<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Did Google Abandon Firefox?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/why-did-google-abandon-firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/why-did-google-abandon-firefox/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:43:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mehmet Korukmez</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/why-did-google-abandon-firefox/#comment-145997</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mehmet Korukmez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=19625#comment-145997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is sneakly becoming another enterprise compnay like Microsoft and they will start charging for all their services.
The nly difference is Google is hiding behind the open source technology to tell people how nice they are.

We know the reason behind it.
Collect more data from user and sell the collected data to third party companies for marketing.
Obvious example was when they launched Android Mobile Phone and Chrome.I had all applications free but now if you want to get applications you need to pay for many of them.

Firefox had over 1 Million download in one day and milions of user and developers are using firefox.At the end if not Google then Next options,yeah unfortutanely Miscrosost.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is sneakly becoming another enterprise compnay like Microsoft and they will start charging for all their services.<br />
The nly difference is Google is hiding behind the open source technology to tell people how nice they are.</p>
<p>We know the reason behind it.<br />
Collect more data from user and sell the collected data to third party companies for marketing.<br />
Obvious example was when they launched Android Mobile Phone and Chrome.I had all applications free but now if you want to get applications you need to pay for many of them.</p>
<p>Firefox had over 1 Million download in one day and milions of user and developers are using firefox.At the end if not Google then Next options,yeah unfortutanely Miscrosost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal Weaver</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/why-did-google-abandon-firefox/#comment-145996</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hal Weaver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=19625#comment-145996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You should check to see what &quot;to beg the question&quot; means.  It does not mean &quot;to raise the question&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should check to see what &#8220;to beg the question&#8221; means.  It does not mean &#8220;to raise the question&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Wall Web - &#160; Google’s Reflection in Chrome</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/why-did-google-abandon-firefox/#comment-145995</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[White Wall Web - &#160; Google’s Reflection in Chrome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=19625#comment-145995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] see they “abandon Firefox” article (http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/why-did-google-abandon-firefox/) The guys who are trying chrome will be predominantly Firefox users (IE users are slower to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] see they “abandon Firefox” article (<a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/why-did-google-abandon-firefox/" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/why-did-google-abandon-firefox/</a>) The guys who are trying chrome will be predominantly Firefox users (IE users are slower to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mishimash</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/why-did-google-abandon-firefox/#comment-145994</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mishimash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=19625#comment-145994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i love chrome because it provides bigger screen space especially in netbooks, i love the speed. its the best part of it. Because firefox takes 13 seconds to start up, while chrome only takes 2 to 3 seconds. Even IE is faster in start ups..

But i still use firefox because of the add ons...like zotero, ad block plus, etc... which are really useful for me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love chrome because it provides bigger screen space especially in netbooks, i love the speed. its the best part of it. Because firefox takes 13 seconds to start up, while chrome only takes 2 to 3 seconds. Even IE is faster in start ups..</p>
<p>But i still use firefox because of the add ons&#8230;like zotero, ad block plus, etc&#8230; which are really useful for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Reasons Internet Explorer Killer Google Chrome Becomes Top Browser</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/why-did-google-abandon-firefox/#comment-145993</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[10 Reasons Internet Explorer Killer Google Chrome Becomes Top Browser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 02:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=19625#comment-145993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Google has plenty of browser based experience; Google employees worked on Firefox and hired a Firefox lead engineer to help develop Chrome  CrunchBase Information on GoogleGoogleInformation provided by CrunchBase  &#160;3 Comments,&#160;&#160;What Say You? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google has plenty of browser based experience; Google employees worked on Firefox and hired a Firefox lead engineer to help develop Chrome  CrunchBase Information on GoogleGoogleInformation provided by CrunchBase  &nbsp;3 Comments,&nbsp;&nbsp;What Say You? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FBS Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bring on the Browser Wars</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/why-did-google-abandon-firefox/#comment-145992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FBS Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bring on the Browser Wars]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 00:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=19625#comment-145992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] FBS works very hard to support as many browsers as we can.&#160; We believe browser choice is key to the web promise of access to your data anytime, anywhere, and on any computer.&#160; Sometimes supporting multiple browsers is a real pain.&#160; One of our lead web developers, Brandon Medenwald, has written about this before on the FBS Blog in regards to the hoops and hacks we have to jump through for Internet Explorer, which often does things just different enough to cause headaches.&#160; Given this, the introduction of a new browser could be seen as just another headache to support.&#160; Further, there&#8217;s no lack of browsers out there now with IE, Firefox, Safari and Opera, so the release by Google of their new Chrome browser has some scratching their heads. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FBS works very hard to support as many browsers as we can.&nbsp; We believe browser choice is key to the web promise of access to your data anytime, anywhere, and on any computer.&nbsp; Sometimes supporting multiple browsers is a real pain.&nbsp; One of our lead web developers, Brandon Medenwald, has written about this before on the FBS Blog in regards to the hoops and hacks we have to jump through for Internet Explorer, which often does things just different enough to cause headaches.&nbsp; Given this, the introduction of a new browser could be seen as just another headache to support.&nbsp; Further, there&#8217;s no lack of browsers out there now with IE, Firefox, Safari and Opera, so the release by Google of their new Chrome browser has some scratching their heads. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Chrome &#171; eStuff</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/why-did-google-abandon-firefox/#comment-145991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Chrome &#171; eStuff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=19625#comment-145991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Gigaom - Why Did Google Abandon Firefox? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gigaom &#8211; Why Did Google Abandon Firefox? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: film fan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/why-did-google-abandon-firefox/#comment-145990</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[film fan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=19625#comment-145990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i keep learning about more and more little advantages and features with Chrome, with privacy, for example; now if only they would take care of it&#039;s cookie management glitches...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i keep learning about more and more little advantages and features with Chrome, with privacy, for example; now if only they would take care of it&#8217;s cookie management glitches&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Reasons Internet Explorer Killer Google Chrome Becomes Top Browser &#171; ToMuse.com: wonderings of a Web consumer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/why-did-google-abandon-firefox/#comment-145989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[10 Reasons Internet Explorer Killer Google Chrome Becomes Top Browser &#171; ToMuse.com: wonderings of a Web consumer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=19625#comment-145989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Google has plenty of browser based experience; Google employees worked on Firefox and hired a Firefox lead engineer to help develop Chrome [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google has plenty of browser based experience; Google employees worked on Firefox and hired a Firefox lead engineer to help develop Chrome [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cool</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/why-did-google-abandon-firefox/#comment-145988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cool]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=19625#comment-145988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i tried chrome. i must said that its 10 more stable than firefox. you must remember that chrome is build after firefox. its develop by the former lead engineer of firefox. this is the end of firefox. unless firefox start tied together with yahoo.

this is the war, only the strongest will survive.

firefox memory leak kill me, i don&#039;t see this problem in chrome yet. unless firefox start to redesign its core engine to solve this problem. firefox will be like internet explorer who who they tend to look down before.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i tried chrome. i must said that its 10 more stable than firefox. you must remember that chrome is build after firefox. its develop by the former lead engineer of firefox. this is the end of firefox. unless firefox start tied together with yahoo.</p>
<p>this is the war, only the strongest will survive.</p>
<p>firefox memory leak kill me, i don&#8217;t see this problem in chrome yet. unless firefox start to redesign its core engine to solve this problem. firefox will be like internet explorer who who they tend to look down before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
