<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Technology Cure Health Care &#8212; Or Kill It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/will-technology-cure-health-care-or-kill-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/will-technology-cure-health-care-or-kill-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 11:50:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health IT</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/will-technology-cure-health-care-or-kill-it/#comment-150591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Health IT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25402#comment-150591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://healthit.medinanet.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Health IT &lt;/a&gt; will benefit healthcare. I don&#039;t believe that technology is the number one &#039;curer&#039; or &#039;killer&#039; of healthcare. What will cure or kill it is our own personal actions towards the subject.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://healthit.medinanet.com" rel="nofollow"> Health IT </a> will benefit healthcare. I don&#8217;t believe that technology is the number one &#8216;curer&#8217; or &#8216;killer&#8217; of healthcare. What will cure or kill it is our own personal actions towards the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter, Jack Dorsey annuncia un nuovo progetto &#124; ciaoblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/will-technology-cure-health-care-or-kill-it/#comment-150590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Twitter, Jack Dorsey annuncia un nuovo progetto &#124; ciaoblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25402#comment-150590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] sanitaria rappresenta, da un lato, il desiderio degli imprenditori di superare la regolamentazione del governo americano in materia, mentre, dall&#8217;altro, la frustrazione di tanti medici che [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sanitaria rappresenta, da un lato, il desiderio degli imprenditori di superare la regolamentazione del governo americano in materia, mentre, dall&#8217;altro, la frustrazione di tanti medici che [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Creator Gives Clues About His Next Venture</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/will-technology-cure-health-care-or-kill-it/#comment-150589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Twitter Creator Gives Clues About His Next Venture]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 23:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25402#comment-150589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Google. Yet tech companies excited about opportunities in health care will likely have to deal with government regulation and frustrated doctors who may have previously invested in technology for their practice but [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google. Yet tech companies excited about opportunities in health care will likely have to deal with government regulation and frustrated doctors who may have previously invested in technology for their practice but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will technology kill health care? &#124; Telecom News</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/will-technology-cure-health-care-or-kill-it/#comment-150588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will technology kill health care? &#124; Telecom News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 04:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25402#comment-150588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] advancing technology is bringing sophisticated diagnostic tests, like genetic screening, to the masses. Many are undergoing these studies, without the benefit of rigorous data to ensure [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] advancing technology is bringing sophisticated diagnostic tests, like genetic screening, to the masses. Many are undergoing these studies, without the benefit of rigorous data to ensure [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah C. Peel, MD</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/will-technology-cure-health-care-or-kill-it/#comment-150587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deborah C. Peel, MD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25402#comment-150587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Giving your genome to a for-profit corporation for testing today is a very dangerous act for the following reasons:

1) Americans NO longer have the right to health privacy! Today, your rights to health privacy in electronic health systems are nil. You have no control over personal electronic health information. Federal bureaucrats eliminated our rights to control the use and disclosures of personal health information in electronic systems in 2002. The media has not reported on this drastic elimination of every Americans&#039; privacy rights. See: http://www.patientprivacyrights.org/site/PageServer?pagename=HIPAA_Intent_Vs_Reality

2) Once you reveal your genome, you will never be able to delete it from the private corporation&#039;s data bases or make it private again. Why on earth would you pay someone to take and use the most personal health data that exists about you and your family for whatever purposes they choose? Think about Paris Hilton&#039;s sex video, once it was out in cyberspace, it can never be private again. It will live for millenia on the Internet.

3) Why pay a private corporation like 23andMe or any other for-profit genetic testing lab to take your extremely valuable and sensitive personal health data and give it to them as a CORPORATE asset---to sell, to disclose to researchers for studies you might not want to be part of, to sell as an asset to employers or insurers or financial institutions, or even to sell to the US Government as part of the data profiles they are building on every American in Fusion Centers.

4) The legal duties of coporations are to stockholders, not to patients or people who buy genetic tests. Genetic testing labs like 23andMe can be bought by Google or the Bank of America or to a business that sells employers genetic snapshots of future employees&#039; potential illnesses. Even if you trust a genetic lab----you have no control over whether that corporation is sold to another corporation that you would never want to own your DNA.

5) Today&#039;s health IT systems are notoriously insecure and hackable. An industry study of 850 electronic health records systems found ALL of them could easily be hacked. See: http://searchcio.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid182_gci1273006,00.html

What assurances do you have that the lab&#039;s database is secure enough to prevent your genome or genetic tests from being stolen?

6) It is crtical to understand that giving ownerhsip of a critical personal asset like your DNA or genome to a corporation is a very bad idea. Not only do you put your future opportunities at risk, you endanger your entire family&#039;s futures at the same time.

As a practicing physician who has spent over 30 years listening to patients whose sensitve medical records were used against them by employers or used to humiliate them or harm them in public, I am very well aware of how personal health information is used to harm people and ruin lives. I founded Patient Privacy Rights because health information should never be used except to help you get well or for research WITH your informed consent. No one should be denied a job or a promotion because of fears about their future health.

Because of the lack of privacy, 600,000 people refuse to seek treatment or early diagnosis for cancer and 2,000,000 refuse treatment for mental illness. 150,000 Iraqi vets refuse treatment for PTSD because they fear their treatment will not be private. The result is the highest rate of suicide among active duty military in 30 years. The lack of health privacy kills.

Current law is just not enough to protect health privacy. GINA is not enough. We need Congress to restore our longstanding Constitutional, legal, and ethical rights to control personal health information. Without that right firmly re-established in Federal law, giving ANYONE your sensitive genomic or health information is a very bad idea.

Check out our website. www.patientprivacyrights.org. You can sign up for e-alerts about health privacy in the Digital Age. If we are able to restore control over our personal digital health information, then we have a powerful model for building personal control over ALL our personal electronic data (financial, email, phone records, purchases, etc). If you do not fight for your privacy rights, who will?

If EVERYTHING about you is for sale and can be seen by everyone, will you continue to have your precious liberties and freedoms?

Deborah C. Peel, MD
Chair, Patient Privacy Rights
www.patientprivacyrights.org]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giving your genome to a for-profit corporation for testing today is a very dangerous act for the following reasons:</p>
<p>1) Americans NO longer have the right to health privacy! Today, your rights to health privacy in electronic health systems are nil. You have no control over personal electronic health information. Federal bureaucrats eliminated our rights to control the use and disclosures of personal health information in electronic systems in 2002. The media has not reported on this drastic elimination of every Americans&#8217; privacy rights. See: <a href="http://www.patientprivacyrights.org/site/PageServer?pagename=HIPAA_Intent_Vs_Reality" rel="nofollow">http://www.patientprivacyrights.org/site/PageServer?pagename=HIPAA_Intent_Vs_Reality</a></p>
<p>2) Once you reveal your genome, you will never be able to delete it from the private corporation&#8217;s data bases or make it private again. Why on earth would you pay someone to take and use the most personal health data that exists about you and your family for whatever purposes they choose? Think about Paris Hilton&#8217;s sex video, once it was out in cyberspace, it can never be private again. It will live for millenia on the Internet.</p>
<p>3) Why pay a private corporation like 23andMe or any other for-profit genetic testing lab to take your extremely valuable and sensitive personal health data and give it to them as a CORPORATE asset&#8212;to sell, to disclose to researchers for studies you might not want to be part of, to sell as an asset to employers or insurers or financial institutions, or even to sell to the US Government as part of the data profiles they are building on every American in Fusion Centers.</p>
<p>4) The legal duties of coporations are to stockholders, not to patients or people who buy genetic tests. Genetic testing labs like 23andMe can be bought by Google or the Bank of America or to a business that sells employers genetic snapshots of future employees&#8217; potential illnesses. Even if you trust a genetic lab&#8212;-you have no control over whether that corporation is sold to another corporation that you would never want to own your DNA.</p>
<p>5) Today&#8217;s health IT systems are notoriously insecure and hackable. An industry study of 850 electronic health records systems found ALL of them could easily be hacked. See: <a href="http://searchcio.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid182_gci1273006,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://searchcio.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid182_gci1273006,00.html</a></p>
<p>What assurances do you have that the lab&#8217;s database is secure enough to prevent your genome or genetic tests from being stolen?</p>
<p>6) It is crtical to understand that giving ownerhsip of a critical personal asset like your DNA or genome to a corporation is a very bad idea. Not only do you put your future opportunities at risk, you endanger your entire family&#8217;s futures at the same time.</p>
<p>As a practicing physician who has spent over 30 years listening to patients whose sensitve medical records were used against them by employers or used to humiliate them or harm them in public, I am very well aware of how personal health information is used to harm people and ruin lives. I founded Patient Privacy Rights because health information should never be used except to help you get well or for research WITH your informed consent. No one should be denied a job or a promotion because of fears about their future health.</p>
<p>Because of the lack of privacy, 600,000 people refuse to seek treatment or early diagnosis for cancer and 2,000,000 refuse treatment for mental illness. 150,000 Iraqi vets refuse treatment for PTSD because they fear their treatment will not be private. The result is the highest rate of suicide among active duty military in 30 years. The lack of health privacy kills.</p>
<p>Current law is just not enough to protect health privacy. GINA is not enough. We need Congress to restore our longstanding Constitutional, legal, and ethical rights to control personal health information. Without that right firmly re-established in Federal law, giving ANYONE your sensitive genomic or health information is a very bad idea.</p>
<p>Check out our website. <a href="http://www.patientprivacyrights.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.patientprivacyrights.org</a>. You can sign up for e-alerts about health privacy in the Digital Age. If we are able to restore control over our personal digital health information, then we have a powerful model for building personal control over ALL our personal electronic data (financial, email, phone records, purchases, etc). If you do not fight for your privacy rights, who will?</p>
<p>If EVERYTHING about you is for sale and can be seen by everyone, will you continue to have your precious liberties and freedoms?</p>
<p>Deborah C. Peel, MD<br />
Chair, Patient Privacy Rights<br />
<a href="http://www.patientprivacyrights.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.patientprivacyrights.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genetic Genealogy Tidbits &#187; The Genetic Genealogist</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/will-technology-cure-health-care-or-kill-it/#comment-150586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Genetic Genealogy Tidbits &#187; The Genetic Genealogist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25402#comment-150586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and completely confuse the reader (usually because the author is confused!).  However, in &#8220;Will Technology Cure Health Care — Or Kill It?,&#8221; journalist Alistair Croll does a good job: &#8220;Testing can get as low as $60, as [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and completely confuse the reader (usually because the author is confused!).  However, in &#8220;Will Technology Cure Health Care — Or Kill It?,&#8221; journalist Alistair Croll does a good job: &#8220;Testing can get as low as $60, as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/will-technology-cure-health-care-or-kill-it/#comment-150585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25402#comment-150585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[23andMe is cool. I hope they are into not being evil as much as Google is.

For ancestry why not stick to the National Genographic Society&#039;s Genographic project?
https://www3.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/

Or for genealogy go with Family Tree DNA who offers 20 years of FREE storage, state of the art equipment, and over 200,000 records to match against.
http://www.familytreedna.com
http://www.genomeweb.com/issues/news/150117-1.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>23andMe is cool. I hope they are into not being evil as much as Google is.</p>
<p>For ancestry why not stick to the National Genographic Society&#8217;s Genographic project?<br />
<a href="https://www3.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/" rel="nofollow">https://www3.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/</a></p>
<p>Or for genealogy go with Family Tree DNA who offers 20 years of FREE storage, state of the art equipment, and over 200,000 records to match against.<br />
<a href="http://www.familytreedna.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.familytreedna.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.genomeweb.com/issues/news/150117-1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.genomeweb.com/issues/news/150117-1.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COP</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/will-technology-cure-health-care-or-kill-it/#comment-150584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[COP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25402#comment-150584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dude,

You are mixing many things here. When Obama or people generally talk about Healthcare IT, its about making electronic medical records available to doc/patients. And connecting the existing systems. Hopefully towards reducing the cost and improving the care.  Google Health and Microsoft HealthVault are big strides in the direction.

The DNA diagnostics is simply like any other laboratory test. IF made available, docs ll prescribe it to make their decisions. Nothing changes as much in terms of healthcare costs. May be they increase a bit more. And help early detection to save lives.

Healthcare is complex. Technology will only solve a part of the problem. There has already been too much of mess. We&#039;ve to be very careful going forward.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude,</p>
<p>You are mixing many things here. When Obama or people generally talk about Healthcare IT, its about making electronic medical records available to doc/patients. And connecting the existing systems. Hopefully towards reducing the cost and improving the care.  Google Health and Microsoft HealthVault are big strides in the direction.</p>
<p>The DNA diagnostics is simply like any other laboratory test. IF made available, docs ll prescribe it to make their decisions. Nothing changes as much in terms of healthcare costs. May be they increase a bit more. And help early detection to save lives.</p>
<p>Healthcare is complex. Technology will only solve a part of the problem. There has already been too much of mess. We&#8217;ve to be very careful going forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronald</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/will-technology-cure-health-care-or-kill-it/#comment-150583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ronald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25402#comment-150583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh if it were just that simple.
Or, why don&#039;t identical twins get the same illnesses?
Health care cost are partial that high because people do self diagnoses. Based on some TV commercial or some web site woodoo.
Based on the twin studies we can say, DNA is maybe a 30-50% marker, in other words just flip a coin a few times.
So I agree with Stephanie. Life style changes if you are over weight for example and nutrition are way better to bring health care cost down then DNA sampling.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh if it were just that simple.<br />
Or, why don&#8217;t identical twins get the same illnesses?<br />
Health care cost are partial that high because people do self diagnoses. Based on some TV commercial or some web site woodoo.<br />
Based on the twin studies we can say, DNA is maybe a 30-50% marker, in other words just flip a coin a few times.<br />
So I agree with Stephanie. Life style changes if you are over weight for example and nutrition are way better to bring health care cost down then DNA sampling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/will-technology-cure-health-care-or-kill-it/#comment-150582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25402#comment-150582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An additional angle on this is the whole prevention side of the equation.  Just because you have a certain gene sequence doesn&#039;t mean you will actually get the disease.  Many of the body&#039;s systems controlled by genes are modifiable via nutrition and supplementation that can reduce the risk or prevent the condition from becoming disease.  What if more people used the genetic testing data to focus on changing their lifestyles and nutrition habits to prevent disease?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An additional angle on this is the whole prevention side of the equation.  Just because you have a certain gene sequence doesn&#8217;t mean you will actually get the disease.  Many of the body&#8217;s systems controlled by genes are modifiable via nutrition and supplementation that can reduce the risk or prevent the condition from becoming disease.  What if more people used the genetic testing data to focus on changing their lifestyles and nutrition habits to prevent disease?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
