<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just Saying: Google Didn&#8217;t Start In a Downturn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/10/29/google-did-not-start-in-a-downturn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/29/google-did-not-start-in-a-downturn/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:38:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: As perdas de emprego: O Vale do Silício: Perspectivas &#171; ATer: Criação de Sites</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/29/google-did-not-start-in-a-downturn/#comment-925271</link>
		<dc:creator>As perdas de emprego: O Vale do Silício: Perspectivas &#171; ATer: Criação de Sites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27249#comment-925271</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Em outras palavras, se você está realmente incrível, você pode conseguir um emprego (com uma remuneração corte). Entretanto, durante a revista Fortune, os pessimistas estão especulando vez que esta tecnologia não irá salvar-nos desta desaceleração, alegando que as dot-com busto nem sequer foi assim tão mau porque é quando o Google foi formado. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Em outras palavras, se você está realmente incrível, você pode conseguir um emprego (com uma remuneração corte). Entretanto, durante a revista Fortune, os pessimistas estão especulando vez que esta tecnologia não irá salvar-nos desta desaceleração, alegando que as dot-com busto nem sequer foi assim tão mau porque é quando o Google foi formado. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Job Losses: The Silicon Valley Perspective</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/29/google-did-not-start-in-a-downturn/#comment-925170</link>
		<dc:creator>Job Losses: The Silicon Valley Perspective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27249#comment-925170</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] In other words, if you&#8217;re really awesome, you might get a job (with a pay cut). Meanwhile, over at Fortune, the pessimists are speculating that this time technology won&#8217;t save us from this downturn, alleging that the dot-com bust wasn&#8217;t even this bad because that&#8217;s when Google was formed. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In other words, if you&#8217;re really awesome, you might get a job (with a pay cut). Meanwhile, over at Fortune, the pessimists are speculating that this time technology won&#8217;t save us from this downturn, alleging that the dot-com bust wasn&#8217;t even this bad because that&#8217;s when Google was formed. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 21st Century Spirituality &#183; Hyperstream of 2008-10-30</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/29/google-did-not-start-in-a-downturn/#comment-912603</link>
		<dc:creator>21st Century Spirituality &#183; Hyperstream of 2008-10-30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27249#comment-912603</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] mushin published a blog post. Hutch Carpenter: Just Saying: Google Didn’t Start In a Downturn (via Google Reader) [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mushin published a blog post. Hutch Carpenter: Just Saying: Google Didn’t Start In a Downturn (via Google Reader) [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadowlayer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/29/google-did-not-start-in-a-downturn/#comment-910074</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadowlayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 06:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27249#comment-910074</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The &#039;myth&#039; is pretty much a feel-good statement from the industry, so people will keep trying.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And BTW, both Microsoft and Apple were founded in the mid-70s, just a couple years after the oil embargo and right during some of the worst days of that crisis.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;myth&#8217; is pretty much a feel-good statement from the industry, so people will keep trying.</p>

<p>And BTW, both Microsoft and Apple were founded in the mid-70s, just a couple years after the oil embargo and right during some of the worst days of that crisis.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google, la crisis y la creatividad &#187; El Blog de Enrique Dans</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/29/google-did-not-start-in-a-downturn/#comment-909829</link>
		<dc:creator>Google, la crisis y la creatividad &#187; El Blog de Enrique Dans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 12:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27249#comment-909829</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] antes de que se conviertan en leyendas urbanas, y Om Malik lo hace en esta entrada: &#8220;Just saying: Google didn’t start in a downturn&#8220;. Y es que efectivamente, muchas personas, queriendo apoyar la imagen de que las crisis [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] antes de que se conviertan en leyendas urbanas, y Om Malik lo hace en esta entrada: &#8220;Just saying: Google didn’t start in a downturn&#8220;. Y es que efectivamente, muchas personas, queriendo apoyar la imagen de que las crisis [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roundup: Another record for cleantech, economy contracting, music news and more &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/29/google-did-not-start-in-a-downturn/#comment-909297</link>
		<dc:creator>Roundup: Another record for cleantech, economy contracting, music news and more &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27249#comment-909297</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] like to point to Google as a company that started in the downturn and went on to stunning success. GigaOm shreds that &#8220;modern day [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] like to point to Google as a company that started in the downturn and went on to stunning success. GigaOm shreds that &#8220;modern day [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechPuree</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/29/google-did-not-start-in-a-downturn/#comment-909241</link>
		<dc:creator>TechPuree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27249#comment-909241</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The write-up is quite logical and real in the backdrop of facts presented by you. While the Oracle success story certainly seems to be of the &quot;genre&quot; that you want to highlight and the Google success story may not be actually that of a startup getting success in downturn.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The write-up is quite logical and real in the backdrop of facts presented by you. While the Oracle success story certainly seems to be of the &#8220;genre&#8221; that you want to highlight and the Google success story may not be actually that of a startup getting success in downturn.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fanboy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/29/google-did-not-start-in-a-downturn/#comment-909230</link>
		<dc:creator>fanboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27249#comment-909230</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;ipod (2001) / itunes (2001) / itunes store (2003)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ipod (2001) / itunes (2001) / itunes store (2003)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kelleher</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/29/google-did-not-start-in-a-downturn/#comment-909229</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kelleher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27249#comment-909229</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;erp, sorry. &lt;em&gt;Google&lt;/em&gt; not Googke. More coffee, please.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>erp, sorry. <em>Google</em> not Googke. More coffee, please.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kelleher</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/29/google-did-not-start-in-a-downturn/#comment-909228</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kelleher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27249#comment-909228</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Good point about Googke, but Oracle was founded in 1977, between recessions. While it&#039;s true the economy was far from terrific and the sock market was going sideways in 1977, that&#039;s not the same as saying it was founded in a downturn. A list of recessions can be found here:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_recessions&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I mention this because it came up in a recent thread here ( http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/how-wall-street-can-hurt-silicon-valley/#comment-902306 ). Some tech giants were founded in recessions and downturns, but just as many weren&#039;t.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More important, the ones that were had their starts at the &lt;I&gt;end&lt;/I&gt; of recessions or depressions. Many economists are expecting this downturn to last several years, so if you follow this logic - and I don&#039;t think you should - one should wait three or four years to found a start-up.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Kevin&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om,</p>

<p>Good point about Googke, but Oracle was founded in 1977, between recessions. While it&#8217;s true the economy was far from terrific and the sock market was going sideways in 1977, that&#8217;s not the same as saying it was founded in a downturn. A list of recessions can be found here:</p>

<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_recessions" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_recessions</a></p>

<p>I mention this because it came up in a recent thread here ( <a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/how-wall-street-can-hurt-silicon-valley/#comment-902306" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/how-wall-street-can-hurt-silicon-valley/#comment-902306</a> ). Some tech giants were founded in recessions and downturns, but just as many weren&#8217;t.</p>

<p>More important, the ones that were had their starts at the <i>end</i> of recessions or depressions. Many economists are expecting this downturn to last several years, so if you follow this logic &#8211; and I don&#8217;t think you should &#8211; one should wait three or four years to found a start-up.</p>

<p>Kevin</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Saying: Google Didn&#8217;t Start In a Downturn - GigaOM &#124; Marketing 2.1</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/29/google-did-not-start-in-a-downturn/#comment-909204</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Saying: Google Didn&#8217;t Start In a Downturn - GigaOM &#124; Marketing 2.1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27249#comment-909204</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Just Saying: Google Didn’t Start In a Downturn - GigaOM. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just Saying: Google Didn’t Start In a Downturn &#8211; GigaOM. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/29/google-did-not-start-in-a-downturn/#comment-909190</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27249#comment-909190</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Ron&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You can nitpick on the details but it is clear that the myth of google being this great thing that started in a downturn is just that -- a myth. the idea of adwords well, i don&#039;t have the precise date on when it became live, but the idea wasn&#039;t &quot;downturn&quot; inspired. It just happened to coincide with the bad times and it was the only ad-model people were willing to experiment with.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ron</p>

<p>You can nitpick on the details but it is clear that the myth of google being this great thing that started in a downturn is just that &#8212; a myth. the idea of adwords well, i don&#8217;t have the precise date on when it became live, but the idea wasn&#8217;t &#8220;downturn&#8221; inspired. It just happened to coincide with the bad times and it was the only ad-model people were willing to experiment with.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ninja</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/29/google-did-not-start-in-a-downturn/#comment-909186</link>
		<dc:creator>Ninja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27249#comment-909186</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Extreme innovations have not much to do with downturns. Most of the time it is need based. In silicon valley, most of the companies are just to expensive .. I have seen so many startup having 10-15 million dollar pumped in .. All they develop is widgets for facebook or some small game for i-phone. I don&#039;t think startup needs so much money to innovate whether in good time or bad time. I really endorse view of Paul Graham who stress on keeping operating cost as low as possible.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extreme innovations have not much to do with downturns. Most of the time it is need based. In silicon valley, most of the companies are just to expensive .. I have seen so many startup having 10-15 million dollar pumped in .. All they develop is widgets for facebook or some small game for i-phone. I don&#8217;t think startup needs so much money to innovate whether in good time or bad time. I really endorse view of Paul Graham who stress on keeping operating cost as low as possible.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Garret</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/29/google-did-not-start-in-a-downturn/#comment-909141</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Garret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=27249#comment-909141</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The dotcom crash started in March 2000, not 2001.  AdWords was started three months later, in June 2000, and launched three months after that.  So while you are right that Google didn&#039;t actually start in a downturn, it did achieve profitability during a downturn.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dotcom crash started in March 2000, not 2001.  AdWords was started three months later, in June 2000, and launched three months after that.  So while you are right that Google didn&#8217;t actually start in a downturn, it did achieve profitability during a downturn.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
