<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qualcomm Marries Satellite and Cellular Networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/09/22/qualcomm-marries-satellite-and-cellular-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/22/qualcomm-marries-satellite-and-cellular-networks/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:36:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Ominous Return of the Satellite Phone</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/22/qualcomm-marries-satellite-and-cellular-networks/#comment-944812</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ominous Return of the Satellite Phone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=21962#comment-944812</guid>
		<description>[...] CTO, Dennis Matheson disagrees. He says the launch of chips from Qualcomm next year will enable handsets and data cards that can deliver LTE-speeds in the 2 GHz spectrum that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CTO, Dennis Matheson disagrees. He says the launch of chips from Qualcomm next year will enable handsets and data cards that can deliver LTE-speeds in the 2 GHz spectrum that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satellite Player Skyterra Ready to Try Again</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/22/qualcomm-marries-satellite-and-cellular-networks/#comment-919252</link>
		<dc:creator>Satellite Player Skyterra Ready to Try Again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 17:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=21962#comment-919252</guid>
		<description>[...] two game-changing years. The company will launch a new satellite in 2009, and in 2010, it will see Qualcomm integrate radios into its cellular chips that can communicate with Skyterra&#8217;s satelli.... Skyterra may also complete a merger with Inmarsat, if regulators sign off on it. This all means [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] two game-changing years. The company will launch a new satellite in 2009, and in 2010, it will see Qualcomm integrate radios into its cellular chips that can communicate with Skyterra&#8217;s satelli&#8230;. Skyterra may also complete a merger with Inmarsat, if regulators sign off on it. This all means [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why There Won&#8217;t Be Broadband Competition Anytime Soon - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/22/qualcomm-marries-satellite-and-cellular-networks/#comment-901683</link>
		<dc:creator>Why There Won&#8217;t Be Broadband Competition Anytime Soon - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=21962#comment-901683</guid>
		<description>[...] As we said in our recent story on efforts to create wireless broadband using the spectrum between digital TV channels, the devil is in the details. Through rulemaking or setting incredibly high reserves, the FCC can cripple any wireless broadband competition. That means a network could look like it might happen, but get bogged down or end up useless. Through constant delays the FCC can hamper the creation of an alternative network, as it&#8217;s doing in the case of M2Z, and did all the way back in 2003 when it waffled over approving the ATC rules that allow a satellite company to offer both terrestrial and satellite coverage. That was supposed to bring wireless broadband competition too. And it may&#8230;more than half a decade later. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As we said in our recent story on efforts to create wireless broadband using the spectrum between digital TV channels, the devil is in the details. Through rulemaking or setting incredibly high reserves, the FCC can cripple any wireless broadband competition. That means a network could look like it might happen, but get bogged down or end up useless. Through constant delays the FCC can hamper the creation of an alternative network, as it&#8217;s doing in the case of M2Z, and did all the way back in 2003 when it waffled over approving the ATC rules that allow a satellite company to offer both terrestrial and satellite coverage. That was supposed to bring wireless broadband competition too. And it may&#8230;more than half a decade later. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shah Ullah</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/22/qualcomm-marries-satellite-and-cellular-networks/#comment-900814</link>
		<dc:creator>Shah Ullah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=21962#comment-900814</guid>
		<description>Stacey,

The post above got me thinking a little bit, but I may be off:

Since Verizon and AT&amp;T are both rolling out fiber and have their own TV services, does it make sense for traditional DBS TV providers to work with Clearwire so that signals could be switched between a WiMax connection and a satellite connection (inside the home and for mobile devices) similar to what Qualcomm is encouraging between satellite and CDMA? I&#039;m not sure if traditional DBS TV providers could even switch off with any type of cellular network - I may be off, is it safe to assume your post and referencing articles are only suggesting hand-off between a cellular network and an IP-enabled satellite network? If so, what would it take for the traditional DBS TV providers to switch to an underlying IP-based satellite network such as TerreStar? 

Also, understand that Clearwire has already signed deals with some of the largest cable companies to white label a mobile service for them, but if the competitive hurdle was overcome, would it be possible for Clearwire to pair up with an IP-enabled satellite network? Then consumers could potentially have 3 well equipped, next generation quadruple play broadband packages: a WiMax+Satellite combination that offers quadruple play (maybe some sort of set-top box/router/godbox that accepts both IP-based satellite and WiMax signals and mobile phones that do the same), a WiMax+Cable solution (such as Clearwire and their cable companies or what Cox is doing independently with its recently purchased spectrum - again, with similar set-top box/router/godbox that takes cable+WiMax signals and mobile WiMax phones that could one day use cable infrastructure as backhaul), and a fiber+LTE solution from Verizon and ATT. 

Does any of that sound reasonable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacey,</p>
<p>The post above got me thinking a little bit, but I may be off:</p>
<p>Since Verizon and AT&amp;T are both rolling out fiber and have their own TV services, does it make sense for traditional DBS TV providers to work with Clearwire so that signals could be switched between a WiMax connection and a satellite connection (inside the home and for mobile devices) similar to what Qualcomm is encouraging between satellite and CDMA? I&#8217;m not sure if traditional DBS TV providers could even switch off with any type of cellular network &#8211; I may be off, is it safe to assume your post and referencing articles are only suggesting hand-off between a cellular network and an IP-enabled satellite network? If so, what would it take for the traditional DBS TV providers to switch to an underlying IP-based satellite network such as TerreStar? </p>
<p>Also, understand that Clearwire has already signed deals with some of the largest cable companies to white label a mobile service for them, but if the competitive hurdle was overcome, would it be possible for Clearwire to pair up with an IP-enabled satellite network? Then consumers could potentially have 3 well equipped, next generation quadruple play broadband packages: a WiMax+Satellite combination that offers quadruple play (maybe some sort of set-top box/router/godbox that accepts both IP-based satellite and WiMax signals and mobile phones that do the same), a WiMax+Cable solution (such as Clearwire and their cable companies or what Cox is doing independently with its recently purchased spectrum &#8211; again, with similar set-top box/router/godbox that takes cable+WiMax signals and mobile WiMax phones that could one day use cable infrastructure as backhaul), and a fiber+LTE solution from Verizon and ATT. </p>
<p>Does any of that sound reasonable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/22/qualcomm-marries-satellite-and-cellular-networks/#comment-900799</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=21962#comment-900799</guid>
		<description>Stacey, add mobile digital TV (DVB-SH), and you have what Dublin-based Solaris Mobile .com is working on for Europe, with Alcatel technology. Now that mobile digital broadcast TV (DVB-H) is essentially dead in Europe, mobile TV, radio and internet over satellite might be getting a chance in 2009. Would be interesting to read your story on their current status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacey, add mobile digital TV (DVB-SH), and you have what Dublin-based Solaris Mobile .com is working on for Europe, with Alcatel technology. Now that mobile digital broadcast TV (DVB-H) is essentially dead in Europe, mobile TV, radio and internet over satellite might be getting a chance in 2009. Would be interesting to read your story on their current status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
