12 Comments

Summary:

Dell has gone on record to say that they’re entering the netbook market this week, so it could happen any day now. I’m sure there won’t be many surprises in terms of the features and look, so again I wonder what will make this offering different […]

DelllogoDell has gone on record to say that they’re entering the netbook market this week, so it could happen any day now. I’m sure there won’t be many surprises in terms of the features and look, so again I wonder what will make this offering different from this market.

We’ve already identified a few aspects that cause people to pick one netbook over another: price is a definite factor as are the Linux implementations that some vendors customize and offers. Dell may be partnering with Box.net to offer online storage capabilities, but even that is something that’s been done; Asus has been talking about that for a few months. Makes me wonder if most of the Dell models (assuming there’s more than one) will offer wireless broadband: when you’re out and about, you’ll need a way to access that online storage, no? Or they could be hooking up with a carrier to subsidize and therefore reduce the up-front device cost.

Since we get so many questions about "build quality" when we look at these devices, I’m wondering if "brand name" is part of the equation here. Dell is joining HP and Lenovo as another "household name" vendor, at least here in the United States. Sure, Acer and Asus might be familiar to some consumers, but I think Dell and HP offer stronger brand recognition. Many people equate brand names with quality, which is why I’m tying the two together here, but perhaps I’m off-base.

Along with the brand name factor comes marketing. Why are names like Dell and HP so well known? Part of the reason is that most people have seen print or television ads from these companies. Plus, they walk into the local brick-and-mortar electronics chain and see far more Dell and HP computer models than they do from other brands. And those models are featured in the weekly circulars… even more brand reinforcement.

I hadn’t thought about branding on netbooks up to now, but with Dell entering the market, I’m thinking that it’s another way to differentiate a netbook that’s similar to so many others out there. Thoughts?

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. I think Dell will sell a boatload of these things, simply because they’re Dell.

    HP could probably do the same if they didn’t hide them on their website.

  2. From what I hear, HP Mini-Notes are selling like hotcakes. The only reason you don’t hear more about this is that they still represent a pretty minor portion of HP’s business. Asus on the other hand is making a big deal out of the Eee PC’s success because up until recently, most folks didn’t even know Asus made computers.

    I suspect Dell’s netbook will sell at least as well as HP’s thanks to a lower price, a well known name, and what seem to be decent specs. Does that mean it will actually offer any real advantages (other than price) over competing machines from Asus, HP or Acer? I doubt it.

  3. The Dell badge is without a doubt one of the biggest ‘differences’ on this machine.
    Their online ordering system is world-class and combined with their brand awareness and brand quality gives a browsing, pondering potential customer zero reason to not order. The same happened to me a few weeks ago. I wanted a new desktop, couldnt be bothered to do the research so went straight to Dell knowing that i’d get service, top-quartile product and value and no-hassle ordering. The same will happen to millions of others.

    Chippy.

  4. @ Brad

    I realize that they’re selling a lot. But, with a bit of a push, they could have something huge on their hands.

  5. IMO there are two types of Netbook buyers.

    First you have gadget geeks (dare I say most of the people who read this). This group does research, looks at all the options, accessories, mod-ability, cost, etc. Brand probably doesn’t mean a great deal to this group compared to say performance or keyboard configuration. We’re more interested in how it operates than the name on the lid and the warranty/service. It’s not to say those aren’t factors, but less than other points.

    Then you have the general population who will buy based on brand recognition and popularity. A Dell could probably sell for more based on the name. Yes the will sell a LOT of Netbooks…I doubt anyone would question that.

  6. unfortunately because of the name brand this will probably be 1 of the best selling netbooks, although it will be 1 of the worse overall (no F-keys KB, ugly design, etc). it’s ashame this will be the “face” of netbooks to the general public. i just wish for once Dell could do something right, when you follow quality products you really start to see how cheap everything is Dell does.

    oh ya prices were just release, it DOESNT even come close to being as good of a value as the Acer. once again huge disappointment by Dell.

  7. HP is selling a ton of Mini-notes in Asia. I’ve heard their sales are increasing in Asia 50%/ month on the 2133 which is likely why they are not pushing them harder in the US. They can’t make them fast enough. I think brand is a huge “feature” on netbooks as otherwise they are all more or less the same.

  8. I think the Dell and the HP are interesting cases.

    Because the 2133 is really posited as a “premium” miniature notebook, while the Dell won’t be presented that way I’d imagine (obviously we’ll have to see when it is out). But this, coupled with HP not overtly pushing their device outside of asia (not to say it isn’t selling well, more that it isn’t the center of attention) versus what will probably be quite a big push from Dell will make this an interesting match up.

    To me, I’ve had a good experience with Dell by way of XPS laptops – so I’m happy to buy their products again. Same deal with HP. Other brands though are more of an unknown, Acer for example, i’ve never really thought of as well built machines. So while brand isn’t necessarily a huge factor, I think it’s maybe one of those “little pebbles” that can build up to be a mountain of difference for any company that uses it right. Asus, for example, has definitely established wonderful brand recognition around their Eee PC’s.

  9. i remember when this thing was initially announced the readers at Engadget were super excited by it, now that it’s official they are blasting it big time.

    not that i am 1 to quote them, but i have to agree on this 1. this thing is a HUGE disappointment, overpriced & underspeced. i wont even get into the ugly design & Fn-less KB.

    the Acer & Lenovo prove to be a far far better value.

  10. Large manufacturers are best positioned to include netbooks under the umbrellas of existing brands (i.e. Inspiron 910, Amilo Mini) and leverage customers’ existing perceptions. Extending an existing brand also enables manufacturers to upsell potential buyers to more profitable offerings within the same product line.

    Given that competing netbooks have similar levels of capability, I expect manufacturers to focus on non-functional attributes such as price, size, aesthetics, ease of use, configurability, reliability, warranty and support, distribution channels, ecological design, etc. In this regard, the manufacturers that “get it right” will likely take a systems integration approach to determine the best combination of product features and other attributes.

Comments have been disabled for this post