<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Risks vs. Rewards of Cloud Computing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/the-risks-vs-rewards-of-cloud-computing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/the-risks-vs-rewards-of-cloud-computing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebDesignMiami</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/the-risks-vs-rewards-of-cloud-computing/#comment-75477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WebDesignMiami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 02:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/08/22/the-risks-vs-rewards-of-cloud-computing/#comment-75477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yo, James Urquhart:

I am still waiting for your &quot;response&quot;...

Bruce Arnold
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pervasivepersuasion.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Web Design Miami Florida&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo, James Urquhart:</p>
<p>I am still waiting for your &#8220;response&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Bruce Arnold<br />
<a href="http://www.pervasivepersuasion.com/" rel="nofollow">Web Design Miami Florida</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/the-risks-vs-rewards-of-cloud-computing/#comment-75476</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 21:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/08/22/the-risks-vs-rewards-of-cloud-computing/#comment-75476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I get so angry whenever this comes up. The cloud is a helluva lot more stable and reliable than your PC. The only difference is that when it breaks you can&#039;t fix it.

On the other hand it means you don&#039;t have to fix it, and teams of people who get paid ~$80,000 a year to know how to fix things are on call to fix them, rather than attempting to do it yourself and fucking it up further or asking the kid down the street who means well but can&#039;t do near as good a job in twice the time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get so angry whenever this comes up. The cloud is a helluva lot more stable and reliable than your PC. The only difference is that when it breaks you can&#8217;t fix it.</p>
<p>On the other hand it means you don&#8217;t have to fix it, and teams of people who get paid ~$80,000 a year to know how to fix things are on call to fix them, rather than attempting to do it yourself and fucking it up further or asking the kid down the street who means well but can&#8217;t do near as good a job in twice the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenny Rachitsky</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/the-risks-vs-rewards-of-cloud-computing/#comment-75475</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lenny Rachitsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/08/22/the-risks-vs-rewards-of-cloud-computing/#comment-75475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saw the same story. It seems like what&#039;s needed is a Online Users Bill of Rights:

http://www.transparentuptime.com/2008/08/what-if-cloud-disappeared-tomorrow.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw the same story. It seems like what&#8217;s needed is a Online Users Bill of Rights:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.transparentuptime.com/2008/08/what-if-cloud-disappeared-tomorrow.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.transparentuptime.com/2008/08/what-if-cloud-disappeared-tomorrow.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Urquhart</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/the-risks-vs-rewards-of-cloud-computing/#comment-75474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Urquhart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 21:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/08/22/the-risks-vs-rewards-of-cloud-computing/#comment-75474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all, Bruce Arnold has been hacking that &quot;nothing is ever new&quot; post across the blogosphere.  I&#039;ll respond to it on my blog, &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.jamesurquhart.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Wisdom of Clouds&lt;/a&gt; tonight.

Now, in reference to your excellent post, you might be interested in my recent stab at a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/08/cloud-computing-bill-of-rights.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cloud Computing Bill of Rights&lt;/a&gt;.  One of the key articles has to do with service level ownership.  The short-short of how this applies to your situation (and that of all the other consumers out there) is that your level of service is your responsibility.  If you want highly reliable, then you must do the work necessary to enhance your provider&#039;s service.  Yes, do backups, if you think you might need them someday.  Yes, distribute your work if you fear outright failure of any of your vendors...etc, etc, etc.

This is the paradox of the cloud: the technology will be much more reliable than owning your own computer and/or services due to redundancy, etc., but at the same time, you are more responsible than ever for insuring your own data.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, Bruce Arnold has been hacking that &#8220;nothing is ever new&#8221; post across the blogosphere.  I&#8217;ll respond to it on my blog, <a href="http://blog.jamesurquhart.com" rel="nofollow">The Wisdom of Clouds</a> tonight.</p>
<p>Now, in reference to your excellent post, you might be interested in my recent stab at a <a href="http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/08/cloud-computing-bill-of-rights.html" rel="nofollow">Cloud Computing Bill of Rights</a>.  One of the key articles has to do with service level ownership.  The short-short of how this applies to your situation (and that of all the other consumers out there) is that your level of service is your responsibility.  If you want highly reliable, then you must do the work necessary to enhance your provider&#8217;s service.  Yes, do backups, if you think you might need them someday.  Yes, distribute your work if you fear outright failure of any of your vendors&#8230;etc, etc, etc.</p>
<p>This is the paradox of the cloud: the technology will be much more reliable than owning your own computer and/or services due to redundancy, etc., but at the same time, you are more responsible than ever for insuring your own data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebDesignMiami</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/22/the-risks-vs-rewards-of-cloud-computing/#comment-75473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WebDesignMiami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 21:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/08/22/the-risks-vs-rewards-of-cloud-computing/#comment-75473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kudos to the Cloud Crowd for Re-Inventing the Wheel!

One thing 30 years in the IT industry has taught me is that the more things
change, the more they stay the same.  Another is that the only memory we
seem to access is short-term.  A third is that techno-marketeers rely on
that, so they can put labels like &quot;revolutionary&quot; and &quot;innovative&quot; on
platforms, products and services that are mere re-inventions of the wheel
... and often poor copies at that.

A good example is all the latest buzz about &quot;Cloud Computing&quot; in general and
&quot;SaaS&quot; (software as a service) in particular:

http://tinyurl.com/6let8x

Both terms are bogus.  The only true cloud computing takes place in
aircraft.  What they&#039;re actually referring to by &quot;the cloud&quot; is a
large-scale and often remotely and/or centrally managed hardware platform.
We have had those since the dawn of automated IT.  IBM calls them
&quot;mainframes&quot;:

http://tinyurl.com/5kdhcb

The only innovation offered by today&#039;s cloud crowd is actually more of a
speculation, i.e. that server farms can deliver the same solid performance
as Big Iron.  And even that&#039;s not original.  Anyone remember Datapoint&#039;s
ARCnet, or DEC&#039;s VAXclusters?  Whatever happened to those guys, anyway...?

And as for SaaS, selling the sizzle while keeping the steak is a marketing
ploy most rightfully accredited to society&#039;s oldest profession.  Its first
application in IT was (and for many still is) known as the &quot;service bureau&quot;.
And I don&#039;t mean the contemporary service bureau (mis)conception labelled
&quot;Service 2.0&quot; by a Wikipedia contributor whose historical perspective is
apparently constrained to four years:

http://tinyurl.com/5fpb8e

Instead, I mean the computer service bureau industry that spawned ADAPSO
(the Association of Data Processing Service Organizations) in 1960, and
whose chronology comprises a notable part of the IEEE&#039;s &quot;Annals of the
History of Computing&quot;:

http://tinyurl.com/5lvjdl

So ... for any of you slide rule-toting, pocket-protected keypunch-card
cowboys who may be just coming out of a fifty-year coma, let me give you a
quick IT update:

1.  &quot;Mainframe&quot; is now &quot;Cloud&quot; (with concomitant ethereal substance).

2.  &quot;Terminal&quot; is now &quot;Web Browser&quot; (with much cooler games, and infinitely
more distractions).

3.  &quot;Service Bureau&quot; is now &quot;Saas&quot; (but app upgrades are just as painful,
and custom mods equally elusive).

4.  Most IT buzzwords boil down to techno-hyped BS (just as they always
have).

Bruce Arnold
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.PervasivePersuasion.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Web Design Miami Florida&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos to the Cloud Crowd for Re-Inventing the Wheel!</p>
<p>One thing 30 years in the IT industry has taught me is that the more things<br />
change, the more they stay the same.  Another is that the only memory we<br />
seem to access is short-term.  A third is that techno-marketeers rely on<br />
that, so they can put labels like &#8220;revolutionary&#8221; and &#8220;innovative&#8221; on<br />
platforms, products and services that are mere re-inventions of the wheel<br />
&#8230; and often poor copies at that.</p>
<p>A good example is all the latest buzz about &#8220;Cloud Computing&#8221; in general and<br />
&#8220;SaaS&#8221; (software as a service) in particular:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/6let8x" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6let8x</a></p>
<p>Both terms are bogus.  The only true cloud computing takes place in<br />
aircraft.  What they&#8217;re actually referring to by &#8220;the cloud&#8221; is a<br />
large-scale and often remotely and/or centrally managed hardware platform.<br />
We have had those since the dawn of automated IT.  IBM calls them<br />
&#8220;mainframes&#8221;:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/5kdhcb" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/5kdhcb</a></p>
<p>The only innovation offered by today&#8217;s cloud crowd is actually more of a<br />
speculation, i.e. that server farms can deliver the same solid performance<br />
as Big Iron.  And even that&#8217;s not original.  Anyone remember Datapoint&#8217;s<br />
ARCnet, or DEC&#8217;s VAXclusters?  Whatever happened to those guys, anyway&#8230;?</p>
<p>And as for SaaS, selling the sizzle while keeping the steak is a marketing<br />
ploy most rightfully accredited to society&#8217;s oldest profession.  Its first<br />
application in IT was (and for many still is) known as the &#8220;service bureau&#8221;.<br />
And I don&#8217;t mean the contemporary service bureau (mis)conception labelled<br />
&#8220;Service 2.0&#8243; by a Wikipedia contributor whose historical perspective is<br />
apparently constrained to four years:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/5fpb8e" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/5fpb8e</a></p>
<p>Instead, I mean the computer service bureau industry that spawned ADAPSO<br />
(the Association of Data Processing Service Organizations) in 1960, and<br />
whose chronology comprises a notable part of the IEEE&#8217;s &#8220;Annals of the<br />
History of Computing&#8221;:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/5lvjdl" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/5lvjdl</a></p>
<p>So &#8230; for any of you slide rule-toting, pocket-protected keypunch-card<br />
cowboys who may be just coming out of a fifty-year coma, let me give you a<br />
quick IT update:</p>
<p>1.  &#8220;Mainframe&#8221; is now &#8220;Cloud&#8221; (with concomitant ethereal substance).</p>
<p>2.  &#8220;Terminal&#8221; is now &#8220;Web Browser&#8221; (with much cooler games, and infinitely<br />
more distractions).</p>
<p>3.  &#8220;Service Bureau&#8221; is now &#8220;Saas&#8221; (but app upgrades are just as painful,<br />
and custom mods equally elusive).</p>
<p>4.  Most IT buzzwords boil down to techno-hyped BS (just as they always<br />
have).</p>
<p>Bruce Arnold<br />
<a href="http://www.PervasivePersuasion.com" rel="nofollow">Web Design Miami Florida</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
