<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BT Buys Ribbit for $105 Million</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/bt-buys-ribbit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/bt-buys-ribbit/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 03:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Complete List of Q3 2008 Web, Internet and Tech Acquisitions &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/bt-buys-ribbit/#comment-912267</link>
		<dc:creator>Complete List of Q3 2008 Web, Internet and Tech Acquisitions &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/british-telecom-buys-ribbit/#comment-912267</guid>
		<description>[...] Ribbit is a platform for creating voice-based applications over the Internet. TechCrunch &#124; GigaOm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ribbit is a platform for creating voice-based applications over the Internet. TechCrunch | GigaOm [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why IntelePeer Snagged $18 Million in Funding - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/bt-buys-ribbit/#comment-912111</link>
		<dc:creator>Why IntelePeer Snagged $18 Million in Funding - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/british-telecom-buys-ribbit/#comment-912111</guid>
		<description>[...] are looking at the $105 million Ribbit exit and letting their imagination run wild. But then there aren&#8217;t many suckers like BT around anymore! The company has raised (including this round) a total of $35.5 million since its inception in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are looking at the $105 million Ribbit exit and letting their imagination run wild. But then there aren&#8217;t many suckers like BT around anymore! The company has raised (including this round) a total of $35.5 million since its inception in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CLR XIV : La Cofa - Blog de Vigilancia Tecnológica</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/bt-buys-ribbit/#comment-894918</link>
		<dc:creator>CLR XIV : La Cofa - Blog de Vigilancia Tecnológica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/british-telecom-buys-ribbit/#comment-894918</guid>
		<description>[...] exclusivas hasta ahora de la línea fija o móvil (gestionar el buzon de voz, &#8230;). &#8220;BT Buys Ribbit for $105 Million&#8221; en Gigaom, &#8220;Ribbit! The amphibian of telco voice platforms&#8221; y &#8220;Guest post: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] exclusivas hasta ahora de la línea fija o móvil (gestionar el buzon de voz, &#8230;). &#8220;BT Buys Ribbit for $105 Million&#8221; en Gigaom, &#8220;Ribbit! The amphibian of telco voice platforms&#8221; y &#8220;Guest post: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Lisser</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/bt-buys-ribbit/#comment-894468</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Lisser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/british-telecom-buys-ribbit/#comment-894468</guid>
		<description>I am more than a little late to this post but, much has happened since the Ribbit announcement that makes commenting of interest today. Of course, all of us implicated in the emerging telephony space rejoiced at some level when the deal went firm.  Someone had to go first and no one is complaining about where the initial bar was set. Will BT be able to monetize the acquisition? Anybody's guess, and I can't offer much in that direction as I don't work much in BT's market. 

More interesting to me is that the notion of a voice platform is firmly alive and well.  For 2-3 years now we've called them hosted services and wondered how they would make money. Now, they're platforms (notwithstanding the fact that most if not all are in some way interconnected to a network). And while for some we are still wondering how they will monetize, this is a process.  Three short years ago, even the term hosted was difficult for people to grasp. Now, we don't go to market in any other way.

Since the announcement, other leading 'platform' providers have been busy - coincidentally or not.  Jon Arnold - an 'A' student in this market - recently wrote about Jajah and IfByPhone in the context of the Ribbit deal.  Worth a read at http://voipservices.tmcnet.com/feature/articles/37107-platform-play-updates-solid-proof-points-service-providers.htm

In my opinion, IfByPhone deserves a closer look for those taken by the Ribbit transaction. The two companies have very different histories; and their packaging and go-to-markets differ in many ways. For the moment, Ribbit depended more on developers to commercialize.  IfByPhone - whose platform was built entirely with web developers in mind - is widely available to the developer community yet at the same time they choose to package services that small business can afford, can use and can quickly see benefit from. By doing so, they create market validation, they monetize and they show the development community what can be done.  What is perhaps most impressive - and indicative of the depth of the platform - is how quickly they can enter market segments.  They see a market requirement through their commercial efforts, they package the application and bang the SMB community can jump on.

So while we ponder if BT can take what is truly a platform and monetize it inside their own ecosystem, should we not wonder what it would take for one of our stateside players (ie. Comcast) to make a similar decision? In my opinion, it will take proof of concept and it will take a pure SMB offer. IfByPhone should be watched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am more than a little late to this post but, much has happened since the Ribbit announcement that makes commenting of interest today. Of course, all of us implicated in the emerging telephony space rejoiced at some level when the deal went firm.  Someone had to go first and no one is complaining about where the initial bar was set. Will BT be able to monetize the acquisition? Anybody&#8217;s guess, and I can&#8217;t offer much in that direction as I don&#8217;t work much in BT&#8217;s market. </p>
<p>More interesting to me is that the notion of a voice platform is firmly alive and well.  For 2-3 years now we&#8217;ve called them hosted services and wondered how they would make money. Now, they&#8217;re platforms (notwithstanding the fact that most if not all are in some way interconnected to a network). And while for some we are still wondering how they will monetize, this is a process.  Three short years ago, even the term hosted was difficult for people to grasp. Now, we don&#8217;t go to market in any other way.</p>
<p>Since the announcement, other leading &#8216;platform&#8217; providers have been busy - coincidentally or not.  Jon Arnold - an &#8216;A&#8217; student in this market - recently wrote about Jajah and IfByPhone in the context of the Ribbit deal.  Worth a read at  (<a href="http://voipservices.tmcnet.com/feature/articles/37107-platform-play-updates-solid-proof-points-service-providers.htm" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
<p>In my opinion, IfByPhone deserves a closer look for those taken by the Ribbit transaction. The two companies have very different histories; and their packaging and go-to-markets differ in many ways. For the moment, Ribbit depended more on developers to commercialize.  IfByPhone - whose platform was built entirely with web developers in mind - is widely available to the developer community yet at the same time they choose to package services that small business can afford, can use and can quickly see benefit from. By doing so, they create market validation, they monetize and they show the development community what can be done.  What is perhaps most impressive - and indicative of the depth of the platform - is how quickly they can enter market segments.  They see a market requirement through their commercial efforts, they package the application and bang the SMB community can jump on.</p>
<p>So while we ponder if BT can take what is truly a platform and monetize it inside their own ecosystem, should we not wonder what it would take for one of our stateside players (ie. Comcast) to make a similar decision? In my opinion, it will take proof of concept and it will take a pure SMB offer. IfByPhone should be watched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Africa.Alltop.com - A Little Backstory &#8212; White African</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/bt-buys-ribbit/#comment-892997</link>
		<dc:creator>Africa.Alltop.com - A Little Backstory &#8212; White African</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/british-telecom-buys-ribbit/#comment-892997</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple evangelist back in the day alongside Guy Kawasaki, and was directly involved in the success Ribbit has seen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple evangelist back in the day alongside Guy Kawasaki, and was directly involved in the success Ribbit has seen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squawk Box July 30 &#8212; Alec Saunders SquawkBox</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/bt-buys-ribbit/#comment-891342</link>
		<dc:creator>Squawk Box July 30 &#8212; Alec Saunders SquawkBox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/british-telecom-buys-ribbit/#comment-891342</guid>
		<description>[...] acquisition sparked some interesting commentary &#8212; Om Malik gave it a huge &#8220;yawn&#8221;, asking why it was significant given how few developers they had.  At the other end of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] acquisition sparked some interesting commentary &#8212; Om Malik gave it a huge &#8220;yawn&#8221;, asking why it was significant given how few developers they had.  At the other end of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BT Buys Ribbit for $105 Million (Om Malik/GigaOM) &#124; NewsMeToday</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/bt-buys-ribbit/#comment-891239</link>
		<dc:creator>BT Buys Ribbit for $105 Million (Om Malik/GigaOM) &#124; NewsMeToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/british-telecom-buys-ribbit/#comment-891239</guid>
		<description>[...] $105 Million (Om Malik/GigaOM)     Category: Techmeme &#124;  source article link    Om Malik / GigaOM: BT Buys Ribbit for $105 Million&#160; &#8212;&#160; Will BT Make Ribbit Work?&#160; &#8212; Yes.&#160; Better To Look For Help [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] $105 Million (Om Malik/GigaOM)     Category: Techmeme |  source article link    Om Malik / GigaOM: BT Buys Ribbit for $105 Million&nbsp; &mdash;&nbsp; Will BT Make Ribbit Work?&nbsp; &mdash; Yes.&nbsp; Better To Look For Help [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Between the Lines mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/bt-buys-ribbit/#comment-891223</link>
		<dc:creator>Between the Lines mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/british-telecom-buys-ribbit/#comment-891223</guid>
		<description>[...] BT Buys Ribbit for $105 Million Ryan Stewart: Better RIAs from the Ribbit-BT [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BT Buys Ribbit for $105 Million Ryan Stewart: Better RIAs from the Ribbit-BT [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-07-30 &#124; stuart henshall</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/bt-buys-ribbit/#comment-891219</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-07-30 &#124; stuart henshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/british-telecom-buys-ribbit/#comment-891219</guid>
		<description>[...] BT Buys Ribbit for $105 Million - GigaOM Now that&#8217;s a big price. I think Om&#8217;s right about the business model. (tags: ribbit phone flash api voip) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BT Buys Ribbit for $105 Million - GigaOM Now that&#8217;s a big price. I think Om&#8217;s right about the business model. (tags: ribbit phone flash api voip) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/bt-buys-ribbit/#comment-891207</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/british-telecom-buys-ribbit/#comment-891207</guid>
		<description>@Gary, What is your experience with Ribbit? We weren't happy with the kind of response we were getting from them. Maybe they only support big names :-)

We are building a RIA (flash based) wherein we wanted to integrate flash-based voice communication but didn't get any satisfactory answers on performance, scalability or telecom specific questions from Ribbit. 

So, after some more research, we are now finally building our application on tringme platform after a successful prototype. So far tring me is responding well to our requirements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gary, What is your experience with Ribbit? We weren&#8217;t happy with the kind of response we were getting from them. Maybe they only support big names :-)</p>
<p>We are building a RIA (flash based) wherein we wanted to integrate flash-based voice communication but didn&#8217;t get any satisfactory answers on performance, scalability or telecom specific questions from Ribbit. </p>
<p>So, after some more research, we are now finally building our application on tringme platform after a successful prototype. So far tring me is responding well to our requirements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BT Buys Ribbit for $105 Million - Better RIAs from the Ribbit-BT Acquisition &#124; Enetlive.net- Rich Internet Applications Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/bt-buys-ribbit/#comment-891187</link>
		<dc:creator>BT Buys Ribbit for $105 Million - Better RIAs from the Ribbit-BT Acquisition &#124; Enetlive.net- Rich Internet Applications Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/british-telecom-buys-ribbit/#comment-891187</guid>
		<description>[...] morning Ribbit and BT confirmed previous rumors by announcing an acquisition price of $105 million. I’ve been a big fan of Ribbit since they launched because they made voice a first class citizen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] morning Ribbit and BT confirmed previous rumors by announcing an acquisition price of $105 million. I’ve been a big fan of Ribbit since they launched because they made voice a first class citizen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Slim</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/bt-buys-ribbit/#comment-891182</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Slim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/british-telecom-buys-ribbit/#comment-891182</guid>
		<description>@Senor Grande

Don't forget that RingCentral signed a deal with BT just a few months back. 
RingCentral's customer acquisition costs are probably through the stratosphere and they are competing with J2 Global who has lots more cash (NASDAQ: JCOM). Also, because the barrier to entry for virtual pbx is so low I'dbe willing to bet there are some very high customer churn issues. 
Also, don't forget that GOOG bought Grandcentral. When they relaunch that will be a nail in the coffin for many virtual pbx companies. AND a rumor floating around is that Vonage may be launching a similar virtual pbx service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Senor Grande</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget that RingCentral signed a deal with BT just a few months back.<br />
RingCentral&#8217;s customer acquisition costs are probably through the stratosphere and they are competing with J2 Global who has lots more cash (NASDAQ: JCOM). Also, because the barrier to entry for virtual pbx is so low I&#8217;dbe willing to bet there are some very high customer churn issues.<br />
Also, don&#8217;t forget that GOOG bought Grandcentral. When they relaunch that will be a nail in the coffin for many virtual pbx companies. AND a rumor floating around is that Vonage may be launching a similar virtual pbx service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senor Grande</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/bt-buys-ribbit/#comment-891156</link>
		<dc:creator>Senor Grande</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/british-telecom-buys-ribbit/#comment-891156</guid>
		<description>Have to think that RingCentral will be in play shortly. Lines have become so commoditized that the value now likes in the virtual pbx. 

Prime suitors imo include:

- Cisco
- ATT
- TMobile
- Verizon
- Comcast</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to think that RingCentral will be in play shortly. Lines have become so commoditized that the value now likes in the virtual pbx. </p>
<p>Prime suitors imo include:</p>
<p>- Cisco<br />
- ATT<br />
- TMobile<br />
- Verizon<br />
- Comcast</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/bt-buys-ribbit/#comment-891153</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/british-telecom-buys-ribbit/#comment-891153</guid>
		<description>I would like to know how they came to the $ 105 M valuation. Ribbit is indeed a very creative platform with a tremendous potential, but 100M is high for a company without signoficant revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know how they came to the $ 105 M valuation. Ribbit is indeed a very creative platform with a tremendous potential, but 100M is high for a company without signoficant revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Universal Desktop mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/bt-buys-ribbit/#comment-891128</link>
		<dc:creator>The Universal Desktop mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/british-telecom-buys-ribbit/#comment-891128</guid>
		<description>[...] morning Ribbit and BT confirmed previous rumors by announcing an acquisition price of $105 million. I&#8217;ve been a big fan of Ribbit since they launched because they made voice a first class [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] morning Ribbit and BT confirmed previous rumors by announcing an acquisition price of $105 million. I&#8217;ve been a big fan of Ribbit since they launched because they made voice a first class [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why BT spent $105 million on Ribbit &#171; IT Spot</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/bt-buys-ribbit/#comment-891122</link>
		<dc:creator>Why BT spent $105 million on Ribbit &#171; IT Spot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/07/29/british-telecom-buys-ribbit/#comment-891122</guid>
		<description>[...] GigaOm&#8217;s Om Malik likes the vision, but is skeptical about BT&#8217;s ability to execute.   The 21CN plan included a platform that allowed developers to embed voice into Internet applications. That platform still exists, but one wonders if anyone is using it. So perhaps they had to go out and buy what is essentially a Class Five switch with a pretty Internet interface. Ribbit, as an independent company was able to get some&#8211;not a lot&#8211;of developer interest. I am not sure how BT is going to do that. It is after a telecom operator, who wants to operate like an Internet company. Sure, in a circus you can make a dog walk on two legs as well. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GigaOm&#8217;s Om Malik likes the vision, but is skeptical about BT&#8217;s ability to execute.   The 21CN plan included a platform that allowed developers to embed voice into Internet applications. That platform still exists, but one wonders if anyone is using it. So perhaps they had to go out and buy what is essentially a Class Five switch with a pretty Internet interface. Ribbit, as an independent company was able to get some&#8211;not a lot&#8211;of developer interest. I am not sure how BT is going to do that. It is after a telecom operator, who wants to operate like an Internet company. Sure, in a circus you can make a dog walk on two legs as well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
