<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of Cable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/in-defense-of-cable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/in-defense-of-cable/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cheap(er) Ways to Stay Entertained During the Downturn &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/in-defense-of-cable/#comment-923133</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheap(er) Ways to Stay Entertained During the Downturn &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25267#comment-923133</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] few months ago, I defended the value of cable, writing that $70 a month wasn&#8217;t a bad deal for what you get. But as your wallet gets [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few months ago, I defended the value of cable, writing that $70 a month wasn&#8217;t a bad deal for what you get. But as your wallet gets [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Tarczon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/in-defense-of-cable/#comment-906720</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Tarczon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25267#comment-906720</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great comments and great topic, but let&#039;s not think of this as an all or nothing debate.  Today, web video is at a point where it is a supplement to existing PayTV services.  HULU and other sites are good as virtual DVRs (and great chances to find other shows); however, when my colleagues tested consumer preference, 83% of broadband households chose the TV as the primary viewing platform.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So let&#039;s jump into the not-so-distant future and suppose HULU or ABC’s Hi-Def player are coming to the TV screen. Suddenly you have a much more compelling argument for open platforms and web delivery... well sans sport, but we&#039;re getting closer.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For now, expect to maintain a blended model-the efficiencies of paytv delivery with the selectivity (in terms of time and content) of web-based video.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments and great topic, but let&#8217;s not think of this as an all or nothing debate.  Today, web video is at a point where it is a supplement to existing PayTV services.  HULU and other sites are good as virtual DVRs (and great chances to find other shows); however, when my colleagues tested consumer preference, 83% of broadband households chose the TV as the primary viewing platform.</p>

<p>So let&#8217;s jump into the not-so-distant future and suppose HULU or ABC’s Hi-Def player are coming to the TV screen. Suddenly you have a much more compelling argument for open platforms and web delivery&#8230; well sans sport, but we&#8217;re getting closer.</p>

<p>For now, expect to maintain a blended model-the efficiencies of paytv delivery with the selectivity (in terms of time and content) of web-based video.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/in-defense-of-cable/#comment-906715</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25267#comment-906715</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Your math also skips over one important fact: no TV shows put out 52 episodes a year.  To assume that I watch 10 shows a week, and would be paying for them on iTunes totally misses the fact that over half the time I&#039;m watching a re-run.  I can watch that show on iTunes again as well, I just don&#039;t have to pay for it again.  I don&#039;t know how long I&#039;ve been waiting for a new episode of Lost, but Comcast certainly isn&#039;t discounting my bill in the meantime...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your math also skips over one important fact: no TV shows put out 52 episodes a year.  To assume that I watch 10 shows a week, and would be paying for them on iTunes totally misses the fact that over half the time I&#8217;m watching a re-run.  I can watch that show on iTunes again as well, I just don&#8217;t have to pay for it again.  I don&#8217;t know how long I&#8217;ve been waiting for a new episode of Lost, but Comcast certainly isn&#8217;t discounting my bill in the meantime&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave's Football Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/in-defense-of-cable/#comment-906639</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave's Football Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25267#comment-906639</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s one thing that Apple TV offers that most cable and satellite providers can&#039;t/won&#039;t -- free video podcasts. That&#039;s a mighty huge catalog of video that people can download and watch without paying a dime, and while finding the good stuff can be tricky, there&#039;s something worthwhile out there for everyone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m paying $1,100/year for non-HD satellite TV, largely because I&#039;m a sports fan/blogger. ($180 of that is Setanta Sports. Gotta have my Premier League and Aussie Rules fixes.) If Apple TV could stream the ESPN channels or ESPN360 and a soccer channel or two, even in non-HD, I&#039;d have to consider it. Disney owns ESPN and Steve Jobs has a huge stake in Disney, so you&#039;d have to think they could find a way to make this happen if they wanted to.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That said, it would probably require too many companies cooperating with each other, which never happens anymore. Plus, cable companies would probably punish ESPN for making a deal with Apple.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s one thing that Apple TV offers that most cable and satellite providers can&#8217;t/won&#8217;t &#8212; free video podcasts. That&#8217;s a mighty huge catalog of video that people can download and watch without paying a dime, and while finding the good stuff can be tricky, there&#8217;s something worthwhile out there for everyone.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m paying $1,100/year for non-HD satellite TV, largely because I&#8217;m a sports fan/blogger. ($180 of that is Setanta Sports. Gotta have my Premier League and Aussie Rules fixes.) If Apple TV could stream the ESPN channels or ESPN360 and a soccer channel or two, even in non-HD, I&#8217;d have to consider it. Disney owns ESPN and Steve Jobs has a huge stake in Disney, so you&#8217;d have to think they could find a way to make this happen if they wanted to.</p>

<p>That said, it would probably require too many companies cooperating with each other, which never happens anymore. Plus, cable companies would probably punish ESPN for making a deal with Apple.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cb</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/in-defense-of-cable/#comment-906601</link>
		<dc:creator>cb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25267#comment-906601</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You pay $800.00 for cable and you get bandwidth that is so slow and behind in comparison with other countries.  At the same time, you get forced fed corporate speak news -dumb down style with commercials.  This is called let&#039;s continue to put the screws to the dumb public. Is it our fault for not fighting back or is it that they don&#039;t care what we say?  Keep in mind the communications companies have great friends in Congress and the Senate who they help elect.  I say speak with your wallets because as we continue in this economic downturn it won&#039;t be long before you&#039;ll choose food over cable.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You pay $800.00 for cable and you get bandwidth that is so slow and behind in comparison with other countries.  At the same time, you get forced fed corporate speak news -dumb down style with commercials.  This is called let&#8217;s continue to put the screws to the dumb public. Is it our fault for not fighting back or is it that they don&#8217;t care what we say?  Keep in mind the communications companies have great friends in Congress and the Senate who they help elect.  I say speak with your wallets because as we continue in this economic downturn it won&#8217;t be long before you&#8217;ll choose food over cable.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: online meeting reviews</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/in-defense-of-cable/#comment-906597</link>
		<dc:creator>online meeting reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25267#comment-906597</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yea don&#039;t do it if you like sports. Comcast also has a ton of shows for free available on it&#039;s website. They even have premium cable shows available to watch online. Hulu is probably the best, but has a lot of clips to sort through.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea don&#8217;t do it if you like sports. Comcast also has a ton of shows for free available on it&#8217;s website. They even have premium cable shows available to watch online. Hulu is probably the best, but has a lot of clips to sort through.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Panton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/in-defense-of-cable/#comment-906565</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Panton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25267#comment-906565</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There is a critical difference between iTunes and cable/sky.
There are no advertising breaks in an iTunes show.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Depending on what you figure you time is worth, that
10 mins saved out of every tv hour - 400 mins a month
in your example - will pay for a &lt;em&gt;lot&lt;/em&gt; of downloads.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a critical difference between iTunes and cable/sky.
There are no advertising breaks in an iTunes show.</p>

<p>Depending on what you figure you time is worth, that
10 mins saved out of every tv hour &#8211; 400 mins a month
in your example &#8211; will pay for a <em>lot</em> of downloads.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ericabiz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/in-defense-of-cable/#comment-906511</link>
		<dc:creator>ericabiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25267#comment-906511</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have the best of all worlds. I have a TiVo, hooked up to Comcast. I originally had the digital cable +++ package (whatever they&#039;re calling it these days), but when my 6-month special expired I simply downgraded to Limited Basic.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Still have the TiVo; it still records all my network shows in HD. Subscribed to Netflix to get some movies that I would have otherwise gotten from the premium channels.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In all, I pay -$.85/month for the cable subscription (yes, you read that right -- Comcast offers a 2-package discount, and Limited Basic is cheaper than the discount) + $18/mo for Netflix, instead of $80/month.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Saving $60/month and getting more content than I had before = awesome!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Erica&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the best of all worlds. I have a TiVo, hooked up to Comcast. I originally had the digital cable +++ package (whatever they&#8217;re calling it these days), but when my 6-month special expired I simply downgraded to Limited Basic.</p>

<p>Still have the TiVo; it still records all my network shows in HD. Subscribed to Netflix to get some movies that I would have otherwise gotten from the premium channels.</p>

<p>In all, I pay -$.85/month for the cable subscription (yes, you read that right &#8212; Comcast offers a 2-package discount, and Limited Basic is cheaper than the discount) + $18/mo for Netflix, instead of $80/month.</p>

<p>Saving $60/month and getting more content than I had before = awesome!</p>

<p>-Erica</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuyLowSellHigh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/in-defense-of-cable/#comment-906498</link>
		<dc:creator>BuyLowSellHigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25267#comment-906498</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So what you&#039;re saying is that if:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1) I am addicted to sports, or
2) I have a large, diverse family, who I think should pick and choose whatever cable programs they want to watch&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then cable is the better option?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Of course these are fine reasons for a lot of people to choose cable, but if the rest are better off with pay-per-use then that&#039;s good news to me, because &quot;the rest&quot;, then, is a pretty big group of people,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sorry, but I think the quality of GigaOM has deteriorated a lot over the last year. The whole war against pay-per-bandwidth never made sense to me and I think this falls in the same category: A pandering to the established media outlets that&#039;s hard to ignore when GigaOM is, in fact, a part of that etablishment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what you&#8217;re saying is that if:</p>

<p>1) I am addicted to sports, or
2) I have a large, diverse family, who I think should pick and choose whatever cable programs they want to watch</p>

<p>Then cable is the better option?</p>

<p>Of course these are fine reasons for a lot of people to choose cable, but if the rest are better off with pay-per-use then that&#8217;s good news to me, because &#8220;the rest&#8221;, then, is a pretty big group of people,</p>

<p>Sorry, but I think the quality of GigaOM has deteriorated a lot over the last year. The whole war against pay-per-bandwidth never made sense to me and I think this falls in the same category: A pandering to the established media outlets that&#8217;s hard to ignore when GigaOM is, in fact, a part of that etablishment.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdrake90</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/21/in-defense-of-cable/#comment-906481</link>
		<dc:creator>jdrake90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=25267#comment-906481</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think that&#039;s the beauty of Hulu.... all the shows you want to watch for free. If the kids really want that 11th show - tell them to watch it online and save the money. Or watch everything on line (thats what I do) and spend nothing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s the beauty of Hulu&#8230;. all the shows you want to watch for free. If the kids really want that 11th show &#8211; tell them to watch it online and save the money. Or watch everything on line (thats what I do) and spend nothing.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
