<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three reasons Google Chrome could be the netbook browser of choice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:24:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sachendra Yadav</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google/#comment-365570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sachendra Yadav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 04:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google#comment-365570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google&#039;s Chrome is aimed at Windows, not IE&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is no longer about browser but about the an entire marketplace spread between desktop, mobile and web. With Chrome, Google’s taking a shot at Windows, not paltry Internet Explorer&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve covered this in more detail on my blog&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://sachendra.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/googles-chrome-is-aimed-at-windows-not-ie/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://sachendra.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/googles-chrome-is-aimed-at-windows-not-ie/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Google&#8217;s Chrome is aimed at Windows, not IE</p>
<p>This is no longer about browser but about the an entire marketplace spread between desktop, mobile and web. With Chrome, Google’s taking a shot at Windows, not paltry Internet Explorer</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve covered this in more detail on my blog<br />
<a href="http://sachendra.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/googles-chrome-is-aimed-at-windows-not-ie/" rel="nofollow">http://sachendra.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/googles-chrome-is-aimed-at-windows-not-ie/</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cobalt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google/#comment-365571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cobalt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google#comment-365571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Kevin, just wanted to say thanks for answering my question so quickly.  &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Kevin, just wanted to say thanks for answering my question so quickly.  </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gerard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google/#comment-365572</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Gerard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google#comment-365572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;&quot;We are so, so happy with Google Chrome,&quot; mumbled Mozilla CEO John Lilly through gritted teeth. &quot;That most of our income is from Google has no bearing on this statement.&quot; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://notnews.today.com/?p=57&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://notnews.today.com/?p=57&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>&#8220;We are so, so happy with Google Chrome,&#8221; mumbled Mozilla CEO John Lilly through gritted teeth. &#8220;That most of our income is from Google has no bearing on this statement.&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://notnews.today.com/?p=57" rel="nofollow">http://notnews.today.com/?p=57</a></p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhys Parsons</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google/#comment-365573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rhys Parsons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google#comment-365573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;Chrome&#039;s approach to have each tab, Javascript thread and plug-in running as independent processes could actually offer worse performance&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As I understand it, there&#039;ll be a process per tab. The JS and plug-ins will run in separate threads within the tab&#039;s process space.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Using separate processes for security reasons is something that we&#039;ve seen with server apps like apache and sendmail - interesting to see it in the GUI world too. Sun are doing a similar thing with the new JVM plugin in 6u10.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The thing that&#039;ll be most interesting is whether Google will develop some RIA environment to make the most of the improved JS performance. A standard set of components which render in Canvas elements that can bind to a JS model - similar to flex or Silverlight - would be the next logical step.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>&#8220;Chrome&#8217;s approach to have each tab, Javascript thread and plug-in running as independent processes could actually offer worse performance&#8221;</p>
<p>As I understand it, there&#8217;ll be a process per tab. The JS and plug-ins will run in separate threads within the tab&#8217;s process space.</p>
<p>Using separate processes for security reasons is something that we&#8217;ve seen with server apps like apache and sendmail &#8211; interesting to see it in the GUI world too. Sun are doing a similar thing with the new JVM plugin in 6u10.</p>
<p>The thing that&#8217;ll be most interesting is whether Google will develop some RIA environment to make the most of the improved JS performance. A standard set of components which render in Canvas elements that can bind to a JS model &#8211; similar to flex or Silverlight &#8211; would be the next logical step.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google/#comment-365574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google#comment-365574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cody, I see very limited similarity between the Google Chrome home page and the Linpus interface on the AAO. Out of the box and with limited or no Linux knowledge there&#039;s very little a user can do to modify the Linpus Lite desktop. You can go within one of the four program groups and choose which of the 3 apps you want to show on the home screen, but that&#039;s about it. Chrome will automatically set the 9 sites up based on your web-surfing habits. Perhaps, there&#039;s some visual similarity, but then you could say the same with the Xandros interface on the Eee PC. Still, it&#039;s mainly visual and less of a functional similarity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Curt, excellent point and I&#039;m looking forward to the new JVM!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Cody, I see very limited similarity between the Google Chrome home page and the Linpus interface on the AAO. Out of the box and with limited or no Linux knowledge there&#8217;s very little a user can do to modify the Linpus Lite desktop. You can go within one of the four program groups and choose which of the 3 apps you want to show on the home screen, but that&#8217;s about it. Chrome will automatically set the 9 sites up based on your web-surfing habits. Perhaps, there&#8217;s some visual similarity, but then you could say the same with the Xandros interface on the Eee PC. Still, it&#8217;s mainly visual and less of a functional similarity.</p>
<p>Curt, excellent point and I&#8217;m looking forward to the new JVM!</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis Carmack</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google/#comment-365575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curtis Carmack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google#comment-365575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kevin,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think the V8 engine is another great plus, especially if it ends up being optimized for lower power machines. The JVM&#039;s in currently available browsers could be a lot better. It sounds like Google is addressing this in Chrome, which should make for a better experience with all kinds of web apps, not just Google apps.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Curt&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>I think the V8 engine is another great plus, especially if it ends up being optimized for lower power machines. The JVM&#8217;s in currently available browsers could be a lot better. It sounds like Google is addressing this in Chrome, which should make for a better experience with all kinds of web apps, not just Google apps.</p>
<p>Curt</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody B</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google/#comment-365576</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cody B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google#comment-365576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;So OS=Browser and Tab=Application in Chrome?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Kevin, to me the interface of the home screen sounds a lot like the Linpus interface that the Acer Aspire 1 had.  What is your thought on that?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>So OS=Browser and Tab=Application in Chrome?</p>
<p>Kevin, to me the interface of the home screen sounds a lot like the Linpus interface that the Acer Aspire 1 had.  What is your thought on that?</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google/#comment-365577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google#comment-365577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;If they&#039;re smart, only the current tab will take up CPU time. The other tabs should drop to very low priority background processes. If Google does not do that, I&#039;d be VERY surprised.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>If they&#8217;re smart, only the current tab will take up CPU time. The other tabs should drop to very low priority background processes. If Google does not do that, I&#8217;d be VERY surprised.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Link</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google/#comment-365578</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Link]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google#comment-365578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Alright, thank you google!&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;ve been &#039;faking&#039; this w/ firefox 3 by running different profiles for each app (firefox &lt;a href=&quot;http://gmail.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://gmail.com&lt;/a&gt; -P gmail -no-remote) which runs firefox in a different process as long as you use a different profile name.  So for reader, gmail, docs etc I have no interference.  It&#039;s cumbersome to setup though and has none of the other enhancements like javascript.  But until they release for linux/mac this is a great way to isolate apps in firefox.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Alright, thank you google!<br />
I&#8217;ve been &#8216;faking&#8217; this w/ firefox 3 by running different profiles for each app (firefox <a href="http://gmail.com" rel="nofollow">http://gmail.com</a> -P gmail -no-remote) which runs firefox in a different process as long as you use a different profile name.  So for reader, gmail, docs etc I have no interference.  It&#8217;s cumbersome to setup though and has none of the other enhancements like javascript.  But until they release for linux/mac this is a great way to isolate apps in firefox.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google/#comment-365579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/reasons-google#comment-365579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;cobolt, after reading through the comic book, I gather that Gears will gain much more prominence than it has today. It looks to me that if developers want to create functionality for Chrome, they&#039;ll be doing so through Gears so it&#039;s going be a bigger part of the browser with Chrome. Think of the XUL framework for Firefox... it will be used to code new features for the browser.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>cobolt, after reading through the comic book, I gather that Gears will gain much more prominence than it has today. It looks to me that if developers want to create functionality for Chrome, they&#8217;ll be doing so through Gears so it&#8217;s going be a bigger part of the browser with Chrome. Think of the XUL framework for Firefox&#8230; it will be used to code new features for the browser.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
