50 Comments

Summary:

Although the types of tech writing that I do require me to spend the majority of my  time on Windows PCs (and some on Linux systems), I also use a MacBook, and have accumulated a list of Windows-vs.-Mac gripes over the years. I know that a […]

Although the types of tech writing that I do require me to spend the majority of my  time on Windows PCs (and some on Linux systems), I also use a MacBook, and have accumulated a list of Windows-vs.-Mac gripes over the years. I know that a lot of readers of this blog use Macs, but quite a few use Windows machines, too. If you’re considering switching to the Mac–and more people are than ever–here is my top five list of advantages the Mac offers.



An actual file system.
Microsoft has been promising a fast, full-featured file system in Windows for years without ever delivering one. WinFS, which was supposed to be a Mac-like, robust file system was planned for Windows Vista, but then shelved. The speed with which I can retrieve anything on my computer with the Mac is a huge advantage.

Much better video and graphics. The Mac OS and Mac machines have been recognized for years as trouncing Windows PCs in these areas, but I don’t see this as just a hardware or operating system issue anymore. That’s especially true now that Apple uses Intel processors. It’s the applications I can use on the Mac that have become more robust than their Windows counterparts. Even iMovie is more robust than Windows video editing applications that cost hundreds of dollars.

Cooler looking machines. Hey, it had to be said. Apple dominates at design. The Mac OS also looks slicker than Windows XP or Windows Vista.

True plug-and-play. Mac users, when was the last time you tried to plug any peripheral in and ran into problems? Even after years of Microsoft’s plug-and-play initiatives, I still run into nasty driver issues and incompatibilities. I think the key here is that Apple keeps compatibility simpler for developers and hardware manufacturers.

More reliability. Macs are more reliable than PCs for several reasons. The operating system is far less prone to crashing. Support is head-and-shoulders above what you get with a PC. And because the user base is smaller than Windows’, Macs and Mac applications are less of a target for hackers.

Mac users, what would you add to this list?

  1. “Support is head-and-shoulders above what you get with a PC”
    Maybe for those first three months, but three months? Come on

    Share
  2. Totally agree with the first four, but not with the last one.

    My XP hasn’t crashed a single time in three years of daily use, weekends included, and when I’ve had a problem I’ve always found a solution quite quickly thanks to internet (not microsoft) and the larger user base.

    I’d like to have a Mac also… (and a good digital camera, a good espresso machine, an old beetle, ….)

    Share
  3. Visited a mac store the other day and saw the air,cool pc mac case,ipods,and more.
    Just like to say Steve Job got it right the first time.
    microsoft user since inception of computers
    and after many H.D. crashes,trojans,anti spyware,and the blue screen of death, i may just buy a mac.
    Maybe just maybe… still undecided,xp has many issues,but it kinda grew on me and like a lost child I really can’t abandon it,it needs nurturing and tlc that I’m more than willing to provide.
    Hate & love relationship with my xp goes on.

    Share
  4. 1. HFS+ is not that great. Don’t believe me? Ask Linus Torvalds
    http://blogs.zdnet.com/Apple/?p=1278

    4. Plug and Play? Great, if you can find a Mac peripheral. And you still have to install drivers.

    5. Reliability? I find XP very good with reliability, and Vista has been outstanding.

    Share
  5. #4 Unless Apple comes out with a new operating system. Then you need to upgrade your IPOD since its no longer compatible.

    Share
  6. I use Macs some of the time but my choice is PC’s I love my lenovo laptop. same hi rez screen, fast, crashes once in a while when I tax it with PS CS3, dreamweaver, word, outlook and internet explorer is all open at once. So really what’s the big deal? Many windows computers are ugly but not all. Soem are quite beautiful, right up ther w/ mac books etc. Main question… if macs are so great why only 10 or so percent of the market? nobody is twistinga anybody’s are here? It’s liek saying “my wife is better than your wife” It’s just dumb and irrelevant. or you could say perhaps “lets trade for a few days and I’ll let you know” ;-)

    Share
  7. Those awesome Apple stickers?

    How about those Windows Updates that take a good 20 minutes?

    Share
  8. Oh, and you forgot. More expensive.
    I can have those and better things with Linux oh, and also save money.

    Share
  9. “True plug-and-play. Mac users, when was the last time you tried to plug any peripheral in and ran into problems? Even after years of Microsoft’s plug-and-play initiatives, I still run into nasty driver issues and incompatibilities. I think the key here is that Apple keeps compatibility simpler for developers and hardware manufacturers.”

    As long as its from Apple. Then again, I’ve never had a problem with a Microsoft product working in Windows either.

    That said, we have both Macs and PCs in my shop, and the best experience I’ve had yet from a computer was running Ubuntu. All the flexibility, half the price.

    Share
  10. Ease of software installation. “Drag the little icon to the applications folder.” Done. I know, that’s not always the case, but even apps with installers are far simpler to install than any Windows App.

    Share
  11. # Typography is sharp and clean. Easy on the eyes, you can work longer without eye strain.
    # Built-in UNIX system.
    # Multi-monitor support that just works.
    # Startup and shutdown in mere seconds.

    Share
  12. “Plug and Play? Great, if you can find a Mac peripheral. And you still have to install drivers.” – Not Quite

    Bzzt. You’re still stuck in 1995. How many peripherals out there don’t work with Macs these days? Not many. And many work right out of the box, no driver installation necessary.

    Here’s a big reason you missed: no spyware, no viruses. I browse and download with complete peace of mind. I can’t tell you how much time I’ve spent cleaning spyware off friends’ and relatives’ Windows PCs. Fortunately for me, many of them have switched to Mac.

    I use Windows 40+ hours a week at the office. Have done for 15+ years. I know Windows well. And at the end of the day, I can’t wait to come home to my Mac.

    Share
  13. Comparing the Mac platform to Windows OS is not a fair comparison. I’m no fan of Windows, but give credit where it’s due. Windows has to deal with a ridiculous number of hardware combinations, whereas Mac has what has been approved for the OS. Of course OSX compatible with all the OSX-approved hardware, because it only has to be compatible with a limited amount of hardware.

    And beyond that, linux has the best driver compatibility out there. The only reason you’ll find something that doesn’t work is if the vendor doesn’t open their drivers. Of the three Linux is the most stable. Case and point, a stick of my RAM died, Windows would explode within a few minutes of being up, whereas Linux ran without a hiccup.

    OSX is a really nice GUI over a POSIX OS. Being a Windows/Arch Linux user, sometimes I get that urge to switch, but what stops me is the lack of customization inherit in the OSX platform. The fact that I can’t remap Capslock to escape and that I have to get a third-party utility to accelerate the mouse-curve to faster than “handicapped-child” are deal-breakers.

    Share
  14. I dare say you can “prove” anything if you pick your factors right and you decide the answers.

    People have different needs. For me it’s the programs and tools on the platform. For others it’ ll be different.

    Take a thousand people (who bother to think) get a thousand different ways to decide.

    Share
  15. Robert “one time in three years”. Come on, mand. Are you kidding us ? I’ve 21 years of computer experience. I know microsoft and actually i’ve macbook pro. No color. it’s perfect. i use vmware fusion for windows xp. In xp i ve problems with printer in vmware desktop. In fusion runs. Incredible. And the sleep mode ? open close, open close and no problems.

    Expensive ? When i was looking for a new laptopt, windows with the same features had a bigger price.

    Share
  16. I used to work for Microsoft (5 years) and today proudly own two Macs and a PC, so I have a leg in both ‘camps’. To me there are two fundamental issues here that play to Microsofts disadvantage:

    First of all Microsoft never managed to persuade its hardware partners that design mattered. Perhaps Microsoft didn’t want to. After all Microsoft is most interested in the enterprise market, and here design is perhaps not so important.

    The second part is the compatibility. Try and design an OS that has near world domination and has to work one way or the other with everything millions of external hardware and software producers could think of throwing at it. No wonder that Windows sometimes crashes and need constant updating.

    Speaking of updating this is the number one reason for me to have Macs today: No constant security updates…

    Share
  17. I switched last month after a lifetime of using Windows. I now dread using XP/Vista at work. Reasons:

    The Vista UI just looks like a gradient mess with all its ugly transparencies. And XP still looks like a pastel drawing.

    I plugged 4Gb of RAM into my MacBook Pro without having to worry if the OS could handle it. 64-bit Vista is getting better, but XP was a joke for driver support.

    The software. Just take a look at the apps developed for each platform. Sure they all accomplish the same job but Mac ones feel as if they’ve actually being designed for human use. And with the Cocoa frameworks they can tie in to some advanced functionality with minimal code.

    The one downside I would say is lack of overall keyboard support. When I’m working I’ll very rarely touch the mouse and while I can get along alright on the Mac it just doesn’t have all the keyboard shortcuts other systems have.

    And I still use Linux for all my server needs purely for its overall stability and modular nature.

    Share
  18. Please get over the whole Apple thing. It’s so 1985. I’ve used a MacBook for a month as a main machine, here’s my gripes on the whole Apple pc, OS, hardware combination:

    Why is there no del button? Is this some sort of userfriendly design thing?

    They look so cool, just too bad all my colleagues had the same machine. Feels kind of communist.

    GO and google freeware and software for the PC, a bonanza. For the Mac?

    Pages was installed on the machine as wordprocessor. I found after working on a projectplan for two hours that it doesn’t have an autosave feature.

    Guess how I found out? The program crashed.

    I wanted a mouse, guess how many choices I had and guess the price of the thing.

    What’s wrong with right and left clicking? It’s not available on the pad of the MacBook.

    I do a lot of text editing, in Windows all programs are opened with the title of the document. You see them in the Taskbar. What do I have in OSX in the dock? Icons, ehh.. yes but I need to have the text because I have multiple text documents open.

    Then searching and finding of documents is a pain. I actually know where I put my documents so I prefer explorer type programs to find, search and save documents and files. With OSX which is great for searching I felt cutoff from the “physical” and association aspect I have with my files.

    Then the price of the whole thing. I’m glad my company paid for the thing, because I would never dish out that kind of money for a pc. I could buy a regular laptop, an asus eee pc and a high performance graphical laptop all together for the same amount.

    Yes Apple does offer some great things, but I am thankful that I have returned to Windows. Not because it’s so great, but it actually does the best job for me with what it offers and that is what is most important to me.

    Share
  19. Well, it’s a strange thing to see LifeHacker ignite such an endless FlameWare.
    I use Windows @work and veryday I’m very very pleased to get back home to my Macs. But well, your mileage may vary.
    @Brendan : I’ve always found the offer for free or cheap software better on Mac OS X than on Windows. Of course, there may be a lot more on Windows, but not so many are free and quality frequently sucks. As for mouse, over the years, I’ve used devices from Microsoft and Logitech… exactly the same ones as I would have bought for a PC, and for the same price. I don’t see your point here. Many peripherals work out of the box on a Mac, even if it’s not certified by the vendor.

    Share
  20. (well, I meant WebWorkerDaily, not LifeHacker,sorry for it. I’m still surprised though :))

    Share
  21. I am a converted mac user for some months now.
    I’ve been using Linux and or Windows all my life and the switch made a difference.

    What I would add to the list is that OSX has general better user experience. Apps look way cooler and more esthetically pleasing and the system in some way inspires you to do something creative.

    Share
  22. I converted to a mac in February and it’s been an amazing experience. As a developer I have found that my productivity has increased by switching to the mac. But where I am really happy is the ability to manage my family photos and videos. The software included with OS X is simple and fast.

    Share
  23. The 1# reason not to switch to a Mac is that we won’t go around writing articles and telling other people why they are dumb for using a PC and should switch to Macs. Mac users are like Jehovah’s witnesses with their preaching.

    Share
  24. @Guillaume
    Yes exactly Logitech and Mac. Mmm… there are more brands and types of mouse. Furthermore concerning the software, are you serious? What software quality thing? This depends strongly on what you’re looking for and what type of user you are. For some Apple is an improvement. Maybe I was also disappointed, because some people tout Apple so much that expectations become too high. It’s just a tool for me and I see the advantages and disadvantages of a Linux, Windows and an Apple. I’m far from a Windows fan, but I’m used to a lot of stuff on it. My mother lately bought the Asus eee PC which also on offer here now with mobile broadband internet. For every person there is a certain type of pc and OS. I think that is a more important question than getting a Mac which I get the feeling is often more of a status thing than a real informed decision.

    Share
  25. Ahhh these posts bring out the best in us! As a lifetime PC user who just switched to Mac, I can say that I’m impressed. Hosted apps have made the switch a non-issue since I have no legacy software concerns.

    I guess I’m easy to impress…since it pleases me to see the darn thing when I walk in the office and the keyboard is fantastic. Is that bad?

    Share
  26. @Brendan: what do you mean Windows has more free software?!

    Because of the BSD (Unix) core, you can run just about anything in the (F)OSS world.

    Coupled with X11, you can do far more than a Windows user could ever dream.

    Share
  27. Ridiculous article. I am a Mac user and a Windows user. The Mac is great. Vista is also great. They both have their uses.

    #2: “It’s the applications I can use on the Mac that have become more robust than their Windows counterparts. Even iMovie is more robust than Windows video editing applications that cost hundreds of dollars.”

    Really? Is that why Photoshop is faster on Windows? Is that why the next version of Photoshop won’t even be available for the Mac? Because the graphics are better on the Mac?

    And what criteria are you using to judge iMovie being more robust than Windows video editing apps? I’ve used Premiere Elements for several years and its a wonderful application.

    #4: I think the key here is that Apple keeps compatibility simpler for developers and hardware manufacturers.

    Well yeah that does a lot for making things more stable and robust doesn’t it? When you control the hardware? Microsoft doesn’t have that luxury.

    Share
  28. Another useful resource for commentary about switching:

    http://switchtoamac.com

    Share
  29. I hate to get involved in a holy war here. I’m not going to argue any inherent superiority of Macs over PCs. That said, I think this piece missed the three biggest advantages held by the Mac:

    Ability to run Windows as well as Mac OS. As a web worker, I need to be able to test that everything appears and works properly on several browsers. With a Mac, I can test on Safari, as well as boot into Windows (or run a virtualized install) to test on IE. I can even have multiple instances of Windows, allowing me to test on both IE6 and IE7 since Microsoft doesn’t think I should have both on one machine. This is huge.

    Off-the-shelf security. It doesn’t matter whether it’s because the Mac OS is inherently more secure, or if because no one bothers to write malicious code to attack them. The fact is, I don’t need to install and run any third-party antivirus tools, spyware eliminators or any of that crap. It just works.

    It’s Unix. I like that the Mac has a stable core underneath the hood. It makes it easy to install and run mySQL/PHP/Apache so that my local machine can serve as an ad-hoc development box before I commit changes to a Web server. Of course, if your live Web site is hosted by IIS, the web stuff is moot.

    Again… these are just some Mac advantages. PCs have their advantages as well. But if you’re a web worker pondering a switch, I think these are some key strengths to consider.

    Share
  30. @Jason Kratz: Photoshop was written to run on older OS like OS9. Apple came up with Carbon to allow old apps to run on OSX. Photoshop needs to be re-written in Cocoa to take advantage of OSX and 64 bit processing. That is why Photoshop runs faster on Windows and won’t be ready for OSX. Adobe has to start from scratch and it will be expensive. Now that Macs are selling in higher volumes and more and more companies are switching, I think Adobe will make the effort to adapt.

    Share
  31. Almost all of the gripes about Macs are hackneyed. People, please wake up and smell the Rose (Macintosh)! I use both Macs and PCs every day. I breathe a sigh of relief when I move to the Mac after 8 hours of Microsoft Piece of Crap (PC)!!!

    Share
  32. Jason Kratz says “Really? Is that why Photoshop is faster on Windows? Is that why the next version of Photoshop won’t even be available for the Mac? Because the graphics are better on the Mac?”

    Um, no. CS4 will be released as 64 bit for Vista 64. It will be 32 bit for Vista 32 and Mac. CS5 will be 64 bit for Mac. This is because Adobe has to rewrite the CS suite in Cocoa. Adobe has been taking the easy route with Mac development, staying with the Carbon environment, even when Apple said go to Cocoa. Apple canned the Carbon 64 environment last year to force developers (like Adobe) to rewrite their apps in Cocoa.

    Share
  33. @Michael Thompson
    Yoohoo, I’m a “normal” user. Application wise for Windows there is much more out there. Just test it out. Google apple freeware or mac freeware and compare that to windows freeware. No that’s not scientific reasearch, but that should tell you something.

    Share
  34. Number one reason to switch is that windows just blows chunks by comparison.

    Windows has always been a rip-off of Mac, but also including DOS and all the legacy crap.

    No freeware for Mac? Are you kidding me? Peripherals that don’t work wtih Mac? Where?

    Mac rules and will be at 50% userbase in a couple of years at the CURRENT rate of switch.

    Get over the issue, PC users, you aren’t the ONLY game in town any longer. Del key? That is an aberration, get over it. There is no point in TYPE OVER mode, that was a carry over from DOS and character based systems. Windows crowd can’t ever change, and when anything is changed for the better, they WHINE about it.

    Share
  35. I have to take issue with point 5, More Reliability. I have several XP machines and a Macbook Air. I have had TONS of problems with the Air hanging on boot, and crashing after waking back up. Meanwhile I haven’t had a BSOD on XP since SP2 came out.

    I think Vista and pre XP SP2 machines had tons of problems, but XP just works.

    Share
  36. “When was the last time you tried to plug any peripheral in and ran into problems?”

    Ummm, I have a BIG problem syncing my MacBook Pro with my Blackberry 8830. THE primary reason I got the 8830 was because I could tether it to my laptop and use it as a wireless modem anywhere I went. Now, with the Mac, I do not have that luxury, nor have I found the solution.

    Anyone have any suggestions?

    Share
  37. To “not-quite”

    “1. HFS+ is not that great. Don’t believe me? Ask Linus Torvalds”

    HFS+ isn’t “done”. Future versions may be more like Sun’s ZFS. Moreover, HFS+ AS IT STANDS is superior to Windows’ FS, IMHO. How it stands in relation to LINUX? Don’t know. And are yyou looking from the Developer side or the USER side?

    “4. Plug and Play? Great, if you can find a Mac peripheral. And you still have to install drivers.”

    Plenty of peripherals. And I usually DON’T install drivers.

    “5. Reliability? I find XP very good with reliability, and Vista has been outstanding.”

    XP doesn’t fully crash often when a browser hangs, but in my experience, it takes a LONG time to get back to a state where it lets me do anything again.

    To Ben Byrne:

    Agree 100%. Two machines, for slightly more than the cost of one (install Windows via VMWare or Bootcamp on your Mac). This SHOULD be very compelling for a web worker. And the UNIX-level security and stability simply don’t exist in Windows. And it looks like they won’t in Win 7. Maybe in Windows “Midori”, if that ever gets past the vaporware stage. I think it won’t.

    Share
  38. Smart people buy PCs, “cool” people buy Macs.

    Share
  39. Why is it all of the PC people feel so threatened by Macs. It’s just a computer! I’ve used them since 1988 and they work well, but they’re just a computer. If Macs didn’t exist, I would use Windows, which is also just a computer.

    Use what you want, but drop the defensiveness. There are more important things in the world, you know?

    Share
  40. As someone who uses both (and linux) every day — and really has no preference, just as I have no preference of using my Craftsman hammer or my Black&Decker — I’ll say this:

    *There is no pro-Mac argument that cannot be intelligently shredded, and most of them rely entirely on opinion (it’s prettier!) The rest tend to indicate that the author hasn’t used Windows in 10 years or so.

    *This article says, “Much better video and graphics.” But since the hardware is identical (and easier to upgrade on Windows), it relies on a lame “better software” argument, ignoring that the best graphic/movie software is available for both platforms. And I’d hate to ignore the classic: “The Mac OS and Mac machines have been recognized for years as trouncing Windows PCs in these areas” — which years? ’94 and ’95?

    *I would expect a website geared towards professionals to NOT resort to click-trolling. I’ve removed you from my bookmarks.

    Share
  41. @Richard-
    I would tend to believe that Mac users are much more threatened, since they feel the need to constantly post such tripe as this article.

    The OSs are basically identical — ANY argument of one over the other is ridiculous and sad.

    Share
  42. There are ridiculous trolls on here who pretend to know the Mac but who don’t have a clue.

    For example, MUCH easier than a [so-called missing] right click is a two-fingered-tap on the MacBook trackpad.

    Share
  43. I use Windows for work. But that’s because my work is based on the MS platform. I won’t dev inside a vm on a Mac, it’s just not worth it. I need windows, it works, clients pay, the world moves on.
    I go home and relax on the Mac. It’s beautiful to look at, delivers lightning response in all my AV programs, and stays clean.
    Windows pays for my Mac… interesting.

    Share
  44. You are all obviously wrong, and possibly evil.

    BSD is the best operating system. It is faster and better than both Windows and OS X in every possible way. It promotes a healthy coat and teeth, whereas other operating systems clearly cause the deaths of thousands of poor, hungry orphans.

    Share
  45. Bah, everyone knows that the AmigaOS is the best OS ever made in the history of the Universe.

    Share
  46. Ben Byrne:
    Everything on your list, I get for way less with Linux. I’m not even going to go into some religious advocation rant here, if you actually get more work done on a Mac, more power to you. The dumbed down candy-UI has always merely slowed me down, when I frequently have to work on Apple-hardware. YMWV.

    It these “come to our side”-lists are geared more and more toward UI-fluff, and features present in pretty much any non-windows OS, and less at features actually unique to Macs/Apple.

    Apples merits have, and always will, lie in UI/casing-design, beginner-friendly UI and – for those who have money – the all-in-one principle of hardware and software acquisition. For someone like me, with a very tight budget, enough computer skills to not be intimidated when I don’t have the OS hold my hand every step of the way, and the ability to pretty quickly adapt even exotic UI-designs Apples are just a waste of money.

    I aplogoize for the somewhat loaded sentences I use. As I said, I whis this whole OS-evangelism would just stop, but I think we can all agree that this whole thing, and the OS-war in general, are pretty much fueled by Apple users, and some of the more religious *nix users…

    Share
  47. @Richard Why do mac users constantly feel the need to justify themselves and their choice of computer? What’s with the Apple smugness that makes them look down on other PC users? It reminds me of Linux users back in the 90s. Who wants to be associated with that? I don’t. I could give a rat’s but less what computer you use. If it works for you then great. But don’t feel the need to justify your choices to me or the majority of us out here. I like both Mac and Windows. I just don’t care much for Mac users.

    Share
  48. Steve Johnson Friday, August 8, 2008

    An actual file system. Microsoft has been promising a fast, full-featured file system in Windows for years without ever delivering one. WinFS, which was supposed to be a Mac-like, robust file system was planned for Windows Vista, but then shelved. The speed with which I can retrieve anything on my computer with the Mac is a huge advantage.

    This is poorly researched fantasy. While Vista’s new promised FS hasn’t materialized, it’s not like NTFS isn’t better in many respects than Apple’s HFS+ anyway, as NTFS allows for larger files and filesystem level encryption. HFS+ does have some metadata advangates.

    Much better video and graphics. The Mac OS and Mac machines have been recognized for years as trouncing Windows PCs in these areas, but I don’t see this as just a hardware or operating system issue anymore. That’s especially true now that Apple uses Intel processors. It’s the applications I can use on the Mac that have become more robust than their Windows counterparts. Even iMovie is more robust than Windows video editing applications that cost hundreds of dollars.

    You are selectively picking and choosing amongst applications to make your point. Regardless, you are trying to make an application issue a system issue, and ur has nothing to do with it. I think it much more important to note that only the highest margin of Apple’s product line offers great video hardware puts it at an objective dissadvantage.

    True plug-and-play. Mac users, when was the last time you tried to plug any peripheral in and ran into problems? Even after years of Microsoft’s plug-and-play initiatives, I still run into nasty driver issues and incompatibilities. I think the key here is that Apple keeps compatibility simpler for developers and hardware manufacturers.

    This being a problem with windows is VASTLY overstated. It’s mostly limited to low-end poorly supported devices and peripherals and is not the fault of Windows. Try this? pick some random peripheral off the shelf at your local computer store and plug it into your mac. A lot of the time it’s just not going to work because of the absense of drivers.

    More reliability. Macs are more reliable than PCs for several reasons. The operating system is far less prone to crashing. Support is head-and-shoulders above what you get with a PC. And because the user base is smaller than Windows’, Macs and Mac applications are less of a target for hackers.

    The Operating system is not far less prone to crashing. Both are solid provided they don’t have a crappy driver messing up Kernel space. While you’ll see this more often on Windows given the vast amount of devices available, this makes it a platform issue that can be avoided, not an inherent operating system issue.

    Support depends on who you buy from.

    Security by obscurity really isn’t security.

    Share
  49. One machine. Two operating systems. Best of both worlds.

    Share
  50. I think your forgetting that Microsoft is primarily a software company and the Windows is an Operating System.. The point I’m trying to make is that microsoft cannot control all the hardware manufacturers that build machines that run their OS or the peripherals that are made for their OS… this is good and bad for users because A) they get more choices but B) there is a higher risk for compatibility and quality issues. Apple, on the other hand, is a hardware/software company and have tight restrictions and controls set for their OS and it’s peripherals… good luck buying a sub $1000 computer from Apple and good luck trying to find a bevy of upgrade and peripheral options for your computer… you are tied to Apple..

    This whole post is misleading

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post