83 Comments

Summary:

A month after its launch, Google’s much talked about browser, Chrome seems to have seen a slow decline in usage according to some reports. It now accounts for 5.6% of all visits to this blog, though the number varies for our other blogs, indicating that Chrome is still an early adopter phenomenon.

Google Chrome BrowserEarlier this week, Profy.com’s Svetlana Gladkova sent an email reminding me that Google’s Chrome Browser was one month old. How time flies, and how quickly we forget: or at least I did. After my initial few posts and thoughts, Google Chrome has fallen off my attention radar since it is not available for my preferred computing platform – OSX X. I typically divide my browsing time between Safari and Camino.

I have checked it out occasionally by booting it up on Windows running via Parallels on my MacBook. Apparently, I am part of the median: Svetlana has been tracking the usage using Google Analytics, Clicky and Net Applications has seen a gradual decline in the usage. Gone is the download Chrome link from the Google home page. She points out that there are some fixes the browser needs and as a result Google might be quietly taking a step back. (Related Post: Why Chrome isn’t a killer browser just yet.)

Svetlana is right in being cautious on the chances of the Google browser, though I am not sure how to view the fact that it now accounts for about 5.6% of the traffic to GigaOM and now ranks as the fourth most usage browser. Across our network, here Chrome’s share of total visits by site: 6.13% (jkOnTheRun), 5.78% (OStatic), 5.06% (WebWorkerDaily), 3.09% (NewTeeVee), 2.43% (Earth2Tech) and 2.24% (TheAppleblog). [If you want to share information about your website/service in comments, it would be pretty cool.]

Those numbers can of course mean many things, like I have a lot of readers at Google. Of course, they remind me that I need to use Windows more often. Jokes aside, I think Google isn’t likely to give up on this browser for anytime soon. There are many reasons why they won’t let it become their Waterloo.

Google has realized that web is no more a mere collection of plain web pages or simple interface to databases. If not today then sometime in the near future we would expect equality in the experience (if not feature parity) between desktop and web applications. It is a future where browsers can’t be just html renderers but containers for a runtime environment. Anyway follow Svetlana – I have a sneaky suspicion she would be following Chrome’s progress (or lack of it) for a while.

  1. I’ve already installed and uninstalled Chrome. I have no desire to use it again.

    Share
  2. The current release of Chrome is just about getting it out of the door, with most of the value lying in scaring Ballmer and Co a teeny weeny bit. The actual value is when the apps shape up around it (none of the apps that currently support it on Google, especially Docs, work reasonably well offline with it now) to the extent where they can be used on a daily basis.

    Interestingly, that is when they will also open up weird anti-trust avenues for B&C to attack them. We are headed for interesting times.

    Share
  3. I installed Chrome on day one, and after a week of use, was unable to return to firefox except for the occasion instance where I needed a plugin and didn’t want to install it in Chrome. After a week, firefox seemed to take a loooong time to startup (relative to Chrome) and pages take forever to load (again, relative to Chrome).

    So far, it’s been great, and I don’t really understand the snark against it (see jenkins, above). Chrome is super fast, very stable, and has some very nice features. It doesn’t change the world, but it’s a very nice browser for Windows. It is significantly faster and more stable than firefox or explorer. If you just remove the love vs hate of google, it’s hard to see why every windows user wouldn’t be using this.

    Share
  4. Yes, a nice browser, slightly fast than FF in some circumstances, yes. A game changer? No. Google will find it more difficult than anticipated to uproot an entrenched market. Still, have at it, boys.

    Share
  5. Just as RC said, I now use Chrome for most of the browsing, for the rest I use Firefox when I need a plugin or a feature not yet available in Chrome. It is very fast, very stable, very easy on eyes.
    I think the beta version is mostly for letting the world be aware of its presence and that a runtime environment version is not far off.

    Share
  6. Fast, so I like to use it for Google Reader, but then I cannot save things into Zotero – my reference tool. Can’t use it for gmail, because it doesn’t support GTDInbox addon. I use Google Apps, so therefore use same browser for Mail, Docs ..
    Until it gets the ecosystem around it, I cannot use it as much as I would like to.

    Share
  7. 0.36% of over 200,000 visitors to our website – Edge Hill University in the UK. Chrome has a long way to go before it’s adopted by the mainstream.

    Share
  8. I love some of the Chrome features, but the lack of extensions is killing me. There is a way to get some Greasemonkey scripts to run in Chrome, which is pretty nice. http://www.budboytech.com/home/2008/10/3/how-to-run-greasemonkey-scripts-in-chrome-sort-of.html

    Share
  9. My site is 90% Windows users. In September, 3.42% of our users were using Chrome, right behind Safari which accounted for 3.44%.

    Share
  10. Spot checking a half dozen of the sites I manage with traffic ranging from 15k to 150k unique visitors over the course of the last month, Chrome numbers never rose over 1%. The majority of what I’ve seen is less than .5%, in fact.

    Share
  11. I have really enjoyed the browser overall, but I am waiting for my have to have password program, RoboForm, to port. I got way to many passwords to remember, and do not trust browser password managers (and have had spotty success).

    Presently on my site, Chrome checks in at 4th place with a paltry 3.07%. Firefox checks in at 47.18%, IE at 43.78%, and Safari at 4.23%. The remaining browsers make up less than 2% of traffic to my site.

    Share
  12. I do think people will see the benefit of using it if they try it out. I downloaded 30 days ago and have seen an increase in productivity just due to the fact that heavy Javascript/AJAX sites run much faster than Firefox.

    I did a complete personal review, which I invite you to read here http://cli.gs/S3TeeU

    Share
  13. I still don’t understand why all the negative feedbacks about Chrome. Ever since its release I use it strictly as replacement to IE. It is extremely fast, and the look is very nice and simple. However, I still use Firefox when watching video. But I also installed the chromifox add-on to make it look like Chrome. Firefox might have a better chance with Chrome. But as far as IE concerns, I stop using it completely.

    Share
  14. the initial land/IP grab in the original EULA speaks volumes about Google’s intentions – not pro user – recent patent publications too look fairly week … me thinks they have real competition outside core search – a very good thing

    Share
  15. I have also installed the Google chrome, i use it sometimes, regarding searching for news and stuff. But there are a lot of things that firefox makes it easier to browse than Chrome.

    http://www.blograzy.com

    Share
  16. 4.06%! That’s an awesome market share, for only being able to support one OS (the lesser one on my site) and only being around for 1 month!

    Awesome :D

    Share
  17. It’s my fave browser (On Windows) and will stay like this for a bit to come. Biggest thing I hate about it, no OS X.

    Share
  18. Typo: what operating system are you using called OX X?

    “…my preferred computing platform – OX X. I typically divide…”

    Share
  19. I have converted to chrome, except for a few sites that don’t render well in it. The biggest plus is the ability to kill Flash plugins without disturbing the rest of the setup. Flash seems to go on to 20-30% CPU quite often.

    Share
  20. Tried Chrome on day 1 and immediately got hooked and switched (from Safari). Really fast, clean; love the pull out tabs feature. Other little goodies too, like if you do a search, the locations show up as bars on the scrollbar. Bookmark handling is still a pain though: import isn’t reliable and no way to export. I don’t use plugins much, that wasn’t an issue for me.

    BTW, Firefox 3 crashes regularly for me on both my 32 bit laptop and 64 bit desktop, very frustrating. I’m surprised others aren’t seeing this.

    Share
  21. chrome is ok-ish, short on killer features, would be killer if I didn’t use opera, and know all of it’s features, which, by the way, leave every other browser on Earth in the dust.
    Firefox pisses me off, clunky workflow missing loads of features, and no, I am not a fan of installing enless fixes, er, plug-ins.
    I just wish more, er, all web developers would ‘allow’ opera to work with their sites.

    Share
  22. I use Chrome at work and I just cannot go back to Firefox or IE just because of it spure speed and simplicity. At home I am using Linux, so no go on Chrome.

    Share
  23. At http://www.thealexandrian.net we’re currently seeing 5.2% of our traffic coming from Chrome, compared to 53.6% for Firefox, 29.2% for Explorer, and 5.5% for Safari.

    Personally, I like Chrome’s incognito mode. I also like Chrome’s tab interface and the isolated nature of crashes has already proven useful. But I’m still using Firefox more frequently, largely because it’s still set as the default. And it’s still set as a default because Chrome’s feature set isn’t fully there yet.

    Share
  24. Usage of Chrome isn’t as high up on my blog as on others: ff 44.70%, ie 44.41%, chrome 3.57%

    At work (Windows) Chrome is my browser of choice, I’m longing for the OSX release so that I can use it at home. On the systems I use, the launch time is so much quicker than FF, which is key for me.

    Most of the developers in the company are also using Chrome on their systems with little interest in IE8.

    Share
  25. Being a web developer, I spend at least 10-12 hrs a day inside a browser window. And though this sounds like an infomercial, Chrome increased my productivity and definitely made my work more enjoyable and inspired me to do more. Not only do I think Chrome is a definite game changer, I predict its browser share will hit double digits, in the next 3 months.
    The strengths of Chrome as I perceive:
    1. Speed – blows IE and FF away.
    2. Simplicity – the lack of add-ons, as I see it, is actually a good thing – makes it leaner and faster)
    3. Separate process for each tab.
    4. Open source which means an active community(though not as big as FF at present).
    5. Extensive testing by Google against the entire web.

    I did hit a few snags initially with the official release of Chrome on my Windows 2003 64-bit, all of
    which have been solved by installing the Nightly build of Chromium(the open source brother of Chrome).

    The Chrome share on the website(99% US traffic) I build and maintain are at par with ones mentioned
    in the post:
    Total Visitors: 2,590,553 (Sep 5 – Oct 5 2008)
    IE7 + IE6: 41.3 + 22.6
    Firefox: 17.28
    Safari: 13.32
    Chrome: 3.07

    Share
  26. firefox 3.0.3 has lots of bugs,k do not download it yet….on the other hand…chrome speed had increased significantly and the bookmarks do not show now when the website is open which is good

    Share
  27. One word v8. It’s fast, u can really tell the speed difference if you’re browsing sites with lots of javascripts like those made by most modern CMS-es and AJAX sites.

    These ppl know what they’re doing, give them more time :)

    Share
  28. I look at it this way. I have a bike I get around with quickly (chrome), and a work truck (firefox). I do all my work on firefox, debugging and developing isn’t a game changer yet on chrome, but when I’m browsing I use googles chrome. Its fast and if all I’m doing is reading its perfect for getting on the internet fast, browsing fast. But the way it handles downloads has me always closing my browser before its finished. So if there is anything like that involved I’ll go with firefox. It’s nice to have a webkit browser on windows that isn’t safari too. ie/ff/chrome has a good amount of coverage if you are testing websites out. A lot of windows users wont install safari, and as such you end up missing that demographic when you are aiming for browser compatibility.

    ps. I also have a pinto (ie6) and a tempo (ie7) but they leak too much oil to take out all the time :)

    Share
  29. Shoots,it works for me,and I am very much a newbie in the whole internet- computer scene.It’s pretty handy and faster than firefox.Of course I really didn’t have to unlearn any thing . Aloha!

    Share
  30. If you don’t even use it why bother writing an article about it? Why not instead have someone who has used it constantly for 30 days write one? Seems to make a lot more sense.

    Chrome is far from perfect when it comes to initial setup (importing/managing bookmarks is a pain), but once it’s up and running it’s quite painless overall, and will only surely get better. It took firefox a long time to build up to the numbers it now enjoys, and with the support of Google, is it truly likely that Google won’t give their own browser as much support in the long term?

    Share
  31. I’m hoping the come up with a really easy plug-in architecture for it, I would love it if Chrome was like a “base” browser, really fast with no bells and whistles, and then you have the ability to customize it to your liking via plug-ins. Firefox originally seemed like this, but I think over time it’s grown considerably.

    Share
  32. I was annoyed that Chrome isn’t officially available for Linux yet, so instead I installed Flock. It’s a little slower than Firefox, but within 24 hours I was hooked on all the features. Flock, my friends, is what a web browser should be. Not dinky little Chrome.

    Share
  33. im on a mac. i wish i could use chrome, just for the fact that every tab is a new process.

    from what i see the design/layout/typography of the program is nice.

    supposedly faster than firefox.

    the only thing I wouldn’t use it for is developing, I gotta have my Firebug.

    still waiting on the mac version,
    taelor

    Share
  34. particlesofspirit Sunday, October 5, 2008

    Sekhar – that’s my issue with Firefox as well. I’ve been using Chrome since day one, because of the Firefox crashes. The crashes were getting to the point of ridiculous. I still, however, have to use Firefox occasionally, because I sometimes run across something that doesn’t support Chrome.

    Share
  35. particlesofspirit Sunday, October 5, 2008

    Oh yeah, I forgot to mention. I hate the new History “library” on Firefox. It made it more difficult for me to find what I was looking for. Chrome history is ordered by most recent and they even conveniently time stamp it for me. :)

    Share
  36. Chrome is my default browser now. While Firefox is for long internet sessions, and can’t live without some extensions, Chrome start in less then a second and do what browsers sould do, show html pages, simple and fast.
    In a world of intelligent people it would take over IE users in few days.

    Share
  37. I really liked Chrome but can’t use it due to no Google Toolbar plugin, which I absolutely depend upon, e.g. mainly for the Google Bookmarks button (I use lots of different machines). Sadly, converts to Chrome seem to be predominently from Firefox. People who aren’t willing to try Firefox over IE aren’t likely to try Chrome, whereas a Firefox user would delight in a least evaluating Chrome.

    Share
  38. [...] have a larger audience and will be getting views from a larger demographic than this blog. GigaOm posted their readers usage of browsers yesterday and found that Chrome only had 5.5% of the browser share. The other major browsers had an [...]

    Share
  39. I tried Chrome for a day then went back to FireFox.

    Jiff
    http://www.privacy-center.ru.tc

    Share
  40. [...] October 5, 2008 Google’s Chrome browser launched a month ago: Svetlana (Profy) posted on the one-month anniversary, and Om followed up. [...]

    Share
  41. I am totally impartial to the fruitless Microsoft/Apple/Mozilla etc debates. I choose something simply because it works best for me. Chrome works best by far…..it is super fast, has no bugs, does not crash ever (unlike Firefox which crashes more often with every new release) and has a user interface which is streets ahead of its competition. That’ll do me.

    Share
  42. Still haven’t got round to try it out…..seems like there are very mixed opinions, suppose I’ll have to give it go….

    Share
  43. I tried Chrome for a day then went back to Mozilla.

    Share
  44. [...] Posted by яάη∂α on October 5, 2008 Google Chrome: One Month Later – G [...]

    Share
  45. I can’t resist to promote our article: What Chrome really means: http://blog.nektra.com/main/2008/09/08/google-chrome/

    Share
  46. I have not stopped using it since day 1.

    After 1 month of using “chrome” for pretty much all my browsing, I can say that

    1. It has never ever crashed.
    2. Acrobat Reader never loads inside chrome.
    3. Java and Flash work like a charm.
    4. Chrome’s Javascript engine has a few quirks(bugs), but nothing serious.

    Although I do sometimes, use Firefox just for my on line bank accounts.

    Share
  47. Om,

    One thing tech blogs need to keep in mind about Chrome and the amount of traffic that comes from Chrome users is your audience are techies and more likely/prone to try Chrome than mainstream Web users. As a result, Chrome usage on tech blogs will be significantly higher than non-tech blogs.

    Mark

    Share
  48. I can’t wait for the MAC version. I run it on XP at work and I absolutely love it. Very sparse but useful.

    Share
  49. There is no point in testing all these junks. Its still in very much beta with lots and lots of security bugs. In addition to that google is trying all the possible ways to collect as much personal information in the name of these ridiculous applications.

    There isn’t anything in it to be fascinated as i read in many other articles.In my personal point of view, google is not doing any social work. They have some hidden agendas. This is one among them.

    I’m satisfied with what firefox offers me now.

    Share
  50. I’m actually using Windows XP because of Chrome. As soon as Chrome is available for Ubuntu Linux, I will switch back to Ubuntu Linux.

    When Google will be launching more AJAX services that can take advantage of Chrome’s faster AJAX processing, if the other browsers haven’t been improved, Google will simple put a link on their homepage again.

    If needed, in a matter of a couple of months, by advertising for it on the worlds most popular website google.com, Google could make sure everyone has installed Chrome and uses it by default.

    Share
  51. Om,

    30Boxes calendar site currently has 1.70% chrome browsers for the last 30 days and for the last single day only 1.54%.

    Share
  52. [...] Malik wrote an interesting post about Google Chrome one month after the public launch. While I was reading Om’s post, I realized that I wrote a post for the Google Chrome release [...]

    Share
  53. I am using it since its launch and I am delighted with the simple, clean, minimalistic user interface. Some people complain about lack of support for toolbars or not having a proper bookmarks organizer, but I love the Google concept of “forget about organizing folders and simply search” for the page you bookmarked, or visited before. Same as in Gmail. Why waste time organizing emails into folders, if you have a powerful search feature.

    The single box for search and URL with autocomplete is also an improvement once you get used to it. It felt strange at the beginning to search for words on what used to be the URL box. But now I have teh opposite effect I missed the one box when I use Firefox or IE.

    Clean user interface, never crashes and extremely fast. Great job Google!

    Share
  54. [...] Malik wrote an interesting post about Google Chrome one month after the public launch. While I was reading Om’s post, I realized that I wrote a post for the Google Chrome release [...]

    Share
  55. [...] Chrome usage one month on By tim Om Malik asks about Chrome usage, one month after its [...]

    Share
  56. [...] speed, I think Chrome really holds up well. Om’s comments are filled with people who got hooked on the speedy and nice Google Chrome browser experience. A couple people [...]

    Share
  57. I think firefox much faster. I like DownThemAll plugins which Chrome doesn’t have.

    Try biofir.

    Share
  58. On Vitamin (http://www.thinkvitamin.com, a site aimed at web designers and developers so you’d probably expect our audience to be early adopters of new browsers) Chrome usage is currently at about 4%. It’s dropped back a bit, but that’s still a higher share than Opera (2.7%).

    Share
  59. A few days ago, I did my own ‘Chrome after a month’ review; just some practical observations. Here it is: http://quux.tumblr.com/post/52827143/googles-chrome-observations

    Share
  60. We started to use Chrome for our Free Digital Signage at MediaSignage http://www.MediaSignage.com and seems to work great !!!

    Share
  61. After a month of using, I love Chrome! It’s become my default browser on Vista and XP (across four PCs). I’m still looking forward to trying it on my MacBook and my Linux-based netbook, but if it’s anything like the Windows version, I’ll probably switch there as well.

    Chrome is fast, efficient, and stays out of my way.

    Share
  62. did anyone notice how the google search box started featuring on the home page now?

    even when my default search is yahoo?

    hmmmmmmmm

    Share
  63. I am still using Chrome but just as third choice browser … for me firefox is the king . There is no comparison to amount of customizations it can do.

    Share
  64. I love Chrome, but there is no way I will switch from Opera to Chrome … ever

    Share
  65. [...] Om Malik wrote an interesting post about Google Chrome one month after the public launch. While I was reading Om’s post, I realized that I wrote a post for the Google Chrome release [...]

    Share
  66. I’m still using Chrome as my primary browser. It’s fast and lean. I too noticed Chrome wasn’t on Google’s homepage after two weeks into release. It’s a wonderful product, I just hope they don’t pull the plug and resources away from this project.

    Share
  67. [...] who writes for us on a regular basis, in a recent email to me pointed out that one of the reasons why Google launched a browser (in addition to a toolbar) is because “…the Achilles heel of search engines is their [...]

    Share
  68. [...] Malik wrote an interesting post about Google Chrome one month after the public launch. While I was reading Om’s post, I realized that I wrote a post for the Google Chrome release [...]

    Share
  69. [...] Five Months With Google Chrome Om Malik wrote an interesting post about Google Chrome one month after the public launch. While I was reading Om’s post, I realized that I wrote a post for the Google Chrome release that [...]

    Share
  70. [...] After enjoying browsing internet with Google Chrome browser and find a google chrome theme look likes chrome still in developing such as plugin, add-ons,applications until they (refers to plugin,add-ons,applications) are released in fixed version. you can see another blog posting about five reasons to use google chrome and google chrome one month later  [...]

    Share
  71. [...] yap My Five Months With Google Chrome Om Malik wrote an interesting post about Google Chrome one month after the public launch. While I was reading Om’s post, I realized that I wrote a post for the Google Chrome release [...]

    Share
  72. Google is not after Microsoft’s share of the browser market: it’s after something much bigger.

    To understand what’s truly and enduringly interesting about Google Chrome, one needs to understand what is special about V8, its new Javascript engine. And to understand that, it’s useful to go back ten years to look at the position of Javascript’s remote cousin Java.

    Ten years ago, Java was so slow it was inconceivable that anybody could use it to build serious systems; its garbage collection process brought entire applications to a shuddering halt. Then a small start-up team led by Lars Bak, a graduate of Denmark’s famous Aarhus University, developed a new virtual machine for Java that enabled code to be compiled on the fly, improving Java’s performance 20 times or more. The start-up was rapidly acquired by Sun and Bak became the technology lead for Java Hotspot, Java’s current virtual machine.

    Hotspot changed everything: suddenly Java became a language to take very seriously indeed.

    Fast-forward ten years, and Lars Bak is back in Aarhus, leading the team developing V8, the Javascript engine behind Google Chrome.

    Without V8, Javascript suffers from the same problem Java had ten years ago: it’s painfully, unbelievably slow, tens or even hundreds of thousands of times slower than other languages. So despite its flexibility, it’s never been used for any kind of serious development; in fact, it’s been the single biggest hurdle to the development of more interesting applications that can run inside a browser.

    It’s not always Telkom’s fault when web pages load at a snail’s pace: Javascript is a big part of the problem. There have been a few attempts to replace it as the main tool for getting functionality into the browser, notably Microsoft’s Silverlight and Adobe’s Flex, both of which are being pushed hard. The goal for everyone is enable as much as possible to be done inside the browser, as efficiently as possible.

    Applications like Gmail and Google Maps have done amazingly well so far, but they are way out at the limits of what can be done inside a browser.

    Or rather, they WERE out at the limits of what could be done. Just as Hotspot changed everything for Java, so V8 is going to change everything for Javascript. In a below-the-radar blog post at the beginning of September announcing V8, Bak said it “has been designed for performance from the ground up. In particular, we wanted to remove some common bottlenecks that limit the amount and complexity of JavaScript code that can be used in Web applications.”

    Bak says there are three cornerstones of the V8 design: Compilation of JavaScript source code directly into native machine code, an efficient memory management system resulting in fast object allocation and small garbage collection pauses, and the Introduction of hidden classes and inline caches that speed up property access and function calls.

    That may not make a great deal of sense to those who aren’t programmers, but here’s the key point: V8 is fast. Very, very fast. So fast that it is now possible, for the first time, to develop seriously functionality inside a web browser without relying on obese plugins.

    Security is also much tighter with V8. Every tab opened in the browser is a separate process that is well sandboxed, allowing no leakage of malignant code. In other existing browsers, even Firefox, all tabs use a single execution thread and a single process, making the whole vulnerable to security problems. V8 provides a far superior environment for developing applications.

    Tellingly, V8 is open source, which will only magnify the huge ripple effect it is going to have. Slow runtime environments have been the biggest stumbling block to moving more functionality off the desktop and into the browser; with that removed, things are really going to take off. Google Docs, for one, will gather enormous strength, possibly making it a real alternative to Microsoft Office for the first time.

    Which brings us back to the starting point: Google is not interested in winning browser market share, it’s interested in replacing entire operating systems. A JavaScript engine that enables serious functionality to be offered inside the browser is a huge step in that direction.

    Share
  73. [...] Malik wrote an interesting post about Google Chrome one month after the public launch. While I was reading Om’s post, I realized that I wrote a post for the Google Chrome release [...]

    Share
  74. Well I really love google chrome using it from the day I installed, its rocking fast and it has not crashed till now. Just waiting for official google toolbar for chrome

    Share
  75. [...] running Chrome.) Although there are signs that the very early popularity of this browser has calmed down somewhat, it’s still generating a lot of buzz, Google has confirmed that many extensions are coming [...]

    Share
  76. I’ve using Chrome since it got out, and I haven’t used IE since.

    Most of all features, I love the performance and the reduced GUI.

    I’m sure it will eventually take the place of the other major browsers.

    Share
  77. [...] running Chrome.) Although there are signs that the very early popularity of this browser has calmed down somewhat, it’s still generating a lot of buzz, Google has confirmed that many extensions are coming [...]

    Share
  78. I hesitate to use even upgraded versions of Chrome, since my last experience using it (first version) left my computer compromised; have they fixed the security issues beyond all doubt?

    Share
  79. [...] a plateau, a fact that’s reflected in its share of traffic on this blog. As you might remember, I wrote about the first one month of Chrome, noting that it had about 5.6 percent of the total traffic to GigaOM, and between 2.24 percent and [...]

    Share
  80. [...] users have had a full month to enjoy Chrome now while those using OS X and Linux, have largely been left out in the cold. Despite the best [...]

    Share
  81. Google Chrome is the considered as the best browser. Nice one! Google products always rocks and it has made by developing work easy and productive.

    Regards,

    Chintan

    Share
  82. Chrome – the fastest and secured. Dont know why but its loads the sites too fast and really far better than mozilla.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post