Comments on: First Look: Mozilla Snowl http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/first-look-mozilla-snowl/ Sat, 18 May 2013 16:03:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Money Ideas http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/first-look-mozilla-snowl/#comment-75095 Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:32:08 +0000 http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3202#comment-75095 Yeah, but you will have to agree that most of Mozilla products are very good.
I guess we’ll have to wait a few months to see the results.

]]> By: eterps http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/first-look-mozilla-snowl/#comment-75094 Sat, 09 Aug 2008 16:24:21 +0000 http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3202#comment-75094 Looks like Mozilla might be trying to take a page from M$ and their unified communications platform – IM, VoiP, Email and Calendars all talking to each other and sharing data. An open source version of this tech will be insanely useful.

Imagine getting an email from someone important amidst 300 other messages – Then having that message shot to the top of your queue because Snowl (or whatever) knows you’ve had 2 voip conversations, a couple IM conversations, and that you’ve posted to a facebook profile. Then having all these records one click away so you can review them before responding to the email.

Can’t wait.

]]> By: Svetlana Gladkova http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/first-look-mozilla-snowl/#comment-75093 Sat, 09 Aug 2008 04:11:15 +0000 http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3202#comment-75093 From what I’ve seen the initial prototype does not even support all the text-based messaging protocols – Twitter and RSS definitely is not everything. I’m not sure if anyone will be able to come up with a solution to sort out all the mess that we face daily with all our messages but Snowl does not seem to even promise it – I think the major idea is simply to move messaging from everywhere we have it and into a browser. But what’s the difference if I still need to switch between tabs?

]]> By: Champ http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/first-look-mozilla-snowl/#comment-75092 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:25:08 +0000 http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3202#comment-75092 O’rly?

]]>