<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Amazon Ready For The Enterprise?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/10/27/is-amazon-ready-for-the-enterprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/27/is-amazon-ready-for-the-enterprise/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amazon EC2 Inches Closer To Corporate Customers</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/27/is-amazon-ready-for-the-enterprise/#comment-931044</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazon EC2 Inches Closer To Corporate Customers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=26615#comment-931044</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Is Amazon ready for the enterprise?     GA_googleFillSlot(&quot;gigaom_ros_post_footer&quot;); [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Amazon ready for the enterprise?     GA_googleFillSlot(&#8220;gigaom_ros_post_footer&#8221;); [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgannonwp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/27/is-amazon-ready-for-the-enterprise/#comment-909267</link>
		<dc:creator>jgannonwp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=26615#comment-909267</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Your point about peering relationships is a valid one.  I&#039;ll take it one step more and suggest that Amazon needs to open up about their entire configuration if they want enterprises to move the majority of workloads to their cloud.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If I&#039;m a CIO, I need to have a full understanding of the underpinnings of any hosting/cloud I&#039;m sitting on top of so that I&#039;m able to debug production problems.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is certainly a tradeoff for Amazon (revealing secret sauce vs. more enterprise revenue) but it&#039;s probably worth it for them in the long haul...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your point about peering relationships is a valid one.  I&#8217;ll take it one step more and suggest that Amazon needs to open up about their entire configuration if they want enterprises to move the majority of workloads to their cloud.</p>

<p>If I&#8217;m a CIO, I need to have a full understanding of the underpinnings of any hosting/cloud I&#8217;m sitting on top of so that I&#8217;m able to debug production problems.</p>

<p>There is certainly a tradeoff for Amazon (revealing secret sauce vs. more enterprise revenue) but it&#8217;s probably worth it for them in the long haul&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: i365 gets physical with on-site storage &#171; Storage Effect</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/27/is-amazon-ready-for-the-enterprise/#comment-908839</link>
		<dc:creator>i365 gets physical with on-site storage &#171; Storage Effect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=26615#comment-908839</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] poster child for this reluctance is Amazon S3, which guarantees 99.95% uptime, yet has a history that falls short of this [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] poster child for this reluctance is Amazon S3, which guarantees 99.95% uptime, yet has a history that falls short of this [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Steege</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/27/is-amazon-ready-for-the-enterprise/#comment-908531</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Steege</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=26615#comment-908531</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s hard to compensate people for the real-world costs of datacenter downtime.  The uptime guarantee is a good idea, but real adoption will start once they&#039;ve demonstrated it for a good long while.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to compensate people for the real-world costs of datacenter downtime.  The uptime guarantee is a good idea, but real adoption will start once they&#8217;ve demonstrated it for a good long while.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Microsoft Tempt Enterprises Up To the Cloud? - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/27/is-amazon-ready-for-the-enterprise/#comment-908513</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Microsoft Tempt Enterprises Up To the Cloud? - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=26615#comment-908513</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the company having stepped up its push into collaborative services and software &#8212; after all &#8220;the cloud&#8221; isn&#8217;t going away, most people said, and Microsoft is making the right move by using its global heft and broad [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the company having stepped up its push into collaborative services and software &#8212; after all &#8220;the cloud&#8221; isn&#8217;t going away, most people said, and Microsoft is making the right move by using its global heft and broad [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
