<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why 3-D TV Technology Is All Hype</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/why-3-d-tv-technology-is-all-hype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/why-3-d-tv-technology-is-all-hype/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: garry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/why-3-d-tv-technology-is-all-hype/#comment-975479</link>
		<dc:creator>garry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=18358#comment-975479</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;to ross stokel---what happened to your 3-D televison from 1990, i have the programme &#039;beyond 2000&#039; on video, and often show your system to friends, and wonder why it has not yet been perfected and in use? it certainly worked for me--on that programme--and the only poblem i can see is the peripheral one---the two screens that you don&#039;t watch, on either side.....the programme &#039;can we help&#039; on ABC_TV has had a segment on a new type of 3-D , but i don&#039;t think they demonstrated it......garry--brisbane&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to ross stokel&#8212;what happened to your 3-D televison from 1990, i have the programme &#8216;beyond 2000&#8242; on video, and often show your system to friends, and wonder why it has not yet been perfected and in use? it certainly worked for me&#8211;on that programme&#8211;and the only poblem i can see is the peripheral one&#8212;the two screens that you don&#8217;t watch, on either side&#8230;..the programme &#8216;can we help&#8217; on ABC_TV has had a segment on a new type of 3-D , but i don&#8217;t think they demonstrated it&#8230;&#8230;garry&#8211;brisbane</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Stokell</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/why-3-d-tv-technology-is-all-hype/#comment-934881</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Stokell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=18358#comment-934881</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Having dedicated the last twenty five years to stereoscopic imaging research and describing/publishing the unequivocal standard for stereoscopic capture, process and display several times during this period, why are so many groups attempting to &quot;set&quot; new standards. There is only one.
It is the one that complements, corresponds and is in concert with the human physiology.
If &quot;Journey to the Centre of the Earth&quot; is an example of the current state-of-the-art commercial (3D) technology, this proves that producers do not understand the fundamental science relating to visualisation/sight.
Ross Stokell, Futurist, Interactive Visualisation.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having dedicated the last twenty five years to stereoscopic imaging research and describing/publishing the unequivocal standard for stereoscopic capture, process and display several times during this period, why are so many groups attempting to &#8220;set&#8221; new standards. There is only one.
It is the one that complements, corresponds and is in concert with the human physiology.
If &#8220;Journey to the Centre of the Earth&#8221; is an example of the current state-of-the-art commercial (3D) technology, this proves that producers do not understand the fundamental science relating to visualisation/sight.
Ross Stokell, Futurist, Interactive Visualisation.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podcast Zeitgeist, Jan. 10 &#171; Palafo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/why-3-d-tv-technology-is-all-hype/#comment-921277</link>
		<dc:creator>Podcast Zeitgeist, Jan. 10 &#171; Palafo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=18358#comment-921277</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] iTunes DRM decision had not). They were rightly skeptical of iPhone Nano rumors. Some discussion of 3D TVs: still too blurry. The value of location-aware laptops.The new Palm Phone and the &#8220;fat middle.&#8221; (Seems [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iTunes DRM decision had not). They were rightly skeptical of iPhone Nano rumors. Some discussion of 3D TVs: still too blurry. The value of location-aware laptops.The new Palm Phone and the &#8220;fat middle.&#8221; (Seems [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CES Cheat Sheet: How to Argue that 3-D Sucks</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/why-3-d-tv-technology-is-all-hype/#comment-920919</link>
		<dc:creator>CES Cheat Sheet: How to Argue that 3-D Sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=18358#comment-920919</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] even if you rush to Best Buy, find 3-D gear, make sure it&#8217;s compatible and set it up, there&#8217;s no guarantee there will be anything you want to watch. If we all wait for the content and standards fights to settle out, the studios may decide [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] even if you rush to Best Buy, find 3-D gear, make sure it&#8217;s compatible and set it up, there&#8217;s no guarantee there will be anything you want to watch. If we all wait for the content and standards fights to settle out, the studios may decide [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei State</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/why-3-d-tv-technology-is-all-hype/#comment-901576</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei State</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 07:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=18358#comment-901576</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Miss Higginbotham, Paul is right.  The 3D TV sets work today, if one knows how to view or generate 3D imagery on a computer (and you can take stereo pictures with your off-the-shelf digital camera).  I have such a set at home and use it every day.  There just isn&#039;t any stereoscopic Hollywood movie content available for them at this point, but neither Samsung nor Mitsubishi claim that.  The required active shutter glasses can be bought for about $100.
Furthermore, your explanation about how autostereoscopic displays work is purest BS and shows that you have zero understanding of that technology.  So now, how much of the rest of your article shall we believe?  At least there was a cute word play at the end.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Andrei State
Senior Research Scientist
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miss Higginbotham, Paul is right.  The 3D TV sets work today, if one knows how to view or generate 3D imagery on a computer (and you can take stereo pictures with your off-the-shelf digital camera).  I have such a set at home and use it every day.  There just isn&#8217;t any stereoscopic Hollywood movie content available for them at this point, but neither Samsung nor Mitsubishi claim that.  The required active shutter glasses can be bought for about $100.
Furthermore, your explanation about how autostereoscopic displays work is purest BS and shows that you have zero understanding of that technology.  So now, how much of the rest of your article shall we believe?  At least there was a cute word play at the end.</p>

<p>Andrei State
Senior Research Scientist
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/why-3-d-tv-technology-is-all-hype/#comment-898910</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=18358#comment-898910</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Consumer level 3D is starting to get cheaper. I&#039;ve seen footage from professionals on a Zalman 22&quot; LCD and I&#039;m thoroughly impressed. Next, year, more and more TVs and monitors will be 3D ready. Now to simply define what that means :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumer level 3D is starting to get cheaper. I&#8217;ve seen footage from professionals on a Zalman 22&#8243; LCD and I&#8217;m thoroughly impressed. Next, year, more and more TVs and monitors will be 3D ready. Now to simply define what that means :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/why-3-d-tv-technology-is-all-hype/#comment-895524</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 02:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=18358#comment-895524</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Stacey, you can easily buy the software and glasses that work perfectly with the Samsung 3D capable TV&#039;s from DDD if Best Buy is out of stock. http://www.DDD.com
No hype, it works here and now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;From next year, the 3D TV&#039;s will have the 3D chips built in.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacey, you can easily buy the software and glasses that work perfectly with the Samsung 3D capable TV&#8217;s from DDD if Best Buy is out of stock. <a href="http://www.DDD.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.DDD.com</a>
No hype, it works here and now.</p>

<p>From next year, the 3D TV&#8217;s will have the 3D chips built in.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryll Strauss</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/why-3-d-tv-technology-is-all-hype/#comment-895314</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryll Strauss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 21:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=18358#comment-895314</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;3D is coming for theaters and home use. We&#039;re just at the start of the curve, but a convergence of technology, content, and standards will make it possible. My response was too long to include here, so see it on my blog: 
http://blog.daryll.net/archives/24&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3D is coming for theaters and home use. We&#8217;re just at the start of the curve, but a convergence of technology, content, and standards will make it possible. My response was too long to include here, so see it on my blog: 
<a href="http://blog.daryll.net/archives/24" rel="nofollow">http://blog.daryll.net/archives/24</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amped D :: Why 3D TV Technology is Coming</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/why-3-d-tv-technology-is-all-hype/#comment-895313</link>
		<dc:creator>Amped D :: Why 3D TV Technology is Coming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 21:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=18358#comment-895313</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] post is a response to Stacey Higginbotham&#8217;s article on GigaOM entitled Why 3-D TV Technology Is All Hype. In her article she points out that the Electronic Technology Center&#8217;s efforts are aimed at [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post is a response to Stacey Higginbotham&#8217;s article on GigaOM entitled Why 3-D TV Technology Is All Hype. In her article she points out that the Electronic Technology Center&#8217;s efforts are aimed at [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Koopferstock</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/why-3-d-tv-technology-is-all-hype/#comment-895310</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Koopferstock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=18358#comment-895310</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If these movies that are shot in 3D become popular, consumers&#039; imaginations are going to start getting fired up about the possibility of 3D for the home theatre and PC.  This could bring 3D into the home faster than you might think.  After trying a bunch of the different 3D displays at SIGGRAPH last week, I definitely saw some that were quite impressive (and didn&#039;t give me a headache).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, if this batch of 3D movies doesn&#039;t go over well, all this buzz might be for naught, or at least it may lengthen the adoption cycle.  These next 12 months should be interesting for all the industries related to 3D.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;www.ENLIGHTEN3D.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If these movies that are shot in 3D become popular, consumers&#8217; imaginations are going to start getting fired up about the possibility of 3D for the home theatre and PC.  This could bring 3D into the home faster than you might think.  After trying a bunch of the different 3D displays at SIGGRAPH last week, I definitely saw some that were quite impressive (and didn&#8217;t give me a headache).</p>

<p>However, if this batch of 3D movies doesn&#8217;t go over well, all this buzz might be for naught, or at least it may lengthen the adoption cycle.  These next 12 months should be interesting for all the industries related to 3D.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.ENLIGHTEN3D.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ENLIGHTEN3D.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
