<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel&#039;s Larrabee Aims to Take on Nvidia and AMD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/08/04/intels-larrabee-aims-to-take-on-nvidia-and-amd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/04/intels-larrabee-aims-to-take-on-nvidia-and-amd/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:10:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FTC Makes Graphic Claim Against Intel &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/04/intels-larrabee-aims-to-take-on-nvidia-and-amd/#comment-142973</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FTC Makes Graphic Claim Against Intel &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16394#comment-142973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] behavior. Much of the FTC complaint centers around Intel&#8217;s alleged attempts to destroy innovation in the graphics market where ironically the company just experienced a huge setback when it delayed its Larrabee graphics [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] behavior. Much of the FTC complaint centers around Intel&#8217;s alleged attempts to destroy innovation in the graphics market where ironically the company just experienced a huge setback when it delayed its Larrabee graphics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Cash-rich Chip Cos. Go Shopping?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/04/intels-larrabee-aims-to-take-on-nvidia-and-amd/#comment-142972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Cash-rich Chip Cos. Go Shopping?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16394#comment-142972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] chips could prove to be likelier buys, however, especially as Intel gears up to release Larrabee, its x86-based graphics chip. (Related Research from GigaOM Pro, subscription required: How 3-D TV Will Go From Hasseloff to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] chips could prove to be likelier buys, however, especially as Intel gears up to release Larrabee, its x86-based graphics chip. (Related Research from GigaOM Pro, subscription required: How 3-D TV Will Go From Hasseloff to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jct</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/04/intels-larrabee-aims-to-take-on-nvidia-and-amd/#comment-142971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jct]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 05:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16394#comment-142971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i believe that this will just be a new integrated graphics card, it will just be better since Intel&#039;s current IGU is somewhat lacking the bare average of power to take on today&#039;s common applications, i mean even Mac switched to Nvidia. OMG!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i believe that this will just be a new integrated graphics card, it will just be better since Intel&#8217;s current IGU is somewhat lacking the bare average of power to take on today&#8217;s common applications, i mean even Mac switched to Nvidia. OMG!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graphics Go Mainstream - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/04/intels-larrabee-aims-to-take-on-nvidia-and-amd/#comment-142970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Graphics Go Mainstream - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16394#comment-142970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 111 million GPUs were shipped, compared with 91 million shipped during the same period last year. Nvidia, Intel and AMD are the top makers of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 111 million GPUs were shipped, compared with 91 million shipped during the same period last year. Nvidia, Intel and AMD are the top makers of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Accelerators: It&#8217;s all about the programming : business&#124;bytes&#124;genes&#124;molecules</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/04/intels-larrabee-aims-to-take-on-nvidia-and-amd/#comment-142969</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Accelerators: It&#8217;s all about the programming : business&#124;bytes&#124;genes&#124;molecules]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16394#comment-142969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Intel&#8217;s Larrabee Aims to Take on Nvidia and AMD [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Intel&#8217;s Larrabee Aims to Take on Nvidia and AMD [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewZela</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/04/intels-larrabee-aims-to-take-on-nvidia-and-amd/#comment-142968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AndrewZela]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16394#comment-142968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adding more multi-core compute is not what we need.

Current trends in microprocessor evolution indicate that more and more applications will become memory-bound and be unable to benefit from the ample compute resources offered by the next generation of computers.

This increasing disparity between a system’s compute capabilities and the available memory bandwidth needed to fully utilize that compute is the real problem.

Until that is solved, we&#039;re not addressing the real bottleneck for improving application performance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding more multi-core compute is not what we need.</p>
<p>Current trends in microprocessor evolution indicate that more and more applications will become memory-bound and be unable to benefit from the ample compute resources offered by the next generation of computers.</p>
<p>This increasing disparity between a system’s compute capabilities and the available memory bandwidth needed to fully utilize that compute is the real problem.</p>
<p>Until that is solved, we&#8217;re not addressing the real bottleneck for improving application performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/04/intels-larrabee-aims-to-take-on-nvidia-and-amd/#comment-142967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16394#comment-142967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry. I retract the previous comment. Apparently Larrabee is just a multicore CPU trying to be a GPU. Well, that does seem like a recipe for failure. I wonder if Nvidia&#039;s Huang knew this all along -- making his anti-Larrabee rant less about bravado/marketing and more about plain incredulity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. I retract the previous comment. Apparently Larrabee is just a multicore CPU trying to be a GPU. Well, that does seem like a recipe for failure. I wonder if Nvidia&#8217;s Huang knew this all along &#8212; making his anti-Larrabee rant less about bravado/marketing and more about plain incredulity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/08/04/intels-larrabee-aims-to-take-on-nvidia-and-amd/#comment-142966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=16394#comment-142966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is certainly a good chance that Larrabee will be a failure, but I don&#039;t think you understand what it is. It is not a multicore CPU trying to do the work of a GPU; it is an actual GPU that just happens to be x86 compatible. Will it actually be a good GPU from a price/performance perspective? We&#039;ll have to wait and see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is certainly a good chance that Larrabee will be a failure, but I don&#8217;t think you understand what it is. It is not a multicore CPU trying to do the work of a GPU; it is an actual GPU that just happens to be x86 compatible. Will it actually be a good GPU from a price/performance perspective? We&#8217;ll have to wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

