid membership by the end of the year.  The unpopular move eliminated the cost of supporting users that do not value the service.  We can now watch and wait as the lack of investment dollars shrinks the number of free competitors.  The arrival of a SIP client for iPhone (see fring.com) doubled the pace of new users since early October.  No revolution as yet, but the possibility for one remains.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian does a nice job of summarizing why the revolution never existed, not that it died.  The failure to find an alternative to the telco usage based revenue model predetermined the outcome.  Moore&#8217;s law continues to act on various ecosystem components, connectivity options continue to improve, and new devices continue to arrive, but revolution remains contingent on finding a sustainable revenue model.  The lack of an alternative to burning VC cash represents a problem for the broader Internet, not just VoIP.  Free World Dialup (SIP registration) expects to complete a transition to paid membership by the end of the year.  The unpopular move eliminated the cost of supporting users that do not value the service.  We can now watch and wait as the lack of investment dollars shrinks the number of free competitors.  The arrival of a SIP client for iPhone (see fring.com) doubled the pace of new users since early October.  No revolution as yet, but the possibility for one remains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tradeskilz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/#comment-151550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tradeskilz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27266#comment-151550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The absolute best deal available is Magic Jack $30 bucks 1 time cost + $19 for each YEAR! Thats it! Screw all those high phone bills! www.magicjack.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The absolute best deal available is Magic Jack $30 bucks 1 time cost + $19 for each YEAR! Thats it! Screw all those high phone bills! <a href="http://www.magicjack.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.magicjack.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoIP News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wednesday Links: Fierce 15, VoIP Revolution</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/#comment-151549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VoIP News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wednesday Links: Fierce 15, VoIP Revolution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27266#comment-151549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is never good. Gigaom wonders who killed the VoIP [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is never good. Gigaom wonders who killed the VoIP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/11/02/who-killed-the-voip-revolution/#comment-151548</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27266#comment-151548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are very wrong about VoIP.  Take a look at Bank of America, Best Buy, CVS, Ford, Wachovia,and Thousands more.
They all moved their service from POTS to VoIP.  They saved millions in phone bills, and taxes.   I own a very profitable VoIP Company.  VOIP is dead, huh!  It&#039;s just the beginning.  Thanks for slowing down my competition. In 10 years, most of your telephone lines will run over a VoIP Pllatform.  It is already happening daily.  You could not be more wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are very wrong about VoIP.  Take a look at Bank of America, Best Buy, CVS, Ford, Wachovia,and Thousands more.<br />
They all moved their service from POTS to VoIP.  They saved millions in phone bills, and taxes.   I own a very profitable VoIP Company.  VOIP is dead, huh!  It&#8217;s just the beginning.  Thanks for slowing down my competition. In 10 years, most of your telephone lines will run over a VoIP Pllatform.  It is already happening daily.  You could not be more wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

