Why Blogs Need To Be Social

Om Malik | Thursday, August 14, 2008 | 10:00 PM PT | 55 comments

Earlier this week, San Francisco-based web publishing software company Six Apart released the newest version of its flagship product, Moveable Type, and pushed the blogging community into taking the first step toward a very social future.

It is not a new concept — since their early days blogs were all about sociability. Late last year, we backed Chris Messina’s wild idea that WordPress, the open-source blogging software that we use to power majority of our network blogs, could be become the underpinning for a social network. In January, Automattic, the company behind WordPress and the free hosted blogging service WordPress.com, bought BuddyPress to help bring sociability to blogs. (Disclosure: Automattic was started by Matt Mullenweg, a close friend of mine. We share True Ventures as an investor.)

Our friends at ReadWriteWeb theorize that in order for blogging to evolve, the blogging systems need to embrace the newly popular life-streaming services such as Twitter and FriendFeed, along with a growing panoply of personal web services (including the most fabulous, Dopplr). The team at Six Apart has combined the above-mentioned ideas to create Moveable Type Pro, a blog-publishing system with extremely social DNA. (Check out the Six Apart blog for details.)

Blogging Needs To Evolve

Six Apart is making the right move, for it is time for blogging to evolve. Many of us have forgotten that blogging is not just an act of publishing but also a communal activity. It is more than leaving comments; it is about creating connections. For instance, through comments I met folks like Robert Young, who in turn wrote for the blog, and then in the process became a friend. It is time to re-embrace and extend that philosophy.

Establishing those kinds of relationships becomes an even bigger challenge as newer tools emerge, enabling new kinds of sharing. Whether it is Friendfeed or Dopplr, videos or photos, we are constantly figuring out ways to share information about us on the web. In other words, our digital life is spreading out across the web.

Blog = Digital Life Aggregator

We have two choices in order to consolidate these — either opt for all-purpose services such as Facebook (as tens of millions have done) or use our blogs as the aggregation point or hub for all these various services. Facebook, for instance allows you to share photos, aggregate your digital droppings, share comments with friends and exchange messages, but it doesn’t give you a unique identity on the web. In contrast, blogs with social features could allow you to do exactly that.

Marc Canter has been talking about this digital aggregator forever and has been ahead of the curve, though now pieces have started to fall in place. Robert Scoble is a good example of how and where things might be headed. He uses multiple services, and they are all easily consumable on his blog, where he writes longer, more engaging posts. His short conversational posts of yesteryear have migrated to FriendFeed, his video has bifurcated into long-form or live, short-form videos. I know Scoble is an outlier of this trend, but he was also ahead of the curve six years ago as far as blogging is concerned.

The Demographic Shift

As a society, we are entering an increasingly narcissistic phase, enabled by web technologies — a theory that is articulated in Wired’s recent cover story. As the Wired writer quips, “Like it or not, we are all public figures now — famous, as the new cliché goes, for 15 people.”

The evolution of blogging platforms needs to match these societal and demographic changes. I think folks who are blogging now (no, not just tech bloggers) are different from some of us early bloggers — they use different tools and services and have different views of sharing. In many ways MySpace and Facebook have changed what is OK, and what is not OK online.

With that as a sub-text, it is good to see the blogging systems start to evolve. Kudos to Six Apart for making the first major move. Suddenly, blogging tools are more fun — and social.

Open Question: How will you build the next-generation blogging system? I am going to be discussing this question with various attendees of WordCamp 2008 that is being held in San Francisco this weekend. I am speaking at the camp and have a exciting announcement as well.

PS: Get ready for BlogActionDay.org by registering your blogs, watch the new video, and become part of the movement that is about blogs making a change in our world.

25 trackbacks so far

August 14th, 2008
11:47 PM PT

[...] totally agree with Om Malik’s prognostication about blogs embracing the social, lifestreaming features of services like Dopplr, Friendfeed and [...]

August 15th, 2008
1:57 AM PT

[...] GigaOm: Why Blogs Need To Be Social [...]

August 15th, 2008
2:09 AM PT

[...] (not it’s official name, of course – I believe it is called Moveable Type Pro) – which is essentially turning the humble blog into your very own Facebook (of sorts). It brings true community tools to the blog, allowing for profiles, ratings, forums and [...]

August 15th, 2008
2:30 AM PT

[...] is the original: Why Blogs Need To Be Social - GigaOm Tagged in: about, aggregator, august, bookmarks, broadband, contact, downloads, earth2tech, [...]

August 15th, 2008
3:20 AM PT

[...] - Om Malik thinks that ” As a society, we are entering an increasingly narcissistic phase, enabled by web technologies …”, which is why blogs must become more socially interactive.  I think that I am already narcissistic enough, enabled by my brother in law’s excellent cooking.  I too seek the holy grail of enhanced interactivity … But only if it means I get to talk more. [...]

August 15th, 2008
3:25 AM PT

[...] here’s why blogs need to be [...]

August 15th, 2008
6:15 AM PT

[...] Why Blogs Need To Be Social Blogging is not just publishing, it’s a communal activity. [...]

August 15th, 2008
8:24 AM PT

[...] post on GigaOm -  "Why Blogs Need to Be Social" echoed many of our dreamfishy ideas, though it doesn’t  quite take the ideas to some [...]

August 15th, 2008
9:04 AM PT

[...] zullen groeien, vaak vanuit een bepaalde thematiek. En tegelijkertijd, zoals ook Om Malik al aangeeft, zullen er zeker ook veel individuen komen die hun eigen social network hosten (vergelijk het met [...]

August 15th, 2008
6:06 PM PT

[...] 15, 2008 Recent posts at ReadWriteWeb, at GigaOm, and elsewhere discuss the “social” direction that blogging is taking. The discussion [...]

August 15th, 2008
6:33 PM PT

[...] Why Blogs Need To Be Social - GigaOM Brilliant post from Om Malik: "The evolution of blogging platforms needs to match these societal and demographic changes. I think folks who are blogging now (no, not just tech bloggers) are different from some of us early bloggers.." (tags: blogs socialmedia) Posted by Tom Watson Filed in Links [...]

August 16th, 2008
12:05 AM PT

[...] Why blogs need to be social [GigaOM] Blog = digital life aggregator. [...]

August 16th, 2008
12:11 PM PT
August 16th, 2008
10:11 PM PT

[...] Why Blogs Need To Be Social (GigaOm) [...]

August 17th, 2008
8:45 AM PT

[...] Malik posted recently on something I’ve been thinking about a lot: namely, the tension between one-size-fits-all social networks such as Facebook and a more personalized approach using blogs and [...]

August 17th, 2008
2:32 PM PT

[...] Why Blogs Need To Be Social - GigaOM "our digital life is spreading out across the web… We have two choices in order to consolidate these — either opt for all-purpose services such as Facebook (as tens of millions have done) or use our blogs as the aggregation point or hub for all these various services." (tags: internet socialmedia socialnetworking blogging lifestreamiong aggregators tools wordpress movabletype facebook) [...]

August 17th, 2008
8:31 PM PT

[...] Some Post-Interview Thoughts: Writing contests are not new to India - Sulekha, the Oxford Bookstore, Kala Ghoda and Verve Magazine have all held writing contests. LiveJournal currently appears to be just seeding the community - not investing big, but in smaller, more focused initiatives. This will help generate discussions, and hopefully, even debate…a debate is always more charged and involving than a discussion. One should expect a number of these small initiatives, perhaps related to Music, Films, Television, Sports and Politics, to help seed communities and discussion around these. Note that LiveJournals Content+Community model will also face competition from the likes of WordPress. Do read Om Malik’s take on Why Blogs Need To Be Social. [...]

August 18th, 2008
2:00 AM PT

[...] PT Comments (0) A few days ago, I wrote about blogs needing to be more social and embracing new personal web services and acting as hubs (or aggregation points) for our increasingly digital lives. Of course, for a majority, Facebook [...]

August 18th, 2008
4:43 AM PT

[...] of these media.  This conversation is inspired by a piece last week from Om Malik titled Why Blogs Need to be Social, and a subsequent follow up from Mathew Ingram titled Let a Hundred Facebook’s Bloom.  [...]

August 18th, 2008
6:34 AM PT

[...] hacia el Social Media? ¿Por qué necesitan los blogs, y en concreto los blogs corporativos, ser más sociales? La respuesta está más en cómo han ido evolucionando los lectores, lo que obliga a tener en [...]

August 18th, 2008
8:59 AM PT

[...] zullen groeien, vaak vanuit een bepaalde thematiek. En tegelijkertijd, zoals ook Om Malik al aangeeft, zullen er zeker ook veel individuen komen die hun eigen social network hosten, vergelijkbaar met [...]

August 18th, 2008
12:57 PM PT

[...] was inspired by a piece last week on GigaOm about the evolution of blogs, titled Why Blogs Need to be Social. This morning we talked about the evolution of blogs and social networks, where they intersect, and [...]

August 19th, 2008
4:03 PM PT

[...] How will content delivery and consumption evolve?  I guess time will tell, but in the interim GigaOM continues to be a daily must-read for anyone that wants to be at the pulse of the influential, [...]

August 22nd, 2008
1:16 PM PT

[...] Does the blog get social or do we blog inside our social networks? Or both?  That is certainly the question.  each to his/her own I guess.  WordPress buying BuddyPress and SixApart expanding Moveable Type’s social features - combined with the DiSO project - is advancing the notion that the blog is #1 - and that “bringing social to software” is the next wave.  But I believe that commenting on Twitter, commenting on Facebook NewsFeeds and other new forms of expressions have expanded the blogosphere in a good way.  But ultimately - it’s gonna be different for each user. [...]

October 23rd, 2008
2:56 PM PT

[...] post on GigaOm -  “Why Blogs Need to Be Social” echoed many of our dreamfishy ideas, though it doesn’t  quite take the ideas to some interesting [...]

30 comments so far

August 15th, 2008
12:20 AM PT
Jason said:

Blogging platform should be more open, more conversational.

August 15th, 2008
12:26 AM PT
A Taylor said:

Good Post Om,

In my opinion lifecasting as a possible evolution in blogging will need to be focused on a readers interests. If one if interested in the latest news about Web 2.0 in Japan, then that person should be able to filter FriendFeed or Twitter content to find exactly that topic and not have to wade through Web 2.0 in Europe content.

Using Blogs as a lifecasting aggregation point will work as long as blog readers are able to filter and focus on content and bloggers of interest as opposed to having to wade through post after post of fluff and nonsense as we do today to find the nuggets of useful information on Twitter and on FriendFeed.

August 15th, 2008
1:41 AM PT
Pascal Rossini said:

very good post, it’s exactly this type of article that makes the blog “Gigaom” cult of the blogosphere

August 15th, 2008
2:40 AM PT
Mark Sigal said:

Excellent post, Om. I think you shine a light on some interesting ideas. Aggregating, Life Streaming and Community Building feel like foundational concepts for Web 3.0.

Somewhat related to the Facebook versus Social Blogging tools question is whether the masses ultimately want to create or consume information (in addition to practicing adornment).

Food for thought. Whereas blogging just takes a bit of discipline to keep it going, building a community is a lot of work. It’s a daily care and feeding exercise.

I blogged on this point recently from a lessons learned perspective in:

Online Community Building: Three Critical Ingredients
(link)

Check it out if interested.

Cheers,

Mark

August 15th, 2008
3:44 AM PT

It’s great to see these ideas gain prominence. We’ve been talking about this for four years, and they’re built directly into the core of Elgg, our open source social networking platform.

There are a couple of important issues that A Taylor touches on above, which boil down to audience. Not only are you going to want to filter content by overall topic (itself a hard thing to do when you’re talking about a variety of data from different facets of your life), but not everything needs to be, or should be, public. While self-publishing is interesting and exciting in the global space alone, it comes into its own when you can decide exactly who can see what, and when you can use that audience information to allow certain groups of people to interact on a deeper level.

Maybe I want to share more specific information with my partner and my family than I do with my business colleagues or Joe Random out there on the web. Similarly, why shouldn’t I be able to add people as friends across networks (particularly as social networks decentralize), or invite someone over on another network to edit a document with me, without having to create a mirror account? (And then only making it public when both people are happy with it?)

All of these ideas lead to huge possibilities, and they’re not far off. We’re certainly trying hard to build them into Elgg and the Open Data Definition, and I hope that Movable Type, BuddyPress, Marc Canter’s People Aggregator and others continue to push the boundaries with us.

August 15th, 2008
5:44 AM PT
PXLated said:

I have 100 friends that blog, does this mean I’m going to have to join 100 new social networks, fill out 100 profiles, etc? Personally, I’m not going there.

August 15th, 2008
6:01 AM PT
modelmotion said:

I am not sure any one site will ever be able to capture all the facets of the internet but this is a very important topic. I strongly believe that the power of the internet is as a collaborative platform and that the key is to have all the tools service that need rather than be slaves to the limitations of current technology.

August 15th, 2008
6:08 AM PT

I agree some blogs may benefit from lifestreaming, but I personally worry there is too much noise from twitter type streams invading too many of my information sources already. When I want to get inside smart people’s heads, nothing is better than twitter and lifestreaming. However, I don’t want it on every blog or news source I visit, causing detraction from the real content I’m seeking.

Lets harness lifestreaming where it makes sense, but maintain appropriate control. I’m not lacking for information and opinions from the masses, but I’m loosing the ability to find more valuable, well explored reporting amidst the expanding social media noise.

August 15th, 2008
7:21 AM PT

I am trying to deal with information overload thanks to all these services.

You ask a great question and I will answer it by explaining what I think I need to solve my info vs. noise problem.

I use Facebook a whole lot, way more than anything else, and my blog automatically imports into it. Now if Facebook could interface with blogging platforms and allow me to manage my blog from INSIDE Facebook, allowing me to also manage the ‘friends’ who comment and the community that has slowly formed, then that would be nice.

It would be even better if anyone would be able to comment without having to register. Just use opensocial or your facebook id (I know this is all coming).

What I need is:
- a central place to login
- manage the content I create
- connect with the community
- click a tab to see what my twitter friends are saying and tabs for the other services I sign up for

I liken it to how gmail can check all my email accounts or how IM went from walled gardens to clients that allow me to manage ALL my im accounts with different services.

Aggregation is what I need. Am I alone?

August 15th, 2008
8:23 AM PT

Great post and great comments.

Many of us feel overwhelmed by all of the methods and means we have to publish digital content and also the fragmentation that results form consolidating our digital lives in one area.

I think that taking a nod from the customization that the internet has brought us via the ability to personalize the content we wish to receive in having a much greater choice in selecting the shows we wish to watch, music we wish to hear and articles we wish to read - blogging is going to enter a new phase in which we will be able to micro-blog-cast segments of digital content (new blog posts, status updates, places/location of interest, etc.) that readers can pick and choose which areas they wish to follow. The revolution will be ‘lifestreamed’

Blogging is truly about conversations and relationships. Kudos to Six Apart’s initiative to provide bloggers with the tools to share more information and ideas.

August 15th, 2008
8:24 AM PT
John Poisson said:

I agree with Jason. Socialness means more than just silent comsumption of what our friends are saying. Conversation is paramount.

(link)

August 15th, 2008
8:32 AM PT
ronald said:

Wouldn’t the first question be. What is social or social behavior?
Is social just sharing or talking/writing with no result.
Or is social behavior sharing and influencing with a shared result/understanding?
If it’s the later, we have a long ways to go and most of these so called social nets are on the wrong track.
BTW, the noise level normally goes down if the people realize they do not have have any influence on the shared result. Except the few who have no clue, but can be easily filtered out.
To make you work more the later would also have you share your thoughts (changed or influenced) at the end of social interaction.

Or maybe, I just need more coffee.

August 15th, 2008
9:19 AM PT
Dax Brady Sheehan said:

I like what your saying Dave ^ but I think your trying to operate in the garden with the highest walls, no? And what app automatically updates your facebook account? Are you sure you still don’t have to hit update from within facebook?

We need to the walls to come down operating inside of facebook I can not imagine is the answer to that imho.

August 15th, 2008
9:24 AM PT
Todd Spraggins said:

Mash, Don’t Integrate

I think it would be a big mistake to create a monolithic entity like blogging or micro-blogging self-contained within FaceBook or visa-versa with WordPress trying to be an all out SNS. I completely agree that blogging needs to go to the next level by becoming more social - a part of the flow - and allow that personal level of connectivity as part of the dialogue.

This can and should be done by opening up the connectivity between the SNS, blogging and micro-blogging worlds. Put the control with the user and put the flexibility with the design community.

August 15th, 2008
10:31 AM PT
Shane said:

I’ve been thinking about this challenge for a while now - how to combine/integrate the various content creation channels I use into my personal website without loosing the value of the individual channels. Slapping on widgets from each site into the right column isn’t pretty.

As a father, another aspect I’m also concerned about privacy when posting about family items. I’d like the ability to easily control which content is public vs. private but still have it integrated under my personal brand (my site).

August 15th, 2008
11:58 AM PT
Jim Wheat said:

Wise words OM,

Monologue not dialogue as blogs become Wikis and copyright fades away.

August 15th, 2008
1:21 PM PT

I love reading blogs, but I’m not sure we need more aggregation.

We need more noise removal if anything! Data overflow! Ahhhh!

August 15th, 2008
1:40 PM PT

This is great stuff - everything is becoming social! It’s vital to get into the conversation - otherwise you’ll just be watching on the sidelines.

August 15th, 2008
2:36 PM PT
Blog Bloke said:

I agree most heartedly Om, but this idea is certainly nothing new. There are other blogs like mine that have been preaching this mantra for a very long time now. Maybe you should come out of the vacuum and read someone else for a change besides Scoble and the gang. :-)

Just a suggestion. Cheers!

August 16th, 2008
11:35 AM PT
Ken Kennedy said:

Well-articulated, Om. I agree with some others that there has indeed been a spreading meme here for awhile now, but this post does a great job of pulling together some old ideas and adding new emphasis (albeit indirect) on the tools and specs that are going to pull us forward like OAuth, OpenID, and DataPortability. Thanks!

August 16th, 2008
12:08 PM PT
BLOG.TV said:

Good post Om. I couldn’t agree more. Blogging must and will definitely evolve.

August 17th, 2008
8:20 AM PT

Om, there are a number of different ways to reach the objective, and I’ve been experimenting with Google sites and widgets (my own attempt to aggregate and mash-up social media).
(link)

If you’re a gypsy blogger, like me, and you have a tendency to wander from platform to platform — there’s currently no easy way to bring it all together in one place. At least, not yet.

Perhaps the one thing that most needs to transcend space and time online is an authentic reputation. I’m not so sure that we’ll ever capture that in a single application. Frankly, I’m not convinced that we really need to.

August 17th, 2008
9:54 AM PT
pyrmont said:

OM, I remember reading that post that you wrote last year about Automattic,purchasing BP, and it got me very excited about the possibilities.

I for one cannot wait to see, what Automattic, have got instore. They have been trend setters, re blogging platforms up to this point.

August 17th, 2008
4:29 PM PT
jacob mathai said:

Completely agree! A framework where disparate social “modules” can plug into is a far more flexible approach. Blogs still remain one of the major content creating mechanism on the web.

August 17th, 2008
11:57 PM PT
moneymanagement said:

Am I old fashioned??
Maybe!
I find Marc’s blog soooo difficult to read and so pointless. I guess I still like to read in continuity and not disjointed unedited statements.
Will twitter last?
I don’t think it will in its current awtaar but then what does on the social media space. I for one would not be want to be bombarded with constant feeds even after subscribing to them. Nope don’t want to know who is on the shit pot and who is having difficulty catching a cab.

August 18th, 2008
1:27 AM PT

how would I build the new blogging service ? - I think I would integrate all the comments you make on the web in the backend of the software. I think “comments” is a part of the online life that blogging hasn’t grasped ( even though it’s also a large part of blogging in itself)… =)

August 18th, 2008
1:53 PM PT

My blog automatically imports into Facebook - you can ‘Notes’ to pull in an RSS feed, no need to hit any ‘update’ button.

More importantly, what I am saying we need is interoperability and then let users CHOOSE what they want to use. I would choose to use Facebook because it has worked quite fine for me so far.

Choice never hurt anyone and just like how you can use Hotmail, Yahoo, Gmail, etc. or MSN, ICQ, AIM, etc., I just want to choose without worrying about interoperability.

August 19th, 2008
2:43 AM PT
red01 said:

Do sites that run on wordpress mu such as (link) count as a social sites.

They are kind of bridging the gap at the moment.

But I do agree with old saying evolve or die.

August 22nd, 2008
3:07 PM PT
Robert Young said:

Spot on, Om… as usual. And to support Om’s mention of how we became friends, it was indeed a *great* way to light up our friendship… something blogs, as an extension of one’s very being into the digital sphere, should facilitate with increased ease and benefit. Blogs were meant to be social!

August 23rd, 2008
7:40 AM PT
Aaron Strout said:

Om - great post! I’m starting to think about blogs the same way as I look at online communities – they are opens forms of communication that are powered by interaction among employees, customers, and more. If these communities were one way streets, then they would not be successful. What makes them successful is engagement among the members to foster better, more productive relationships with employees, customers and partners which should ultimately lead to improved business results.

While blogs started as a means to express opinions, I 100% agree that blogs are now about making connections and fostering relationships just like online communities. Connecting them with other “life streaming” apps like FF, Twitter, and Dopplr is a marvelous idea and one that I hope I see more people adopt (Scoble-style). Thanks for continuing to bring the great insights.

Best,
Aaron | @astrout

Editorial Masthead

Carolyn Pritchard
Managing Editor
Celeste LeCompte
Special Projects Editor
Om Malik
Senior Writer
Stacey Higginbotham
Staff Writer
Wagner James Au
Contributing Editor
Liz Gannes
Staff Writer
Chris Albrecht
Staff Writer
Katie Fehrenbacher
Staff Writer
Josie Garthwaite
Staff Writer
Close
E-mail It