13 Comments

Summary:

It’s been a tale of two Olympics for NBC. On the one hand, it’s been a monster success, pulling in record numbers on both new and oldteevee (except in San Francisco). On the other hand, between tape delays and a crummy online video experience, it’s also […]

It’s been a tale of two Olympics for NBC. On the one hand, it’s been a monster success, pulling in record numbers on both new and oldteevee (except in San Francisco). On the other hand, between tape delays and a crummy online video experience, it’s also been pretty abysmal.

Perhaps smelling blood in the water, ESPN said it was interested carrying the 2014 and 2016 Olympics — and that it would run the games live, from coast-to-coast.

But before ESPN places its bid (and hopefully wins to make up for NBC’s Olympic sins), we at NewTeeVee humbly offer up suggestions to improve the experience for the 2010 games.

1. Get rid of tape delays for both television and online video. Granted, with the games in Vancouver, issues of time delays in the U.S. won’t be as big an issue, but it’s the principle. Mr. Zucker may have “bottled” excitement by delaying people’s access to action, but in an age of instant news alerts, it’s an Olympic task just to avoid results from the games.

The latest Nielsen numbers show that an average of 4.2 million people are following the games on NBCOlympics.com each day at work. Just visiting the front page of the NBC Olympics site at lunch today spoiled who won in Usain Bolt’s 200 meter race. Instead, what if NBC had replaced the text (and picture of the winner) with video of the race accompanied by a pre-roll? The outcome is already ruined and there is little incentive to turn on the TV to watch it, the network could at least squeeze a little more money out of it online.

2. Use what people have. This was a big test for Microsoft’s Silverlight video technology. And while Silverlight worked reliably and the video quality was good, it’s still a hassle downloading new software. It either turns people off or literally turns them away for having an incompatible system.

3. Make video easy to find. What good is that whopping 2,200 hours of video if people can’t find what they’re looking for? Instead of adding features like the four simultaneous streams or the picture-in-picture, focus on the user experience. Labeling a video “Singles” accompanied by a picture of a face gives me no indication about what sport I’d be watching. Is “Most Watched” for the day or the week or from the whole event? I don’t know; it doesn’t say.

4. Set the video free. Viewers should be able to create and post their own highlights on their blogs or social networks. The Olympics are all about uniting and sharing our feelings over a win or a loss or even just a great game, so let people do that. You can even put an ad on it.

5. Don’t be jerks. If Michael Phelps is swimming or newly-minted Olympic sensation Usain Bolt is running, don’t make people wait. Let us enjoy the moment when it actually is a moment. And don’t deny someone the games just because they happen to subscribe to the wrong cable service.

It will be interesting to see what happens as the web video industry matures in the coming years. By 2010 there will be all sorts of online video advances (crossing fingers for full HD). Hopefully NBC’s oldteevee success at these games won’t embolden it to clamp down even further on newteevee the next go ’round.

But what do you think? What would have made your online Olympics experience a better one? Leave a comment and let us know.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Looking at these numbers: http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/20/big-internet-numbers-for-olympics-are-but-still-a-rounding-error-when-compared-to-television/4743

    27 minutes of video watched per person is pretty darn impressive.

    Personally I’ve found the video quality excellent on the site. I have a 24″ iMac and have kept it open much of the day watching during work. The navigation on the site is suboptimal (your point on finding the video is very valid). Once found though I’ve been very happy.

  2. JPMorgen: John Peter Merrick from Portland Oregon Wednesday, August 20, 2008

    I AGREE IT SUCKED DUCK PRO WISE: Personaly it did it’s job:

    ***JAVA it to two web sides as one page to the ones who LOVE IT on tv also to then the ones who want to be raped in knowing and show boating they know the show ehoh:

    ***Freaken Monkey Heads TAKE OFF Tape Delay on the games as I bet those slots in the west cost at 1pm are a much during normal time at 3am. Lets see what the USA can be in knowing with all there groups of friends then keeping them in there sinbin less time one on one conecting there love life one bar at a time:

    ***Online video OK but the games let us chose not shuffle nothing in wining:

    ***BC will it be Canada FRENCH or the town it holds in ethnics and values?

    Well have fun in your sun

    Your operatic grasshopper

    JPMorgen: John Peter Merrick from Portland Oregon

  3. for a moment when i read the headline i thought book keepers might be a part of the picture. ;)

  4. Interesting post. I haven’t actually been watching any of the Olympics, purely because I have all day access to the internet and avoiding seeing the results (which spoils watching the game afterwards) is pretty much impossible.

    Also interested to know where the 2010 games and the 2014 games are being held ;P

  5. Mark Schoneveld Thursday, August 21, 2008

    You know what the really strange thing has been for me? I’m so used to watching time-independent video that it doesn’t even bother me one bit to watch Michael Phelps two days after the fact, or watch Usain Bolt on some pixelated 320×240 also-ran web video site.

    At least we can watch the races over and over and over to feel that Gold Medal fever!

  6. ESPN Swings for the Online Fences « NewTeeVee Thursday, August 21, 2008

    [...] this week, ESPN said it was interested in bidding for the 2014 and 2016 Olympic games (with no tape delays). If ESPN was [...]

  7. I wonder how many people are motivated to watch certain events because they’ve been spoiled, and not merely in spite of it?

    For example, I don’t care at all about the 100m usually, but knowing that there was a world record and a controversy (about “showboating” at the end) increased my interest to the point that I wanted to watch it in prime time.

  8. NFL Kicks Off Online Streaming Tonight « NewTeeVee Thursday, September 4, 2008

    [...] The game begins at 7 p.m. ET, and will feature four different camera angles to choose from, picture-in-picture functionality, and real-time commentary. Interestingly, the game requires Flash, not Silverlight, which NBC was used for the Olympics. [...]

  9. NFL Kicks Off Online Streaming Tonight | Business Friday, September 5, 2008

    [...] The game begins at 7 p.m. ET, and will feature four different camera angles to choose from, picture-in-picture functionality, and real-time commentary. Interestingly, the game requires Flash, not Silverlight, which NBC was used for the Olympics. [...]

  10. Online 2010 Olympics Coverage to Have an Authentication Hurdle Tuesday, April 14, 2009

    [...] and Comcast are already working on their own authentication systems. As for NBC, the network was particularly stingy with its online coverage of last summer’s games in Beijing, time-delaying the most popular [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post