<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For Qwest, FTTN Not An Option, Necessity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/08/25/for-qwest-fttn-not-an-option-necessity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/25/for-qwest-fttn-not-an-option-necessity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:07:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qwest Looks To Sell Long-Haul Network</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/25/for-qwest-fttn-not-an-option-necessity/#comment-144840</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Qwest Looks To Sell Long-Haul Network]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=18589#comment-144840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Stacey Higginbotham  &#124; Thursday, April 2, 2009 &#124; 7:02 AM PT &#124; 0 comments    Qwest Communications, the regional telephone provider, is looking to sell its long-haul network according to a story in the Wall Street Journal. The company, which has $14 billion in debt, wants to continue its consumer last-mile business, which serves 11.6 million customers. However, without a wireless business (Qwest resells Verizon Wireless) the nation&#8217;s third-largest phone company has little to fall back on as landline losses accelerate and faster cable connections lure consumers away from DSL. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stacey Higginbotham  | Thursday, April 2, 2009 | 7:02 AM PT | 0 comments    Qwest Communications, the regional telephone provider, is looking to sell its long-haul network according to a story in the Wall Street Journal. The company, which has $14 billion in debt, wants to continue its consumer last-mile business, which serves 11.6 million customers. However, without a wireless business (Qwest resells Verizon Wireless) the nation&#8217;s third-largest phone company has little to fall back on as landline losses accelerate and faster cable connections lure consumers away from DSL. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Hill</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/25/for-qwest-fttn-not-an-option-necessity/#comment-144839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald Hill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=18589#comment-144839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny, considering I spoke with one of the line techs here in my neck o&#039; the woods who said the new FTTN offerings would never make it out of Denver. They put it all on regulation. Which saddened me, since Qwest actually beats the rinky-dink cableco both in speed and price in these here parts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, considering I spoke with one of the line techs here in my neck o&#8217; the woods who said the new FTTN offerings would never make it out of Denver. They put it all on regulation. Which saddened me, since Qwest actually beats the rinky-dink cableco both in speed and price in these here parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron J. Grier</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/25/for-qwest-fttn-not-an-option-necessity/#comment-144838</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron J. Grier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=18589#comment-144838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;All these moves, including FTTN are optional for Qwest; they’re a necessity.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

an optional necessity?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>All these moves, including FTTN are optional for Qwest; they’re a necessity.</p></blockquote>
<p>an optional necessity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/25/for-qwest-fttn-not-an-option-necessity/#comment-144837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=18589#comment-144837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Doug Mohney

on verizon point, actually in parts of their foot print even in outer boroughs of new york, there were a lot of cables that were overhead. I think this is a justification, though in the end they know they need to go all fiber.

Funny for a company that started off as a fiber operator.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Doug Mohney</p>
<p>on verizon point, actually in parts of their foot print even in outer boroughs of new york, there were a lot of cables that were overhead. I think this is a justification, though in the end they know they need to go all fiber.</p>
<p>Funny for a company that started off as a fiber operator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Mohney</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/25/for-qwest-fttn-not-an-option-necessity/#comment-144836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Mohney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=18589#comment-144836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Poll is smokescreening excuses for the fact Qwest just doesn&#039;t have the cash.

Verizon&#039;s plant is &quot;aerial&quot;? Next time I&#039;m in NYC, I&#039;ll have to look for the telephone poles... and there are more than enough cases where Verizon contractors have *ahem* screwed up trenching to demonstrate that its fiber deployment does, indeed, require a lot of digging.

I&#039;m also more than willing to bet Qwest has its share of poles across the plains...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poll is smokescreening excuses for the fact Qwest just doesn&#8217;t have the cash.</p>
<p>Verizon&#8217;s plant is &#8220;aerial&#8221;? Next time I&#8217;m in NYC, I&#8217;ll have to look for the telephone poles&#8230; and there are more than enough cases where Verizon contractors have *ahem* screwed up trenching to demonstrate that its fiber deployment does, indeed, require a lot of digging.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also more than willing to bet Qwest has its share of poles across the plains&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

