<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WiMAX Deployment Needs Pico-Sized Help</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/10/02/wimax-deployment-needs-pico-sized-help/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/02/wimax-deployment-needs-pico-sized-help/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:56:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sprint&#8217;s Xohm Network is Only Half Open - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/02/wimax-deployment-needs-pico-sized-help/#comment-903561</link>
		<dc:creator>Sprint&#8217;s Xohm Network is Only Half Open - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=23364#comment-903561</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] testing isn&#8217;t going to help grow the number of gadgets and consumer awareness rapidly. As an executive over at Motorola told me, WiMAX is likely to win out when it&#8217;s seamless and easy for consumers to access and carriers [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] testing isn&#8217;t going to help grow the number of gadgets and consumer awareness rapidly. As an executive over at Motorola told me, WiMAX is likely to win out when it&#8217;s seamless and easy for consumers to access and carriers [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Femtocell market update for week of 29 September 2008 &#171; 3G In The Home</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/02/wimax-deployment-needs-pico-sized-help/#comment-903363</link>
		<dc:creator>Femtocell market update for week of 29 September 2008 &#171; 3G In The Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=23364#comment-903363</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Motorola sees WiMAX picocells, but says the jury&#8217;s out on femto.  Talking to GigaOM at WiMAX World, Motorola’s director of global strategy, Richard Keith, said he expects carrier-owned microcells and picocells to be part of WiMAX networks.  He was less sure about femtocells. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Motorola sees WiMAX picocells, but says the jury&#8217;s out on femto.  Talking to GigaOM at WiMAX World, Motorola’s director of global strategy, Richard Keith, said he expects carrier-owned microcells and picocells to be part of WiMAX networks.  He was less sure about femtocells. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurent</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/02/wimax-deployment-needs-pico-sized-help/#comment-902760</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=23364#comment-902760</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The main reason there is a potential Femtocell market is that Mobile Service Providers (MSPs) are not able to shoulder the huge investment required for nationwide coverage and proper capacity to cope with the current and foreseen demand. Femtocell is a consumer electronic device that require no installation (Plug and play). MSPs have a huge incentive in deploying Femtocell in order to reduce the investment required for the macro cells and therefore are likely to heavily subsidize those devices. With the right ecosystem in place, economy of scale will bring unit price to $100 and lower (As Femto design get embedded in other devices such as IP set-top-box) MSPs should significantly improve their bottom line as operating cost are going down (The consumer will pay for electricity and backhaul which are some of the major cost of running a mobile network).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now for WiMAX, I am a bit confused with this article as I doubt there is a market for WiMAX Femto since most WiMAX device (Laptops mainly) will have both WiMAX and WiFi radio. Besides it would make more sense to sell a WiMAX CPE that would integrate WiFi as well and relay the Macro signal inside the building via WiFi.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Might need to look closer into Motorola strategy but I am really skeptical.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main reason there is a potential Femtocell market is that Mobile Service Providers (MSPs) are not able to shoulder the huge investment required for nationwide coverage and proper capacity to cope with the current and foreseen demand. Femtocell is a consumer electronic device that require no installation (Plug and play). MSPs have a huge incentive in deploying Femtocell in order to reduce the investment required for the macro cells and therefore are likely to heavily subsidize those devices. With the right ecosystem in place, economy of scale will bring unit price to $100 and lower (As Femto design get embedded in other devices such as IP set-top-box) MSPs should significantly improve their bottom line as operating cost are going down (The consumer will pay for electricity and backhaul which are some of the major cost of running a mobile network).</p>

<p>Now for WiMAX, I am a bit confused with this article as I doubt there is a market for WiMAX Femto since most WiMAX device (Laptops mainly) will have both WiMAX and WiFi radio. Besides it would make more sense to sell a WiMAX CPE that would integrate WiFi as well and relay the Macro signal inside the building via WiFi.</p>

<p>Might need to look closer into Motorola strategy but I am really skeptical.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Murphy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/02/wimax-deployment-needs-pico-sized-help/#comment-902691</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=23364#comment-902691</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great article.  Motorola&#039;s velvet glove is looking a bit frayed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.  Motorola&#8217;s velvet glove is looking a bit frayed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/02/wimax-deployment-needs-pico-sized-help/#comment-902653</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=23364#comment-902653</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Wes&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Vendors and large customers want pay for coverage, but so far carriers generally refuse to support it. Carriers like control more than profits . . .&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Wes</p>

<p>Vendors and large customers want pay for coverage, but so far carriers generally refuse to support it. Carriers like control more than profits . . .</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Felter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/10/02/wimax-deployment-needs-pico-sized-help/#comment-902644</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Felter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=23364#comment-902644</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So now they&#039;re admitting the pay-for-coverage business model? At least they&#039;re honest.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now they&#8217;re admitting the pay-for-coverage business model? At least they&#8217;re honest.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
