31 Comments

Summary:

Unless you’re actively seeding torrent files or dream of one day having HD content streamed from the web to your TV, the debate over managing networks can seem hopelessly abstract. To help the rest of us understand why fast networks with a lot of capacity are […]

Unless you’re actively seeding torrent files or dream of one day having HD content streamed from the web to your TV, the debate over managing networks can seem hopelessly abstract. To help the rest of us understand why fast networks with a lot of capacity are so important, I asked networking giant Cisco for what it considers to be the top five bandwidth-hungry applications. Cisco mined the data it gathered for its visual networking index and came up with the top five in the consumer, business and mobile categories. I have chosen the following five based on how much bandwidth they use and how much speed they require in the network. While they don’t take up much capacity today because they’re not in widespread use, they are representative of what one could do with a fast network with a lot of capacity.

  1. High-Definition Telepresence: This could be Cisco’s product or another setup from a different vendor. The point is this: high-definition telepresence requires 24 Mbps and about a 50 millisecond latency to recreate the feeling of sitting in a room speaking with people. Maybe it’s a luxury, but the travel savings and potential business deals that could be struck using such systems are impressive. Companies such as Shangby, which is using standard video to sell jewelry from China, would benefit from faster bandwidth that would allow them to show their products in HD.
  2. Telemedicine and Remote Surgery: Sure, it’s the stuff of science fiction, but rural doctors have been sending medical images to doctors overseas for years. The next step is surgery done by robots or other doctors in consultation with remote physicians. Given the delicate nature of the job, this is a task that requires 10 Mbps and 1 millisecond latency for surgery.
  3. Video Instant Messaging and Video Presence: This one isn’t even close to reality and requires speeds of 10 Mbps on mobile networks (which won’t happen until we get LTE and fiber backhaul), but firms including NTT DoCoMo are working on the concept of having always-on video connectivity.
  4. High-Definition Television: Depending on compression algorithms and the network equipment, HD TV requires between 8 and 5 Mbps to deliver crisp video to consumer’s televisions.
  5. Real-Time Data Backup: This isn’t for those of us concerned about family photos — its aimed at Wall Street traders and businesses worried about interruptions to their operations and keeping their data secure. Such efforts require speeds of up to 2 Mbps and 10 milliseconds of latency, and they may become more necessary as enterprises begin to store and save data in the cloud.

Most of the big bandwidth applications are ones business and consumers pay extra for, which means that in addition to speed and network capacity, providers of such services and the recipients need to think about quality and service-level agreements as well. Arielle Sumits, manager of service provider marketing at Cisco, says she has talked with customers of Cisco equipment about metrics beyond jitter and latency to measure the actual user experience outside of the network, where software issues or other problems might interfere with a service. Those sorts of conversations will be more and more common as people consume more services from the web.

image courtesy of Cisco

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Alan Wilensky Tuesday, August 12, 2008

    We have plenty bandwidth at the peer level. We have plenty to the headend and the coloc. We even have plenty to the neighborhood – the operators are just holding out at the very edge until they can figure out how to exploit the service levels.

    For cable operators, minor investments in edge routing and possibly some CPE firmware (later replacement) can open up huge bandwidth up/down. DSL has a few challenges related to geography and physics.

    DOn’t let them kid you – they are sitting on resources of what are essentially, over provisioned plants.

  2. In the Limelight » Blog Archive » Accounting for the Four Dimensions of Delivery Tuesday, August 12, 2008

    [...] today has posted an article listing The Top 5 Bandwidth-Hungry Apps. In addition to those listed, we’d add live online [...]

  3. David H. Deans Thursday, August 14, 2008

    Stacey, a point of clarification, when you say that these high-bandwidth applications are “not in widespread use” — what you really mean is within the U.S., correct?

    Meaning, your perspective probably didn’t take into account how advanced broadband markets like Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong are significantly more evolved than the U.S. — and have supported these next-generation multimedia capabilities for several years now.

  4. Can P4P Solve Bandwidth Bloat? – GigaOM Thursday, August 21, 2008

    [...] Compressing or managing data more efficiently is becoming increasingly important as providers attempt to clamp down on large amounts of traffic while consumers and corporations demand ever more bandwidth intensive applications. [...]

  5. WAN Acceleration on the Move | Network Industry Review Wednesday, August 27, 2008

    [...] – “Why We Need Fat Pipes: The Top 5 Bandwidth-Hungry Apps” – cites these five bandwidth-hungry [...]

  6. NBT: Network Cap, una pessima idea presente e futura Sunday, August 31, 2008

    [...] il futuro, servizi che spaziano dalla telemedicina alla teleconferenza potrebbero risentire dell’effetto dei cap. Per non parlare di chi, con il Web, ci [...]

  7. Two Ways to Get Comcast to Ditch the Data Cap – GigaOM Wednesday, September 24, 2008

    [...] defined the term. So keep your complaints flowing, play our 250GB challenge and get grandma an HD video conferencing service so average users start boosting their data [...]

  8. Why Network Virtualization Is Important | Telecom Update Tuesday, February 3, 2009

    [...] Whether it comes via Google or some social network startup, online data is exploding, and it’s putting new kinds of stress on our infrastructure. The economic mess we’re in means the infrastructure gets stressed even more, as companies and consumers alike turn to the web in an effort to squeeze additional efficiencies out of the system and save a few pennies. Such infrastructure is already under pressure as the demand for online video explodes — another phenomenon that that shows no sign of letting up anytime soon. (Related post: Why We Need Fat Pipes: The Top 5 Bandwidth-hungry Apps.) [...]

  9. Broadband: Damned Lies Edition Monday, February 23, 2009

    [...] or Verizon is investing $23 billion in next generation networks, it’s more valuable to look ahead at what people need to be able to do with broadband networks — items such as telepresence, streaming media or ubiquitous access to high speed connections [...]

  10. ¿Para qué sirven los 100 megas? « Blog CMT Thursday, February 26, 2009

    [...] La TV en Alta Definición necesita unos anchos de banda de 5 a 8 megas según un artículo de Gigaom. El Digital Video Recorder se ofrece, pero todavía es una opción que requiere pagar una tarifa [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post