<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ev Williams: Twitter Not Limiting Followers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:18:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mehul Mike Patel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mehul Mike Patel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The biggest problem and Bug Twitter currently has are:

1) Hundreds of Thousands of Twitter members  who are unable to follow even those who are following them and are well under limit and ratio

2) Thousands of Twitter members suspended without any fault of there&#039;s OR due to some stupid Third party untrusted app they signed up for.

This is becoming the biggest problem on Twitter worldwide!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest problem and Bug Twitter currently has are:</p>
<p>1) Hundreds of Thousands of Twitter members  who are unable to follow even those who are following them and are well under limit and ratio</p>
<p>2) Thousands of Twitter members suspended without any fault of there&#8217;s OR due to some stupid Third party untrusted app they signed up for.</p>
<p>This is becoming the biggest problem on Twitter worldwide!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Beasley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Beasley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TwitterOnTheRun is an automated self-sustaining TWITTER program that follows Tweeters who are interested in what you are interested in on TWITTER. You tell the program which Tweeters are already talking about what you are about, and it follows for you just like the specified Tweeter follows. When you follow Tweeters who have common interests with you on TWITTER, they are highly likely to follow you back. Then you can get your message out to all of them with one simple tweet or more tweets, if you choose!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TwitterOnTheRun is an automated self-sustaining TWITTER program that follows Tweeters who are interested in what you are interested in on TWITTER. You tell the program which Tweeters are already talking about what you are about, and it follows for you just like the specified Tweeter follows. When you follow Tweeters who have common interests with you on TWITTER, they are highly likely to follow you back. Then you can get your message out to all of them with one simple tweet or more tweets, if you choose!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mehul Mike Patel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mehul Mike Patel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think 2000 is fair enough, if you are really going to chk the updates and let them chk your updates, I mean really, think abt it!

However in a true Social Media / New Media world we don&#039;t need limits but all said and done 2000 is preety decent figure!

That&#039;s me on Twitter see you guys:

http://twitter.com/KIPL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think 2000 is fair enough, if you are really going to chk the updates and let them chk your updates, I mean really, think abt it!</p>
<p>However in a true Social Media / New Media world we don&#8217;t need limits but all said and done 2000 is preety decent figure!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s me on Twitter see you guys:</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/KIPL" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/KIPL</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeremy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 03:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just touch the 2000 followers limit today and it seems no additional followers can be add. It just stop there. sigh..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just touch the 2000 followers limit today and it seems no additional followers can be add. It just stop there. sigh..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Twitter Following 1000 per day Limit</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Twitter Following 1000 per day Limit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] OM - Ev Williams: Twitter Not Limiting Followers [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OM &#8211; Ev Williams: Twitter Not Limiting Followers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Chappell</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Chappell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I disagree entirely with Twitter’s restrictions on how many people I’m allowed to follow as stated in my online essay http://arthurchappell.me.uk/twitter.limitations.htm  MY TWITTER PAGE - http://twitter.com/arthurchappell]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree entirely with Twitter’s restrictions on how many people I’m allowed to follow as stated in my online essay <a href="http://arthurchappell.me.uk/twitter.limitations.htm" rel="nofollow">http://arthurchappell.me.uk/twitter.limitations.htm</a>  MY TWITTER PAGE &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/arthurchappell" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/arthurchappell</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Bordeaux</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad Bordeaux]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think there needs to be a free component so that EVERYONE will want to use it.  Otherwise, a lot of people will opt out all together.  Perhaps 500 following limit or something for a free account.  Possibly even limit the # of followers for a free account.  Once people sign up for free, they will see the value in paying $5 to $10 per month to expand their account.  This will certainly end the SPAM issue.  Not many spammers are going to cough up real cash only to have their accounts deleted when they start spamming.

The idea that it should be totally free is beyond my thought process.  We have been given a luxury from the folks at Twitter for far too long.  At some point, they have to make some money from something.  It isn&#039;t fair to them to expect that they are going to keep this great service up and running for free forever.    Whether the money they receive is in the form of subscriber fees or advertising - they have to be compensated eventually.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there needs to be a free component so that EVERYONE will want to use it.  Otherwise, a lot of people will opt out all together.  Perhaps 500 following limit or something for a free account.  Possibly even limit the # of followers for a free account.  Once people sign up for free, they will see the value in paying $5 to $10 per month to expand their account.  This will certainly end the SPAM issue.  Not many spammers are going to cough up real cash only to have their accounts deleted when they start spamming.</p>
<p>The idea that it should be totally free is beyond my thought process.  We have been given a luxury from the folks at Twitter for far too long.  At some point, they have to make some money from something.  It isn&#8217;t fair to them to expect that they are going to keep this great service up and running for free forever.    Whether the money they receive is in the form of subscriber fees or advertising &#8211; they have to be compensated eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linnet Woods</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linnet Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is nothing wrong with limiting follows unmatched by followers after, say, the first 100 or 200 to let new members follow enough people to have an opportunity to get followed back by enough people to build a social group upon.

I have said it elsewhere and I will say it again - all this talk of $10 per month or so many $s per number of follows is a nonsense! Most people would simply abandon Twitter and walk away, leaving just commercial entities who wouldn&#039;t see any point in paying to be where the public aren&#039;t! At $1 per month or $10 per year in advance to be a membe, most of us could and would afford it and pay willingly, regardless of numbers in our follower/folllowing groups.This represents an enormous amount of money across the Twitter population. If Twitter wanted to charge commercial clients an additional amount and give them some extra goodies, so be it, but imposing advertising on people&#039;s pages without their say-so would be a good way to empty twitter of a significant number of people, I think.

I would have paid $1 a month or $10 for a year (say after a free 30-day trial) of Twitter with great pleasure, even though there were very few people following me at that point. Why do people always talk about charging the sort of money that people have to think twice about instead of asking for a negligible fee on the basis that sheer numbers will make that a very desirable income for the website owners without putting off potential clients?

Business people need to learn how to think like non-business people if they are ever to figure out how to get their custom! That&#039;s my 2 cents-worth (if it&#039;s even worth that much! LOL) and thanks for a thought-provoking article :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing wrong with limiting follows unmatched by followers after, say, the first 100 or 200 to let new members follow enough people to have an opportunity to get followed back by enough people to build a social group upon.</p>
<p>I have said it elsewhere and I will say it again &#8211; all this talk of $10 per month or so many $s per number of follows is a nonsense! Most people would simply abandon Twitter and walk away, leaving just commercial entities who wouldn&#8217;t see any point in paying to be where the public aren&#8217;t! At $1 per month or $10 per year in advance to be a membe, most of us could and would afford it and pay willingly, regardless of numbers in our follower/folllowing groups.This represents an enormous amount of money across the Twitter population. If Twitter wanted to charge commercial clients an additional amount and give them some extra goodies, so be it, but imposing advertising on people&#8217;s pages without their say-so would be a good way to empty twitter of a significant number of people, I think.</p>
<p>I would have paid $1 a month or $10 for a year (say after a free 30-day trial) of Twitter with great pleasure, even though there were very few people following me at that point. Why do people always talk about charging the sort of money that people have to think twice about instead of asking for a negligible fee on the basis that sheer numbers will make that a very desirable income for the website owners without putting off potential clients?</p>
<p>Business people need to learn how to think like non-business people if they are ever to figure out how to get their custom! That&#8217;s my 2 cents-worth (if it&#8217;s even worth that much! LOL) and thanks for a thought-provoking article :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristr</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143649</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am also stuck at 2K follow limits, What’s the rule ? Can’t we follow more? Please Help!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also stuck at 2K follow limits, What’s the rule ? Can’t we follow more? Please Help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Castillo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Castillo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/08/11/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000/#comment-143648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want an Internet without limits!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want an Internet without limits!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
