<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What If You Ran an Ad, and Nobody Saw It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/10/14/what-if-you-ran-an-ad-and-nobody-saw-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/14/what-if-you-ran-an-ad-and-nobody-saw-it/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:44:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Dosquatch Says&#8230; &#187; What If You Ran an Ad, and Nobody Saw It? &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/14/what-if-you-ran-an-ad-and-nobody-saw-it/#comment-984930</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dosquatch Says&#8230; &#187; What If You Ran an Ad, and Nobody Saw It? &#8211; GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24838#comment-984930</guid>
		<description>[...] In a &#8220;shocking&#8221; revelation, the Nielsen/Norman Group has found that people won’t see [banner] ads at all. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a &#8220;shocking&#8221; revelation, the Nielsen/Norman Group has found that people won’t see [banner] ads at all. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Do Email Blasts Have to Do With Local SEO? &#124; The Adventures of SEO Boy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/14/what-if-you-ran-an-ad-and-nobody-saw-it/#comment-969838</link>
		<dc:creator>What Do Email Blasts Have to Do With Local SEO? &#124; The Adventures of SEO Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24838#comment-969838</guid>
		<description>[...] if they&#8217;re creative, online web-space. But that&#8217;s not what we&#8217;re after. Due to banner ad blindness and just general ad avoidance, these methods don&#8217;t seem to generate the response justified by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if they&#8217;re creative, online web-space. But that&#8217;s not what we&#8217;re after. Due to banner ad blindness and just general ad avoidance, these methods don&#8217;t seem to generate the response justified by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR, Public Relations &#38; communications news and features</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/14/what-if-you-ran-an-ad-and-nobody-saw-it/#comment-954438</link>
		<dc:creator>PR, Public Relations &#38; communications news and features</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24838#comment-954438</guid>
		<description>[...] Last October at the Boston Web Experience Forum, Internet usability expert Jakob Nielsen talked about ‘banner blindness’, something he’s been discussing for a few years. Based on a study of 3000 web users, Nielsen found “Ads might as well not exist as far as users are concerned, except for search ads.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last October at the Boston Web Experience Forum, Internet usability expert Jakob Nielsen talked about ‘banner blindness’, something he’s been discussing for a few years. Based on a study of 3000 web users, Nielsen found “Ads might as well not exist as far as users are concerned, except for search ads.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should a Company Use Banner Ads in Its Marketing Mix? (Part 2) &#124; The Executive Whisper</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/14/what-if-you-ran-an-ad-and-nobody-saw-it/#comment-920352</link>
		<dc:creator>Should a Company Use Banner Ads in Its Marketing Mix? (Part 2) &#124; The Executive Whisper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 22:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24838#comment-920352</guid>
		<description>[...] recently as October 2008, Nielsen again confirmed, &#8220;Ads might as well not exist as far as users are concerned, except for search ads.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently as October 2008, Nielsen again confirmed, &ldquo;Ads might as well not exist as far as users are concerned, except for search ads.&rdquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bannerwerbung wirkt! : The Strategy Web</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/14/what-if-you-ran-an-ad-and-nobody-saw-it/#comment-919378</link>
		<dc:creator>Bannerwerbung wirkt! : The Strategy Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 14:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24838#comment-919378</guid>
		<description>[...] unter dem Motto: Bannerwerbung wirkt. Warum&#8230;? Gigacom publiziert einen Artikel mit der Frage: What if you ran an ad, and nobody saw it? Der Artikel besch&#228;ftigt sich mit dem Thema Banner Advertising gegen&#252;ber [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unter dem Motto: Bannerwerbung wirkt. Warum&#8230;? Gigacom publiziert einen Artikel mit der Frage: What if you ran an ad, and nobody saw it? Der Artikel besch&#228;ftigt sich mit dem Thema Banner Advertising gegen&#252;ber [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gruppo36 &#187; La lenta agonia del banner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/14/what-if-you-ran-an-ad-and-nobody-saw-it/#comment-918900</link>
		<dc:creator>Gruppo36 &#187; La lenta agonia del banner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24838#comment-918900</guid>
		<description>[...] il massimo esperto di usabilità a livello mondiale, in un suo intervento sottolineava il fatto che ormai le persone non prestino più attenzione ai banner. Sempre Nielsen ha ricordato però che tale problema non colpisce il search advertising, ossia la [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] il massimo esperto di usabilità a livello mondiale, in un suo intervento sottolineava il fatto che ormai le persone non prestino più attenzione ai banner. Sempre Nielsen ha ricordato però che tale problema non colpisce il search advertising, ossia la [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: art 2: Should a Company Use Banner Ads in Its Marketing Mix? &#124; Microsite.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/14/what-if-you-ran-an-ad-and-nobody-saw-it/#comment-916350</link>
		<dc:creator>art 2: Should a Company Use Banner Ads in Its Marketing Mix? &#124; Microsite.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24838#comment-916350</guid>
		<description>[...] recently as October 2008, Nielsen again confirmed, &#8220;Ads might as well not exist as far as users are concerned, except for search ads.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently as October 2008, Nielsen again confirmed, &ldquo;Ads might as well not exist as far as users are concerned, except for search ads.&rdquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Il Banner è morto, viva il Banner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/14/what-if-you-ran-an-ad-and-nobody-saw-it/#comment-916239</link>
		<dc:creator>Il Banner è morto, viva il Banner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24838#comment-916239</guid>
		<description>[...] Un mese e mezzo fa Jakob Nielsen ribadiva per l&#8217;ennesima volta che i navigatori sono ormai tutti affetti da banner blindness, e che le persone &#8220;won’t see ads at all&#8220;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Un mese e mezzo fa Jakob Nielsen ribadiva per l&#8217;ennesima volta che i navigatori sono ormai tutti affetti da banner blindness, e che le persone &#8220;won’t see ads at all&#8220;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Sem&#187; Archivi Blog &#187; Il Banner è morto, viva il Banner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/14/what-if-you-ran-an-ad-and-nobody-saw-it/#comment-916208</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Sem&#187; Archivi Blog &#187; Il Banner è morto, viva il Banner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24838#comment-916208</guid>
		<description>[...] volta che i navigatori sono ormai tutti affetti da banner blindness, e che le persone “won’t see ads at all“. Altri sono arrivati a dire che il display advertising virerà in negativo nel 2009, dopo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] volta che i navigatori sono ormai tutti affetti da banner blindness, e che le persone “won’t see ads at all“. Altri sono arrivati a dire che il display advertising virerà in negativo nel 2009, dopo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are Banner Ads Dying? &#124; Blind Five Year Old</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/14/what-if-you-ran-an-ad-and-nobody-saw-it/#comment-912282</link>
		<dc:creator>Are Banner Ads Dying? &#124; Blind Five Year Old</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24838#comment-912282</guid>
		<description>[...] of them do use banner ads, but more and more evidence shows a growing banner blindness on these sites. I suspect the high number of visits (for a very specific purpose) exacerbates [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of them do use banner ads, but more and more evidence shows a growing banner blindness on these sites. I suspect the high number of visits (for a very specific purpose) exacerbates [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.1440 Tech Blender — IT Staffing and Development: Sage Advice, Insight &#38; Delight &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Do I Get More People to My Website?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/14/what-if-you-ran-an-ad-and-nobody-saw-it/#comment-908981</link>
		<dc:creator>G.1440 Tech Blender — IT Staffing and Development: Sage Advice, Insight &#38; Delight &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Do I Get More People to My Website?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24838#comment-908981</guid>
		<description>[...] to see what they&#8217;re looking at.  In fact, some of the latest research shows that online ads don&#8217;t really work well [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to see what they&#8217;re looking at.  In fact, some of the latest research shows that online ads don&#8217;t really work well [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Banner Blindheit? Nicht hier&#8230; &#124;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/14/what-if-you-ran-an-ad-and-nobody-saw-it/#comment-908489</link>
		<dc:creator>Banner Blindheit? Nicht hier&#8230; &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24838#comment-908489</guid>
		<description>[...] Banner Blindness: Old and New Findings oder What If You Ran an Ad, and Nobody Saw It?  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Banner Blindness: Old and New Findings oder What If You Ran an Ad, and Nobody Saw It?  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakob Nielsen und weitere über Usability</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/14/what-if-you-ran-an-ad-and-nobody-saw-it/#comment-907596</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob Nielsen und weitere über Usability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24838#comment-907596</guid>
		<description>[...] kennt nicht den Usabilty Guru Jakob Nielsen. Er h&#228;lt hier noch einmal fest, dass Werbebanner nichts bringen, bezahlte Suche schon. Also, wer mal etwas zur [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kennt nicht den Usabilty Guru Jakob Nielsen. Er h&#228;lt hier noch einmal fest, dass Werbebanner nichts bringen, bezahlte Suche schon. Also, wer mal etwas zur [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair Croll</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/14/what-if-you-ran-an-ad-and-nobody-saw-it/#comment-907042</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair Croll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24838#comment-907042</guid>
		<description>@dougschumacher Just to be clear, the test wasn&#039;t about ads. These were tests of many (thousands) of different real websites, many of which had ads. In the course of tracking eye movement, the tests counted how often visitors looked at ads. Virtually none even glanced at them. So the ads were, I believe, a good cross-section of the world.

If there&#039;s evidence that nobody looks at ads, and there&#039;s evidence that some ads get clicks, and the two data sources are reliable, that suggests to me that clickfraud is much more prevalent and better hidden than we suspect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dougschumacher Just to be clear, the test wasn&#8217;t about ads. These were tests of many (thousands) of different real websites, many of which had ads. In the course of tracking eye movement, the tests counted how often visitors looked at ads. Virtually none even glanced at them. So the ads were, I believe, a good cross-section of the world.</p>
<p>If there&#8217;s evidence that nobody looks at ads, and there&#8217;s evidence that some ads get clicks, and the two data sources are reliable, that suggests to me that clickfraud is much more prevalent and better hidden than we suspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiyoshi Martinez - nerdlusus blog &#8211; Advertising plunge will kill newspapers &#8212; and there won&#8217;t be a bailout</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/14/what-if-you-ran-an-ad-and-nobody-saw-it/#comment-906487</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiyoshi Martinez - nerdlusus blog &#8211; Advertising plunge will kill newspapers &#8212; and there won&#8217;t be a bailout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24838#comment-906487</guid>
		<description>[...] abandon in the near future. GigaOm reported this shocking tidbit from Jakob Nielsen that users ignore display advertising online and have developed a sort of &#8220;blindness&#8221; to these types of ads. Imagine how tough an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] abandon in the near future. GigaOm reported this shocking tidbit from Jakob Nielsen that users ignore display advertising online and have developed a sort of &#8220;blindness&#8221; to these types of ads. Imagine how tough an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dougschumacher</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/14/what-if-you-ran-an-ad-and-nobody-saw-it/#comment-906393</link>
		<dc:creator>dougschumacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24838#comment-906393</guid>
		<description>1. The vast majority of ads, banner or otherwise, are dreck. Nothing distinct, with little persuasive value. (Even most ad people won&#039;t argue with that.) So to make a sweeping claim about all &#039;picture&#039; ads is a gross generalization.

2. I&#039;d guess, based on experience, that this test used the dreck variety of ads for their sample study. If they don&#039;t address the creative impact as a key component, then they probably don&#039;t get the difference.

3. There are numerous tests that indicate that banner ads work quite well. Why are major advertisers who&#039;ve built powerful brands continuing to run them (see adverlicious&#039; examples above). These companies see extensive cost and ROI data come in week after week.And they continue to run the ads.

4. I think Mr. Nielsen&#039;s long history of insights on design is great ... if you&#039;re designing pure information with little emotional value. Think dictionaries, government resource sites, and data presentation. But for the emotional stuff, I&#039;ll take the style sensibility of a site like GigaOm over Nielsen&#039;s nngroup.com ANY day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. The vast majority of ads, banner or otherwise, are dreck. Nothing distinct, with little persuasive value. (Even most ad people won&#8217;t argue with that.) So to make a sweeping claim about all &#8216;picture&#8217; ads is a gross generalization.</p>
<p>2. I&#8217;d guess, based on experience, that this test used the dreck variety of ads for their sample study. If they don&#8217;t address the creative impact as a key component, then they probably don&#8217;t get the difference.</p>
<p>3. There are numerous tests that indicate that banner ads work quite well. Why are major advertisers who&#8217;ve built powerful brands continuing to run them (see adverlicious&#8217; examples above). These companies see extensive cost and ROI data come in week after week.And they continue to run the ads.</p>
<p>4. I think Mr. Nielsen&#8217;s long history of insights on design is great &#8230; if you&#8217;re designing pure information with little emotional value. Think dictionaries, government resource sites, and data presentation. But for the emotional stuff, I&#8217;ll take the style sensibility of a site like GigaOm over Nielsen&#8217;s nngroup.com ANY day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
