<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wireless Results Scorecard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:54:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tough Times Ahead for U.S. Phone Companies? - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-893237</link>
		<dc:creator>Tough Times Ahead for U.S. Phone Companies? - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-893237</guid>
		<description>[...] is making people pick a wireless-only option &#8212; a theory supported by robust growth in the wireless additions at Verizon (1.5 million net new subscribers) and AT&amp;T Wireless (1.3 million net new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is making people pick a wireless-only option &#8212; a theory supported by robust growth in the wireless additions at Verizon (1.5 million net new subscribers) and AT&amp;T Wireless (1.3 million net new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q2 Mobile Provider results&#8230; Huh?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-892791</link>
		<dc:creator>Q2 Mobile Provider results&#8230; Huh?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-892791</guid>
		<description>[...] was just reading one of my favorite blogs GigaOM and Stacey Higginbotham compiled the jist of the Q2 US mobile provider results. I find it very interesting that it seems like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was just reading one of my favorite blogs GigaOM and Stacey Higginbotham compiled the jist of the Q2 US mobile provider results. I find it very interesting that it seems like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinnie mirchandani</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-892749</link>
		<dc:creator>vinnie mirchandani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-892749</guid>
		<description>Stacey I did not divide by 3 for the quarter - duh! thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacey I did not divide by 3 for the quarter &#8211; duh! thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-892725</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-892725</guid>
		<description>T-Mobile&#039;s data ARPU is driven mostly by SMS and MMS revenues and plans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T-Mobile&#8217;s data ARPU is driven mostly by SMS and MMS revenues and plans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techboy2000</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-892577</link>
		<dc:creator>Techboy2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-892577</guid>
		<description>T-Mobile&#039;s ARPU does not seem to make sense.  T-Mobile has the worst data network of the big 4.  I would expect AT&amp;T to have a much larger ARPU than T-Mobile because of the superior 3G network and the more sophisticated data related services/apps that AT&amp;T offers.
Anyhow, love the quick summaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T-Mobile&#8217;s ARPU does not seem to make sense.  T-Mobile has the worst data network of the big 4.  I would expect AT&amp;T to have a much larger ARPU than T-Mobile because of the superior 3G network and the more sophisticated data related services/apps that AT&amp;T offers.<br />
Anyhow, love the quick summaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-892566</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-892566</guid>
		<description>Vinnie, here&#039;s the AT&amp;T presentation and the data is on page 4: http://www.att.com/Investor/Financial/Earning_Info/docs/2Q_08_IB_FINAL.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vinnie, here&#8217;s the AT&#038;T presentation and the data is on page 4: <a href="http://www.att.com/Investor/Financial/Earning_Info/docs/2Q_08_IB_FINAL.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.att.com/Investor/Financial/Earning_Info/docs/2Q_08_IB_FINAL.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-892565</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-892565</guid>
		<description>vinnie, I pulled that number from the AT&amp;T Q2 investor presentation. It refers to the blended wireless ARPU based only on services revenue. My AT&amp;T revenue number includes non-services revenue. The services revenue totaled $11B, and since the ARPU reflect monthly usage, you dived the revenue by the subscriber base and then divide that by three to reflect the months in the quarter. I&#039;m still 30 cents off AT&amp;T&#039;s ARPU number, but that&#039;s probably a result of differing ARPU for postpaid and prepaid accounts that should be averaged out. 

Hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vinnie, I pulled that number from the AT&#038;T Q2 investor presentation. It refers to the blended wireless ARPU based only on services revenue. My AT&#038;T revenue number includes non-services revenue. The services revenue totaled $11B, and since the ARPU reflect monthly usage, you dived the revenue by the subscriber base and then divide that by three to reflect the months in the quarter. I&#8217;m still 30 cents off AT&#038;T&#8217;s ARPU number, but that&#8217;s probably a result of differing ARPU for postpaid and prepaid accounts that should be averaged out. </p>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinnie mirchandani</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-892545</link>
		<dc:creator>vinnie mirchandani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-892545</guid>
		<description>Stacey, something you can clarify ...does ARPU include land line subscribers? ...if you divide ATT mobile revs by mobile subscribers ARPU is closer to $ 165 - even those on family plan pay 9.99 a month or 120 a year...am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacey, something you can clarify &#8230;does ARPU include land line subscribers? &#8230;if you divide ATT mobile revs by mobile subscribers ARPU is closer to $ 165 &#8211; even those on family plan pay 9.99 a month or 120 a year&#8230;am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-892538</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-892538</guid>
		<description>Dawson, thanks for the eagle eyes. We&#039;ve fixed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dawson, thanks for the eagle eyes. We&#8217;ve fixed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawson Hunter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/wireless-results-scorecard/#comment-892531</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawson Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16850#comment-892531</guid>
		<description>Verizon&#039;s Q2 revenue was 12.1 BILLION... not million.  I was real confused until I checked that one out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verizon&#8217;s Q2 revenue was 12.1 BILLION&#8230; not million.  I was real confused until I checked that one out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
