<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GigaOM White Paper: The Facts &amp; Fiction of Bandwidth Caps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/gigaom-white-paper-the-facts-fiction-of-bandwidth-caps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/gigaom-white-paper-the-facts-fiction-of-bandwidth-caps/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:40:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roman Lenz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/gigaom-white-paper-the-facts-fiction-of-bandwidth-caps/#comment-148453</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roman Lenz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=22896#comment-148453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no need for the complex analysis offered in this &#039;white paper&#039;. As several posters have commented: Comcast has a conflict of interest as both an ISP and a content provider. As online video content delivery technology develops, Comcast has quite correctly seen the advancing threat posed to it&#039;s overpriced, over-commercialised cable delivered video entertainment monopoly and has taken preemptive measures to deny Internet users access to the increasing alternatives to it&#039;s own services offered by the proliferation of it&#039;s online competitors. Today it&#039;s a 250 Meg limit. A year from now 200. Two years from now 150 etc...

For one company to be both ISP and content provider presents a dangerous conflict of interest which will arrest the development of Internet technology and stifle free market competition amongst content providers. There are only two solutions: 1) More competition in the high-speed access market. 2) Tough regulation. Something which seems non-existent today, as the corporate world seems to do pretty much what it wants. Ask yourself:  if 99.9% of Comcast&#039;s High-speed customers are not using anywhere near the 250 meg cap, then why a need for a cap in the first place? If the less than 1% using 250 megs per month can download as much as they want up to the 250 limit without affecting the experience of other High-speed subscribers,  then why would the use of 260 or 300?

Comcast would have two options if I were running the FCC: 1) Update it&#039;s infrastructure to accommodate the Country&#039;s bandwidth needs. 2) Divest itself of either it&#039;s ISP or cable divisions. That the bandwidth cap was inspired by a desire to ensure a uniform customer experience as claimed in &#039;CON&#039;casts terms of service, is, quite frankly, rubbish and a big fat lie. Comcast is protecting it&#039;s own financial interests at the expense of it&#039;s customer base. I will not subscribe to any of Comcast&#039;s services as long as this bandwidth cap is in place as a matter of principle. For your general edification, I am a web designer rather than a p2p junkie. I am also a proactive consumer amongst a Nation of sheep.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no need for the complex analysis offered in this &#8216;white paper&#8217;. As several posters have commented: Comcast has a conflict of interest as both an ISP and a content provider. As online video content delivery technology develops, Comcast has quite correctly seen the advancing threat posed to it&#8217;s overpriced, over-commercialised cable delivered video entertainment monopoly and has taken preemptive measures to deny Internet users access to the increasing alternatives to it&#8217;s own services offered by the proliferation of it&#8217;s online competitors. Today it&#8217;s a 250 Meg limit. A year from now 200. Two years from now 150 etc&#8230;</p>
<p>For one company to be both ISP and content provider presents a dangerous conflict of interest which will arrest the development of Internet technology and stifle free market competition amongst content providers. There are only two solutions: 1) More competition in the high-speed access market. 2) Tough regulation. Something which seems non-existent today, as the corporate world seems to do pretty much what it wants. Ask yourself:  if 99.9% of Comcast&#8217;s High-speed customers are not using anywhere near the 250 meg cap, then why a need for a cap in the first place? If the less than 1% using 250 megs per month can download as much as they want up to the 250 limit without affecting the experience of other High-speed subscribers,  then why would the use of 260 or 300?</p>
<p>Comcast would have two options if I were running the FCC: 1) Update it&#8217;s infrastructure to accommodate the Country&#8217;s bandwidth needs. 2) Divest itself of either it&#8217;s ISP or cable divisions. That the bandwidth cap was inspired by a desire to ensure a uniform customer experience as claimed in &#8216;CON&#8217;casts terms of service, is, quite frankly, rubbish and a big fat lie. Comcast is protecting it&#8217;s own financial interests at the expense of it&#8217;s customer base. I will not subscribe to any of Comcast&#8217;s services as long as this bandwidth cap is in place as a matter of principle. For your general edification, I am a web designer rather than a p2p junkie. I am also a proactive consumer amongst a Nation of sheep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How ISPs Can Survive Becoming Dumb Pipes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/gigaom-white-paper-the-facts-fiction-of-bandwidth-caps/#comment-148452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How ISPs Can Survive Becoming Dumb Pipes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 16:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=22896#comment-148452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Time Warner Cable, AT&amp;T, PlusNet in the UK and most other UK broadband providers are  experimenting or have implemented caps or consumption-based plans as a way to boost their revenue from providing the pipe. The pipe is still dumb, but different pricing plans mean that carriers can make more money off of them. Benefits of this to the ISP are higher revenues (and presumably profits). The downside is that in a competitive market, carriers will get stuck with the low-end user as a customer base, and as those consumers die off or discover high-end services, they&#8217;re going to dump the pipe. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Time Warner Cable, AT&amp;T, PlusNet in the UK and most other UK broadband providers are  experimenting or have implemented caps or consumption-based plans as a way to boost their revenue from providing the pipe. The pipe is still dumb, but different pricing plans mean that carriers can make more money off of them. Benefits of this to the ISP are higher revenues (and presumably profits). The downside is that in a competitive market, carriers will get stuck with the low-end user as a customer base, and as those consumers die off or discover high-end services, they&#8217;re going to dump the pipe. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is There Such a Thing As a Better Broadband Cap?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/gigaom-white-paper-the-facts-fiction-of-bandwidth-caps/#comment-148451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is There Such a Thing As a Better Broadband Cap?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 20:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=22896#comment-148451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] resource. For most providers, it&#8217;s not. ISPs want to price broadband like a precious metal, but few seem willing to accept their arguments. Readers, what do you think? Is there such thing as a good broadband cap?    [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] resource. For most providers, it&#8217;s not. ISPs want to price broadband like a precious metal, but few seem willing to accept their arguments. Readers, what do you think? Is there such thing as a good broadband cap?    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Vanderhurst</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/gigaom-white-paper-the-facts-fiction-of-bandwidth-caps/#comment-148450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Vanderhurst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=22896#comment-148450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just as we are beginning to see the web develop into a place where rich media is not only possible but maturing at a rapid pace, the level of service we are paying for just isn’t meeting the demand. They are actually limiting our growth with in the technmology.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as we are beginning to see the web develop into a place where rich media is not only possible but maturing at a rapid pace, the level of service we are paying for just isn’t meeting the demand. They are actually limiting our growth with in the technmology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eyeontic &#187; Cuando las barbas de tu vecino veas cortar&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/gigaom-white-paper-the-facts-fiction-of-bandwidth-caps/#comment-148449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eyeontic &#187; Cuando las barbas de tu vecino veas cortar&#8230;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=22896#comment-148449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] GigaOM. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GigaOM. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can You Be a Good Parent and a Good Blogger? - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/gigaom-white-paper-the-facts-fiction-of-bandwidth-caps/#comment-148448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Can You Be a Good Parent and a Good Blogger? - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=22896#comment-148448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] some time to think about a few topics that really interest me, such as privacy, home networking, broadband pricing and regulation, and where the chip industry might be in the next five years. Feel free to send your [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some time to think about a few topics that really interest me, such as privacy, home networking, broadband pricing and regulation, and where the chip industry might be in the next five years. Feel free to send your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hate Comcast, Get Faster DSL in San Francisco - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/gigaom-white-paper-the-facts-fiction-of-bandwidth-caps/#comment-148447</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hate Comcast, Get Faster DSL in San Francisco - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=22896#comment-148447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Malik  &#124; Tuesday, November 25, 2008 &#124; 3:43 PM PT &#124; 0 comments    As you all very well know, I have little patience for Comcast and its anti-innovation policy of metered broadband. If you are like me and are looking [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malik  | Tuesday, November 25, 2008 | 3:43 PM PT | 0 comments    As you all very well know, I have little patience for Comcast and its anti-innovation policy of metered broadband. If you are like me and are looking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Globally, Now 400M Broadband Subscribers - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/gigaom-white-paper-the-facts-fiction-of-bandwidth-caps/#comment-148446</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Globally, Now 400M Broadband Subscribers - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=22896#comment-148446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of Skype, YouTube, and countless other such innovations. But it&#8217;s all coming under threat, thanks to the backward-looking policies of companies like Time Warner Cable, Comcast and AT&amp;T, all of which want to put a meter on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Skype, YouTube, and countless other such innovations. But it&#8217;s all coming under threat, thanks to the backward-looking policies of companies like Time Warner Cable, Comcast and AT&amp;T, all of which want to put a meter on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comcast Listen To Mark Cuban, 250GB Download Caps Coming Wednesday : tinyComb</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/gigaom-white-paper-the-facts-fiction-of-bandwidth-caps/#comment-148445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Comcast Listen To Mark Cuban, 250GB Download Caps Coming Wednesday : tinyComb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=22896#comment-148445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Om   September 30, 2008 &#124; jason &#124; Tech Leaders, comcast&#160; &#124; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Om   September 30, 2008 | jason | Tech Leaders, comcast&nbsp; | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Today at NewTeeVee Live, We Debate the Future of Internet Video - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/gigaom-white-paper-the-facts-fiction-of-bandwidth-caps/#comment-148444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Today at NewTeeVee Live, We Debate the Future of Internet Video - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=22896#comment-148444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] video-watching habits, while extreme, are precisely what is scaring cable companies into taking the self-destructive and short-sighted approach of imposing metered broadband on their customers. Phone companies are following [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] video-watching habits, while extreme, are precisely what is scaring cable companies into taking the self-destructive and short-sighted approach of imposing metered broadband on their customers. Phone companies are following [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/gigaom-white-paper-the-facts-fiction-of-bandwidth-caps/#comment-148443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=22896#comment-148443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is not at all a good thing. I have decided to monitor the actual usage of the different aspect that Comcast covered. i.e. video uses more than they say, emails use more than they say. I have now disconnected everything in my house minus my pc until I can find a new provider. I am doing web design and marketing from my cell based carrier. And no, none of this is based on P2P it is extremely easy to cross the 250GB limit in this wonderfully wired and innovative society of free learning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not at all a good thing. I have decided to monitor the actual usage of the different aspect that Comcast covered. i.e. video uses more than they say, emails use more than they say. I have now disconnected everything in my house minus my pc until I can find a new provider. I am doing web design and marketing from my cell based carrier. And no, none of this is based on P2P it is extremely easy to cross the 250GB limit in this wonderfully wired and innovative society of free learning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PodTube &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Only 250GB per MONTH?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/gigaom-white-paper-the-facts-fiction-of-bandwidth-caps/#comment-148442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PodTube &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Only 250GB per MONTH?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=22896#comment-148442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to GigaOM, this&#8217;ll somehow bring about an internet apocalypse! Somehow. Read their article here. They think 250 gigabytes - or 250,000,000 kilobytes - is not enough. THAT makes SO MUCH SENSE, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to GigaOM, this&#8217;ll somehow bring about an internet apocalypse! Somehow. Read their article here. They think 250 gigabytes &#8211; or 250,000,000 kilobytes &#8211; is not enough. THAT makes SO MUCH SENSE, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: String Theory &#187; Scott Hull Associates:…Art Works among Creators, Clients, and Fans</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/gigaom-white-paper-the-facts-fiction-of-bandwidth-caps/#comment-148441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[String Theory &#187; Scott Hull Associates:…Art Works among Creators, Clients, and Fans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=22896#comment-148441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 1, 2008Today Comcast, America’s largest broadband ISP, will begin capping customers’ home internet usage at 2.... This is in addition (subtraction?) to already blocking your access to the services they decide [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1, 2008Today Comcast, America’s largest broadband ISP, will begin capping customers’ home internet usage at 2&#8230;. This is in addition (subtraction?) to already blocking your access to the services they decide [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fenix</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/gigaom-white-paper-the-facts-fiction-of-bandwidth-caps/#comment-148440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fenix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=22896#comment-148440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the many groups I know of who are not &quot;pirates&quot; (a favorite accusation tossed at anyone who isn&#039;t interested in corporate tryanny, it seems) are gamers. Bandwidth use can easily exceed Comcast&#039;s cap between the game, the addons, and the voip server players use to coordinate with one another.

Most gamers already pay for fast downstream to support patches and response times when playing. To have to pay for load cap as well would destroy the online gaming market.

Personally? All this paper did was insure I stop using Comcast and tell every gamer I know to do the same. Considering World of Warcraft has damn near ten million (perhaps more by now) subscribers and 80% of them are in the USA, I&#039;m thinking Comcast may be in for a bit of a surprise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the many groups I know of who are not &#8220;pirates&#8221; (a favorite accusation tossed at anyone who isn&#8217;t interested in corporate tryanny, it seems) are gamers. Bandwidth use can easily exceed Comcast&#8217;s cap between the game, the addons, and the voip server players use to coordinate with one another.</p>
<p>Most gamers already pay for fast downstream to support patches and response times when playing. To have to pay for load cap as well would destroy the online gaming market.</p>
<p>Personally? All this paper did was insure I stop using Comcast and tell every gamer I know to do the same. Considering World of Warcraft has damn near ten million (perhaps more by now) subscribers and 80% of them are in the USA, I&#8217;m thinking Comcast may be in for a bit of a surprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/gigaom-white-paper-the-facts-fiction-of-bandwidth-caps/#comment-148439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=22896#comment-148439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, the caps are impeding what innovation? People say “movies, music, HD, streaming.”

downloading movies and music does NOT necessarily mean illegally

&quot;This has nothing to do with anything. Most people waste their time watching all these movies and playing games and none of it correlates to innovation.&quot;

I&#039;m sorry, but not everyone is a workaholic like you are. with the economy the way it is, it gives even more reason to go home at night, sit down, and relax to a good movie. what is wrong with that?? just because someone uses a lot of bandwidth does not mean they need to be running a business, or are wasting time. a lot of people don&#039;t have the extra money to have business class internet access, especially right now.

&quot;I am all about innovation, but innovation is created by smart people and/or people with great ideas. These people are usually in college, a business, or have at least a few bucks more to afford a no-cap service.&quot;

I am a smart guy, with good ideas. I am working on putting my ideas to good use and making a profit from it, but I am not doing it for another business, and I didn&#039;t go to college for years, I am completely self-taught. my hobby uses a lot of bandwidth. I offer free documents to tv repair shops. I already pay for a dedicated server in a datacenter each month, and can barely afford that and residential internet access. I can&#039;t afford an upgrade. not that it&#039;s all about me, I&#039;m using myself as an example.

&quot;If Business Class is capped, then I would totally agree with you. But if you are looking for innovation, go to a school. They all still get their bandwidth for free.&quot;

college IS over-rated. I know a bunch of people who have gone to school for computers for 2 or more years. the whole time they were in school, they still came to me for help, and they still never come close to my skills. I can rip a junk stereo apart, rebuild it from the ground up, and have one better then new. I can wire a house completely from the pole to the last outlet, and pass inspection, and I can change an engine or transmission in a car by myself. my point is, I didn&#039;t have to go to school to learn what I know, I learned it all on my own, and all before I was 20. not some know it all kid either, because I have done it all successfully in the past.

you were pretty rude and ignorant in your post. keep your selfish opinions to yourself. if you have a good point to make, and have done your research, then post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, the caps are impeding what innovation? People say “movies, music, HD, streaming.”</p>
<p>downloading movies and music does NOT necessarily mean illegally</p>
<p>&#8220;This has nothing to do with anything. Most people waste their time watching all these movies and playing games and none of it correlates to innovation.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but not everyone is a workaholic like you are. with the economy the way it is, it gives even more reason to go home at night, sit down, and relax to a good movie. what is wrong with that?? just because someone uses a lot of bandwidth does not mean they need to be running a business, or are wasting time. a lot of people don&#8217;t have the extra money to have business class internet access, especially right now.</p>
<p>&#8220;I am all about innovation, but innovation is created by smart people and/or people with great ideas. These people are usually in college, a business, or have at least a few bucks more to afford a no-cap service.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am a smart guy, with good ideas. I am working on putting my ideas to good use and making a profit from it, but I am not doing it for another business, and I didn&#8217;t go to college for years, I am completely self-taught. my hobby uses a lot of bandwidth. I offer free documents to tv repair shops. I already pay for a dedicated server in a datacenter each month, and can barely afford that and residential internet access. I can&#8217;t afford an upgrade. not that it&#8217;s all about me, I&#8217;m using myself as an example.</p>
<p>&#8220;If Business Class is capped, then I would totally agree with you. But if you are looking for innovation, go to a school. They all still get their bandwidth for free.&#8221;</p>
<p>college IS over-rated. I know a bunch of people who have gone to school for computers for 2 or more years. the whole time they were in school, they still came to me for help, and they still never come close to my skills. I can rip a junk stereo apart, rebuild it from the ground up, and have one better then new. I can wire a house completely from the pole to the last outlet, and pass inspection, and I can change an engine or transmission in a car by myself. my point is, I didn&#8217;t have to go to school to learn what I know, I learned it all on my own, and all before I was 20. not some know it all kid either, because I have done it all successfully in the past.</p>
<p>you were pretty rude and ignorant in your post. keep your selfish opinions to yourself. if you have a good point to make, and have done your research, then post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redsoxmaniac</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/30/gigaom-white-paper-the-facts-fiction-of-bandwidth-caps/#comment-148438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[redsoxmaniac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=22896#comment-148438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to be mean, but get Comcast Business. There is no cap, and its a little more.

Also, the caps are impeding what innovation? People say &quot;movies, music, HD, streaming.&quot;

This has nothing to do with anything. Most people waste their time watching all these movies and playing games and none of it correlates to innovation.

Stop whining, and use the internet for work. If you are, get Comcast Business class. If you are downloading HD movies, stop it, because the economy is crashing, and you have no time to be watching Forgetting Sarah Marshall.

I am all about innovation, but innovation is created by smart people and/or people with great ideas. These people are usually in college, a business, or have at least a few bucks more to afford a no-cap service.

If Business Class is capped, then I would totally agree with you. But if you are looking for innovation, go to a school. They all still get their bandwidth for free.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to be mean, but get Comcast Business. There is no cap, and its a little more.</p>
<p>Also, the caps are impeding what innovation? People say &#8220;movies, music, HD, streaming.&#8221;</p>
<p>This has nothing to do with anything. Most people waste their time watching all these movies and playing games and none of it correlates to innovation.</p>
<p>Stop whining, and use the internet for work. If you are, get Comcast Business class. If you are downloading HD movies, stop it, because the economy is crashing, and you have no time to be watching Forgetting Sarah Marshall.</p>
<p>I am all about innovation, but innovation is created by smart people and/or people with great ideas. These people are usually in college, a business, or have at least a few bucks more to afford a no-cap service.</p>
<p>If Business Class is capped, then I would totally agree with you. But if you are looking for innovation, go to a school. They all still get their bandwidth for free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

