<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: America May Get Broadband for Free, But Porn Will Cost You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/america-may-get-broadband-for-free-but-porn-will-cost-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/america-may-get-broadband-for-free-but-porn-will-cost-you/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Project198</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/america-may-get-broadband-for-free-but-porn-will-cost-you/#comment-950838</link>
		<dc:creator>Project198</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 03:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24640#comment-950838</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the government needs to stay out of the net&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the government needs to stay out of the net</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCC To Rule on Nationwide Porn-Free Wireless Web - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/america-may-get-broadband-for-free-but-porn-will-cost-you/#comment-915820</link>
		<dc:creator>FCC To Rule on Nationwide Porn-Free Wireless Web - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24640#comment-915820</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] objectionable content for everyone, but in October, when the FCC issued a report saying that such a network wouldn&#8217;t interfere with T-Mobile&#8217;s network, a spokesman for the regulatory agency said the filtering provisions would only be aimed at [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] objectionable content for everyone, but in October, when the FCC issued a report saying that such a network wouldn&#8217;t interfere with T-Mobile&#8217;s network, a spokesman for the regulatory agency said the filtering provisions would only be aimed at [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unleashing the Moore’s Law of radios at last &#124; Programming Archive</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/america-may-get-broadband-for-free-but-porn-will-cost-you/#comment-905294</link>
		<dc:creator>Unleashing the Moore’s Law of radios at last &#124; Programming Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24640#comment-905294</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] is natural that incumbents will argue anywhere and everywhere against such choices. A free, open Internet market will mean higher costs and thinner [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is natural that incumbents will argue anywhere and everywhere against such choices. A free, open Internet market will mean higher costs and thinner [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Keels</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/america-may-get-broadband-for-free-but-porn-will-cost-you/#comment-904915</link>
		<dc:creator>John Keels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 03:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24640#comment-904915</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Ted Murphy,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You would argue that we need small government right?  Then why are you arguing for big government to intrude in our lives on the internet?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Ted Murphy,</p>

<p>You would argue that we need small government right?  Then why are you arguing for big government to intrude in our lives on the internet?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Murphy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/america-may-get-broadband-for-free-but-porn-will-cost-you/#comment-904898</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24640#comment-904898</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I kind of think the Internet should have rules.  The cesspool of misinformation is also a cesspool of copyright theft and pornography.  I&#039;d like to see some rules made and enforced to manage all three of those.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of think the Internet should have rules.  The cesspool of misinformation is also a cesspool of copyright theft and pornography.  I&#8217;d like to see some rules made and enforced to manage all three of those.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack JHones</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/america-may-get-broadband-for-free-but-porn-will-cost-you/#comment-904828</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack JHones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24640#comment-904828</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think you really hit the nail on the head this time around! Very nice.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Jiff
www.privacy.de.tc&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you really hit the nail on the head this time around! Very nice.</p>

<p>Jiff
<a href="http://www.privacy.de.tc" rel="nofollow">http://www.privacy.de.tc</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/america-may-get-broadband-for-free-but-porn-will-cost-you/#comment-904817</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24640#comment-904817</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Any info on what wireless protocol M2Z plans to use (CDMA, LTE, UMB, WIMAX ?)  LTE would seem a good choice given its likely near-global deployment from 2010 on.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any info on what wireless protocol M2Z plans to use (CDMA, LTE, UMB, WIMAX ?)  LTE would seem a good choice given its likely near-global deployment from 2010 on.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grappi!</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/america-may-get-broadband-for-free-but-porn-will-cost-you/#comment-904803</link>
		<dc:creator>Grappi!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24640#comment-904803</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Vía   Sigue la respuesta a esta entrada RSS 2.0 con el feed.  Puedes dejar una respuesta, o el trackback desde tu propio sitio.  Tags: america, FCC, Internet, red inalámbrica, T-Mobile, usa, wifi, wireless [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vía   Sigue la respuesta a esta entrada RSS 2.0 con el feed.  Puedes dejar una respuesta, o el trackback desde tu propio sitio.  Tags: america, FCC, Internet, red inalámbrica, T-Mobile, usa, wifi, wireless [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaelportent</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/america-may-get-broadband-for-free-but-porn-will-cost-you/#comment-904769</link>
		<dc:creator>michaelportent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24640#comment-904769</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No way in hell this well ever see the light of day. Anyone and everyone who charges for WiFi service in America presently will fight it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We can dream though...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way in hell this well ever see the light of day. Anyone and everyone who charges for WiFi service in America presently will fight it.</p>

<p>We can dream though&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Source mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/america-may-get-broadband-for-free-but-porn-will-cost-you/#comment-904698</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24640#comment-904698</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] providers on their own lines and buy up wireless spectrum. It is natural that incumbents will argue anywhere and everywhere against such choices. A free, open Internet market will mean higher costs and thinner margins. But [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] providers on their own lines and buy up wireless spectrum. It is natural that incumbents will argue anywhere and everywhere against such choices. A free, open Internet market will mean higher costs and thinner margins. But [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason@tinyCrunch</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/america-may-get-broadband-for-free-but-porn-will-cost-you/#comment-904588</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason@tinyCrunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24640#comment-904588</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This would be a huge step forward for getting the rest of America online as well as enabling technologies like VoIP to really have an impact. Ultimately, I donn&#039;t think it will happen because it could lead to a loss of revenues/jobs for a lot of carriers/ISP&#039;s. They will find a way to screw this up somehow, whether it is a lawsuit, restrictions, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be a huge step forward for getting the rest of America online as well as enabling technologies like VoIP to really have an impact. Ultimately, I donn&#8217;t think it will happen because it could lead to a loss of revenues/jobs for a lot of carriers/ISP&#8217;s. They will find a way to screw this up somehow, whether it is a lawsuit, restrictions, etc.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Wilensky</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/america-may-get-broadband-for-free-but-porn-will-cost-you/#comment-904580</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Wilensky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24640#comment-904580</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, intermod is a big problem, and tuning the traps and cavities for each site and close freq allocations is a pain when all you hire is low level techs. They don&#039;t want to give each site engineer a RF spectrum analyzer and the time to trap and tune for adjacent band rejection. Thousands of sites and few resources...so sue those who might lie a few mhz away.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, intermod is a big problem, and tuning the traps and cavities for each site and close freq allocations is a pain when all you hire is low level techs. They don&#8217;t want to give each site engineer a RF spectrum analyzer and the time to trap and tune for adjacent band rejection. Thousands of sites and few resources&#8230;so sue those who might lie a few mhz away.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/america-may-get-broadband-for-free-but-porn-will-cost-you/#comment-904546</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=24640#comment-904546</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If this really does get auctioned there is zero chance it won&#039;t be bought by an incumbent or an incumbent&#039;s proxy. So, what effect could it have on competition? Now if it were made unlicensed or at least non-exclusively licensed . . .&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this really does get auctioned there is zero chance it won&#8217;t be bought by an incumbent or an incumbent&#8217;s proxy. So, what effect could it have on competition? Now if it were made unlicensed or at least non-exclusively licensed . . .</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
