<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Laws Should Govern Computing Clouds?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/09/10/what-laws-should-govern-computing-clouds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/10/what-laws-should-govern-computing-clouds/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Bodifee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/10/what-laws-should-govern-computing-clouds/#comment-899104</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bodifee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=20572#comment-899104</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The US could certainly take a closer look how privacy of data is governed by law in Europe. The principles of EU Directive 95/46/EC should also be applied to laws protecting data of organizations who trust a cloud service vendor to provide a reliable and economical service. And last but not least: copying data without the consent or authorization of the owner should become a criminal offense.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US could certainly take a closer look how privacy of data is governed by law in Europe. The principles of EU Directive 95/46/EC should also be applied to laws protecting data of organizations who trust a cloud service vendor to provide a reliable and economical service. And last but not least: copying data without the consent or authorization of the owner should become a criminal offense.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Urquhart</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/10/what-laws-should-govern-computing-clouds/#comment-898987</link>
		<dc:creator>James Urquhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=20572#comment-898987</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/09/cloud-computing-and-constitution.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;big constitutional level problem lurking&lt;/a&gt; about whether storing your data in the cloud means you give the data to the cloud provider (ala phone records), or continue to own the data but &quot;rent&quot; an extension of your own property to house it (ala an apartment or storage locker).  The core issue here is do you retain your rights with regards to search and seizure, or do you give your cloud vendor and the federal government complete rights to protect your data (or not) as they see fit.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I hope Google addresses this.  Otherwise, enterprises will find themselves driven to build private clouds, within their own four walls, where there are few questions about search and seizure rights, not to mention privacy rights in general.  Read &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/09/cloud-computing-and-constitution.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my post&lt;/a&gt; for more details.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a <a href="http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/09/cloud-computing-and-constitution.html" rel="nofollow">big constitutional level problem lurking</a> about whether storing your data in the cloud means you give the data to the cloud provider (ala phone records), or continue to own the data but &#8220;rent&#8221; an extension of your own property to house it (ala an apartment or storage locker).  The core issue here is do you retain your rights with regards to search and seizure, or do you give your cloud vendor and the federal government complete rights to protect your data (or not) as they see fit.</p>

<p>I hope Google addresses this.  Otherwise, enterprises will find themselves driven to build private clouds, within their own four walls, where there are few questions about search and seizure rights, not to mention privacy rights in general.  Read <a href="http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/09/cloud-computing-and-constitution.html" rel="nofollow">my post</a> for more details.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloud Feed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Cloud Feed - Sep 11, 2008</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/10/what-laws-should-govern-computing-clouds/#comment-898954</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloud Feed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Cloud Feed - Sep 11, 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=20572#comment-898954</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] What Laws Should Govern Computing Clouds? [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What Laws Should Govern Computing Clouds? [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google plant Flotte mit schwimmenden Rechenzentren &#171; c/o operative</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/10/what-laws-should-govern-computing-clouds/#comment-898878</link>
		<dc:creator>Google plant Flotte mit schwimmenden Rechenzentren &#171; c/o operative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=20572#comment-898878</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] via Gigaom, Photo by Gladius, CC [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Gigaom, Photo by Gladius, CC [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nandkishore Pippal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/10/what-laws-should-govern-computing-clouds/#comment-898845</link>
		<dc:creator>Nandkishore Pippal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=20572#comment-898845</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;owning a Ccloud is a better idea. Offcourse the thing is to be understood is the content privacies and security and i think G people are smart enough to plough in the CCloud arens. It should not be an issue of the cloud use.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>owning a Ccloud is a better idea. Offcourse the thing is to be understood is the content privacies and security and i think G people are smart enough to plough in the CCloud arens. It should not be an issue of the cloud use.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Kiesel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/10/what-laws-should-govern-computing-clouds/#comment-898837</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Kiesel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 04:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=20572#comment-898837</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I thought Google&#039;s mantra was &quot;Do no evil&quot;. Wanting ownership of everything viewed or uploaded via their browser sounds more menacing than the former Dr. Evil, Microsoft.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Jason Kiesel
Founder &amp; CEO
http://www.freedomspeaks.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Google&#8217;s mantra was &#8220;Do no evil&#8221;. Wanting ownership of everything viewed or uploaded via their browser sounds more menacing than the former Dr. Evil, Microsoft.</p>

<p>Jason Kiesel
Founder &amp; CEO
<a href="http://www.freedomspeaks.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.freedomspeaks.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/10/what-laws-should-govern-computing-clouds/#comment-898820</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=20572#comment-898820</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone can file a patent and with some luck get it too.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Quick file a patent on setting up a data center in Space for disaster recovery :-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think Google has lost some of its boyish charm. 10-year old company is already behaving like an hormone going astray - erratic teenager. 
- Names a browser on what till yesterday meant wheels on a Car - Chrome
- dreams of data center rigs (instead of oil rigs) - mining for data instead of oil
- Calls floating data center part of cloud.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Smoke on Water &#039;eh&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone can file a patent and with some luck get it too.</p>

<p>Quick file a patent on setting up a data center in Space for disaster recovery :-)</p>

<p>I think Google has lost some of its boyish charm. 10-year old company is already behaving like an hormone going astray &#8211; erratic teenager. 
- Names a browser on what till yesterday meant wheels on a Car &#8211; Chrome
- dreams of data center rigs (instead of oil rigs) &#8211; mining for data instead of oil
- Calls floating data center part of cloud.</p>

<p>Smoke on Water &#8216;eh</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
