4 Comments

Summary:

When we looked at last year’s Telework Report from CDW, the federal government stood out as a leader in encouraging telecommuting. This year’s report, which should be available on the CDW site shortly, paints a different picture. Thanks to strong growth in support from corporate IT […]

When we looked at last year’s Telework Report from CDW, the federal government stood out as a leader in encouraging telecommuting. This year’s report, which should be available on the CDW site shortly, paints a different picture. Thanks to strong growth in support from corporate IT departments, as well as price pressure at the gas pump, private sector telework has surged.

The simplest bottom-line numbers: 17% of Federal employees telework on a regular basis, as do 14% of private-sector employees. There’s been a marked change in the reasons employees offer for being interested in telework as well. Compared to last year, the number of people who are motivated by lowered expenses – primarily commuting expenses – has jumped from 31% to 67%. (This data correlates well with an IBM study from earlier this year that found $4.50 per gallon gas would be the breaking point for many commuters).

There are other points of interest in the CDW report as well. I was struck by the divergence in how often people telework. At the Federal level, only 6% of teleworkers do so for five days per week; that number is 30% in the private sector. Private workers also lead at 3 and 4 days per week, while 30% of Federal teleworkers do so less than one day per week. Overall, it seems clear that telecommuting is not the all-or-nothing option that it’s sometimes portrayed as; many web workers are only enabled by the web part-time, and in a traditional office setting the rest of the time.

68% of private sector employees, and 57% of federal ones, say the would telework if they had the option. The overwhelming reason for doing so: “more flexibility” (though “high gas prices” was not far behind). As for those who would skip it, the leading concern was isolation from fellow employees, followed by not wanting to work from home and reduced productivity.

The bottom line is simple: telework is here to stay, and given the current economic picture, it continues to make gains as a mainstream option. Those of us who work on the web full-time, though, are still the exception rather than the rule, even in the teleworking ranks.

  1. Great update. Telecommuting is the way to go. Why wasting gasoline when you can conduct your business online 24/7?

    You can conduct web meeting and online training 24/7 – real-time, off-time, and anytime at eLearningZoom.com.

    http://www.eLearningZoom.com

    Share
  2. I’m really curious about the long term effects. For those driven fuel costs, will the numbers go back down if fuel costs go down? I didn’t become a WW because of fuel, for me it was all quality of life stuff, but I don’t think I could go back.

    As for the reasons against, wow, anyone who’s done their laundry, made soup, and met that deadline without spending X hours commuting knows that “reduced productivity” just ain’t so.

    Conceded: It’s not for everyone and home environments vary. But I hope I never have to go back.

    Share
  3. Perhaps another approach? – Distributed workplace might make remote working more viable for a wider segment of the workforce. I am interested in your comments and feedback to the information posted at http://www.pocketsnet.com.

    Best regards,

    Michael Shear

    Share
  4. I’d be a government employee if I didn’t need to work from home, but as a contractor I cost less! Government overheads are larger, though I don’t think they need to be. Hope progress in this area comes soon!

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post