<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wireless Results Scorecard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tough Times Ahead for U.S. Phone Companies? - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-893237</link>
		<dc:creator>Tough Times Ahead for U.S. Phone Companies? - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-893237</guid>
		<description>[...] is making people pick a wireless-only option &#8212; a theory supported by robust growth in the wireless additions at Verizon (1.5 million net new subscribers) and AT&#38;T Wireless (1.3 million net new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is making people pick a wireless-only option &#8212; a theory supported by robust growth in the wireless additions at Verizon (1.5 million net new subscribers) and AT&amp;T Wireless (1.3 million net new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q2 Mobile Provider results&#8230; Huh?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-892791</link>
		<dc:creator>Q2 Mobile Provider results&#8230; Huh?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-892791</guid>
		<description>[...] was just reading one of my favorite blogs GigaOM and Stacey Higginbotham compiled the jist of the Q2 US mobile provider results. I find it very interesting that it seems like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was just reading one of my favorite blogs GigaOM and Stacey Higginbotham compiled the jist of the Q2 US mobile provider results. I find it very interesting that it seems like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinnie mirchandani</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-892749</link>
		<dc:creator>vinnie mirchandani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-892749</guid>
		<description>Stacey I did not divide by 3 for the quarter - duh! thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacey I did not divide by 3 for the quarter - duh! thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-892725</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-892725</guid>
		<description>T-Mobile's data ARPU is driven mostly by SMS and MMS revenues and plans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T-Mobile&#8217;s data ARPU is driven mostly by SMS and MMS revenues and plans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techboy2000</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-892577</link>
		<dc:creator>Techboy2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-892577</guid>
		<description>T-Mobile's ARPU does not seem to make sense.  T-Mobile has the worst data network of the big 4.  I would expect AT&#38;T to have a much larger ARPU than T-Mobile because of the superior 3G network and the more sophisticated data related services/apps that AT&#38;T offers.
Anyhow, love the quick summaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T-Mobile&#8217;s ARPU does not seem to make sense.  T-Mobile has the worst data network of the big 4.  I would expect AT&amp;T to have a much larger ARPU than T-Mobile because of the superior 3G network and the more sophisticated data related services/apps that AT&amp;T offers.<br />
Anyhow, love the quick summaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-892566</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-892566</guid>
		<description>Vinnie, here's the AT&#038;T presentation and the data is on page 4: http://www.att.com/Investor/Financial/Earning_Info/docs/2Q_08_IB_FINAL.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vinnie, here&#8217;s the AT&#038;T presentation and the data is on page 4:  (<a href="http://www.att.com/Investor/Financial/Earning_Info/docs/2Q_08_IB_FINAL.pdf" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-892565</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-892565</guid>
		<description>vinnie, I pulled that number from the AT&#038;T Q2 investor presentation. It refers to the blended wireless ARPU based only on services revenue. My AT&#038;T revenue number includes non-services revenue. The services revenue totaled $11B, and since the ARPU reflect monthly usage, you dived the revenue by the subscriber base and then divide that by three to reflect the months in the quarter. I'm still 30 cents off AT&#038;T's ARPU number, but that's probably a result of differing ARPU for postpaid and prepaid accounts that should be averaged out. 

Hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vinnie, I pulled that number from the AT&#038;T Q2 investor presentation. It refers to the blended wireless ARPU based only on services revenue. My AT&#038;T revenue number includes non-services revenue. The services revenue totaled $11B, and since the ARPU reflect monthly usage, you dived the revenue by the subscriber base and then divide that by three to reflect the months in the quarter. I&#8217;m still 30 cents off AT&#038;T&#8217;s ARPU number, but that&#8217;s probably a result of differing ARPU for postpaid and prepaid accounts that should be averaged out. </p>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinnie mirchandani</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-892545</link>
		<dc:creator>vinnie mirchandani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-892545</guid>
		<description>Stacey, something you can clarify ...does ARPU include land line subscribers? ...if you divide ATT mobile revs by mobile subscribers ARPU is closer to $ 165 - even those on family plan pay 9.99 a month or 120 a year...am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacey, something you can clarify &#8230;does ARPU include land line subscribers? &#8230;if you divide ATT mobile revs by mobile subscribers ARPU is closer to $ 165 - even those on family plan pay 9.99 a month or 120 a year&#8230;am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-892538</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-892538</guid>
		<description>Dawson, thanks for the eagle eyes. We've fixed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dawson, thanks for the eagle eyes. We&#8217;ve fixed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawson Hunter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-892531</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawson Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-892531</guid>
		<description>Verizon's Q2 revenue was 12.1 BILLION... not million.  I was real confused until I checked that one out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verizon&#8217;s Q2 revenue was 12.1 BILLION&#8230; not million.  I was real confused until I checked that one out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
