<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coming Next Spring: A Cheaper Way to Watch HD Wirelessly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/09/25/coming-next-spring-a-cheaper-way-to-watch-wireless-hd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/25/coming-next-spring-a-cheaper-way-to-watch-wireless-hd/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:17:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/25/coming-next-spring-a-cheaper-way-to-watch-wireless-hd/#comment-943349</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 04:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=21879#comment-943349</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well it&#039;s past spring and there is nothing &quot;mainstream&quot; with wireless HD video transfer. Definitely seems like its going to happen soon. After all, HDMI only has to be able to transmit 1s and 0s. Wonder what companies such as http://cabletrain.com are going to do when this hits the market?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it&#8217;s past spring and there is nothing &#8220;mainstream&#8221; with wireless HD video transfer. Definitely seems like its going to happen soon. After all, HDMI only has to be able to transmit 1s and 0s. Wonder what companies such as <a href="http://cabletrain.com" rel="nofollow">http://cabletrain.com</a> are going to do when this hits the market?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WiGig Alliance to Push 6 Gbps Wireless in the Home</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/25/coming-next-spring-a-cheaper-way-to-watch-wireless-hd/#comment-942465</link>
		<dc:creator>WiGig Alliance to Push 6 Gbps Wireless in the Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=21879#comment-942465</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] connection to transmit the signals. The WiGig Alliance (and other companies promoting 60 GHz radios) gets around this line-of-sight limitation by bouncing the signal off walls, and even people, [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] connection to transmit the signals. The WiGig Alliance (and other companies promoting 60 GHz radios) gets around this line-of-sight limitation by bouncing the signal off walls, and even people, [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 802.11n To Win The Wireless HD Video Sweepstakes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/25/coming-next-spring-a-cheaper-way-to-watch-wireless-hd/#comment-941120</link>
		<dc:creator>802.11n To Win The Wireless HD Video Sweepstakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=21879#comment-941120</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...]    Given that the wireless networking technology Ultrawideband (UWB) is on its deathbed and WirelessHD and WHDI are yet to gain any real momentum, it seems that the winner of wireless HD video sweepstakes is [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]    Given that the wireless networking technology Ultrawideband (UWB) is on its deathbed and WirelessHD and WHDI are yet to gain any real momentum, it seems that the winner of wireless HD video sweepstakes is [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gefen Cuts the HDMI Cord</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/25/coming-next-spring-a-cheaper-way-to-watch-wireless-hd/#comment-934955</link>
		<dc:creator>Gefen Cuts the HDMI Cord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=21879#comment-934955</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] in the works. Some of these products are expected to use the WirelessHD standard, which should allow for cheaper products. We can only hope that once Gefen has some significant competition, the price will drop &#8212; [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the works. Some of these products are expected to use the WirelessHD standard, which should allow for cheaper products. We can only hope that once Gefen has some significant competition, the price will drop &#8212; [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wireless Broadband Races to 12.5 GBps With Microwaves</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/25/coming-next-spring-a-cheaper-way-to-watch-wireless-hd/#comment-930750</link>
		<dc:creator>Wireless Broadband Races to 12.5 GBps With Microwaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=21879#comment-930750</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] as it sounds. Readers of this blog are familiar with a variation on this technology, known as 60 GHz, which underlies the WirelessHD high-definition video transfer standard. It&#8217;s also a technology being discussed by the IEEE for high throughput Wi-Fi. The [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as it sounds. Readers of this blog are familiar with a variation on this technology, known as 60 GHz, which underlies the WirelessHD high-definition video transfer standard. It&#8217;s also a technology being discussed by the IEEE for high throughput Wi-Fi. The [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/25/coming-next-spring-a-cheaper-way-to-watch-wireless-hd/#comment-905606</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 02:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=21879#comment-905606</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sheesh,  Sibeam has been at this for better than 5 years now.  Still no retail products.  When we gonna see somethin&#039; other than blab?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheesh,  Sibeam has been at this for better than 5 years now.  Still no retail products.  When we gonna see somethin&#8217; other than blab?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KenC</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/25/coming-next-spring-a-cheaper-way-to-watch-wireless-hd/#comment-901859</link>
		<dc:creator>KenC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 02:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=21879#comment-901859</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds interesting, how does the signal compare to just slinging your HD signal around over wifi with the new Slingbox Pro-HD, that just came out?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds interesting, how does the signal compare to just slinging your HD signal around over wifi with the new Slingbox Pro-HD, that just came out?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Allen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/25/coming-next-spring-a-cheaper-way-to-watch-wireless-hd/#comment-901699</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=21879#comment-901699</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A lossless, uncompressed format has a couple of advantages:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No forward error correction is necessary, and that means no processing is necessary to try and correct detected errors. This means a less complex chip set with lower power requirements.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Lack of error correction also means no logic is necessary to arbitrate between the multi-pathed bit stream, i.e. which stream is &quot;correct&quot;.
With a low enough bit error rate any perceived error in the bit stream will be virtually invisible, anyway.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lossless, uncompressed format has a couple of advantages:</p>

<p>No forward error correction is necessary, and that means no processing is necessary to try and correct detected errors. This means a less complex chip set with lower power requirements.</p>

<p>Lack of error correction also means no logic is necessary to arbitrate between the multi-pathed bit stream, i.e. which stream is &#8220;correct&#8221;.
With a low enough bit error rate any perceived error in the bit stream will be virtually invisible, anyway.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
