<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simplify Your Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/07/18/simplify-your-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/18/simplify-your-work/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: July Roundup for PimpYourWork &#124; money news blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/18/simplify-your-work/#comment-74390</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[July Roundup for PimpYourWork &#124; money news blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 00:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2791#comment-74390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Simplify your workÂ  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Simplify your workÂ  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: July Roundup for PimpYourWork &#124; money news blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/18/simplify-your-work/#comment-74389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[July Roundup for PimpYourWork &#124; money news blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2791#comment-74389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Simplify your work  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Simplify your work  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: British Qualifications2 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; July Roundup for PimpYourWork</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/18/simplify-your-work/#comment-74388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[British Qualifications2 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; July Roundup for PimpYourWork]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2791#comment-74388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Simplify your work  Get more monitor real estate without a second monitor Setting the perfect deadline You don’t need a muse: how to get your work done when you’re not inspired How to reset your body clock [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Simplify your work  Get more monitor real estate without a second monitor Setting the perfect deadline You don’t need a muse: how to get your work done when you’re not inspired How to reset your body clock [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: July Roundup for PimpYourWork</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/18/simplify-your-work/#comment-74387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[July Roundup for PimpYourWork]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2791#comment-74387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Simplify your work  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Simplify your work  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Personal Hack &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top Personal Development Productivity Lifehack Blogs</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/18/simplify-your-work/#comment-74386</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Personal Hack &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top Personal Development Productivity Lifehack Blogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 01:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2791#comment-74386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Web Worker Daily. Great How to articles like this one: Simplify Your Work.  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web Worker Daily. Great How to articles like this one: Simplify Your Work.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Saunders</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/18/simplify-your-work/#comment-74385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barbara Saunders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2791#comment-74385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This may be heresy - one of the things I&#039;ve done to simplify is keep my expense records on paper. I combine freelance work, remote assignments to an agency, and a job. My 1099 clients pay by check, and my expenses are minimal. 12 sheets of paper captures it all!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be heresy &#8211; one of the things I&#8217;ve done to simplify is keep my expense records on paper. I combine freelance work, remote assignments to an agency, and a job. My 1099 clients pay by check, and my expenses are minimal. 12 sheets of paper captures it all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AM Retrow</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/18/simplify-your-work/#comment-74384</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AM Retrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2791#comment-74384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In general simplicity and clarity is best, especially in competitive situations. It is said that Einstein could explain relativity to lay people and even kids, so even the complex and difficult can be simplified. In research grant proposal writing, 2 years of work and preliminary data is included with plans for 5 years of new scientific investigation in 25 pages (now being shortened to 15). If scientific reviewers don&#039;t &quot;get it&quot; in the first pass - often a 15-20 minute read on the airplane - it does not even come up for discussion. It gets trashed. On the other hand if you have a particular client with low self esteem and who is impressed by stuff he/she has difficulty understanding, maybe larding it up with complexity will work. Balance is everything.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In general simplicity and clarity is best, especially in competitive situations. It is said that Einstein could explain relativity to lay people and even kids, so even the complex and difficult can be simplified. In research grant proposal writing, 2 years of work and preliminary data is included with plans for 5 years of new scientific investigation in 25 pages (now being shortened to 15). If scientific reviewers don&#8217;t &#8220;get it&#8221; in the first pass &#8211; often a 15-20 minute read on the airplane &#8211; it does not even come up for discussion. It gets trashed. On the other hand if you have a particular client with low self esteem and who is impressed by stuff he/she has difficulty understanding, maybe larding it up with complexity will work. Balance is everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge Camoes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/18/simplify-your-work/#comment-74383</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jorge Camoes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2791#comment-74383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, Celine, this is a good post but I think you either missed the point or started with the wrong example.

What your friend says is &quot;if I want it to look professional&quot;. This is about perception from the client&#039;s side. Unfortunately the perceived value of your work often depends upon the level of apparent complexity you add.

So, the cynical approach is: simplify your work and then add layers of perceived complexity if that adds value from the client&#039;s point of view.

Now, let me see, how can I follow my own advice?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Celine, this is a good post but I think you either missed the point or started with the wrong example.</p>
<p>What your friend says is &#8220;if I want it to look professional&#8221;. This is about perception from the client&#8217;s side. Unfortunately the perceived value of your work often depends upon the level of apparent complexity you add.</p>
<p>So, the cynical approach is: simplify your work and then add layers of perceived complexity if that adds value from the client&#8217;s point of view.</p>
<p>Now, let me see, how can I follow my own advice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwayne Phillips</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/18/simplify-your-work/#comment-74382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dwayne Phillips]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2791#comment-74382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps I am just getting old and tired, but I find myself often giving the &quot;simplify things&quot; advice to people. Building the kinds of things we build where I work is not easy. We invent things on every project.  There are plenty of technical, managerial, and personnel  challenges. I feel that most people want to add even more most of the time. Please, back off. Get something built that works. Then move on to another iteration to put more into it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I am just getting old and tired, but I find myself often giving the &#8220;simplify things&#8221; advice to people. Building the kinds of things we build where I work is not easy. We invent things on every project.  There are plenty of technical, managerial, and personnel  challenges. I feel that most people want to add even more most of the time. Please, back off. Get something built that works. Then move on to another iteration to put more into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
