<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#039;m Talking Tech on Yahoo TechTicker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/im-talking-tech-on-yahoo-techticker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/im-talking-tech-on-yahoo-techticker/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:31:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/im-talking-tech-on-yahoo-techticker/#comment-149966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=24677#comment-149966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Xavier

Thanks for the nice comments. At least you got a sense of my game plan. Looking forward to seeing you.

@k... thanks .. very kind of you to say so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Xavier</p>
<p>Thanks for the nice comments. At least you got a sense of my game plan. Looking forward to seeing you.</p>
<p>@k&#8230; thanks .. very kind of you to say so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/im-talking-tech-on-yahoo-techticker/#comment-149965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=24677#comment-149965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You should do more interviews, Om!
I&#039;m no fan of Sarah Lacy but this was good. Thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should do more interviews, Om!<br />
I&#8217;m no fan of Sarah Lacy but this was good. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xavier Casanova</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/im-talking-tech-on-yahoo-techticker/#comment-149964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xavier Casanova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=24677#comment-149964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Insightful - especially segment 2 where you talk about why online revenues are falling for newspapers. Your point about excess inventory and lack of differentiation amongst leading papers as a cause for online revenue stagnation never occurred to me.

It&#039;s true that there is a lot of duplicate content out there and perhaps we are also seeing the effect of Google favoring original/niche content. I also think you&#039;re right about content focus and audience segmentation. The problem then becomes the business model scalability. I guess I better understand now why you&#039;re creating a network focused content sites under the GigaOM umbrella rather than trying to build a monolithic block like CNET etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insightful &#8211; especially segment 2 where you talk about why online revenues are falling for newspapers. Your point about excess inventory and lack of differentiation amongst leading papers as a cause for online revenue stagnation never occurred to me.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that there is a lot of duplicate content out there and perhaps we are also seeing the effect of Google favoring original/niche content. I also think you&#8217;re right about content focus and audience segmentation. The problem then becomes the business model scalability. I guess I better understand now why you&#8217;re creating a network focused content sites under the GigaOM umbrella rather than trying to build a monolithic block like CNET etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

