<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: British Regulators Prescribe More Fiber for ISPs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/07/08/british-regulators-prescribe-more-fiber-for-isps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/08/british-regulators-prescribe-more-fiber-for-isps/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:25:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jamalystic</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/08/british-regulators-prescribe-more-fiber-for-isps/#comment-887743</link>
		<dc:creator>jamalystic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=14069#comment-887743</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The article you referenced in PCAdvisor mentioned about giving a favourable rate of reture to firms that invest in fibre and i want to believe that government should involve heavily if the notion of a &#039;universal&#039; bandwidth is to be realized as stipulated by this article:FTTH: Coming From a Government Near You( http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=561&amp;doc_id=148317&amp;F_src=flftwo)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article you referenced in PCAdvisor mentioned about giving a favourable rate of reture to firms that invest in fibre and i want to believe that government should involve heavily if the notion of a &#8216;universal&#8217; bandwidth is to be realized as stipulated by this article:FTTH: Coming From a Government Near You( <a href="http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=561&amp;doc_id=148317&amp;F_src=flftwo)" rel="nofollow">http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=561&amp;doc_id=148317&amp;F_src=flftwo)</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/08/british-regulators-prescribe-more-fiber-for-isps/#comment-887696</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=14069#comment-887696</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Paul, thanks for the insight. I admit I am eager to see what they come up with, but if it&#039;s what you&#039;re saying, then yes, we&#039;ve been there in the U.S. and that&#039;s not exciting.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, thanks for the insight. I admit I am eager to see what they come up with, but if it&#8217;s what you&#8217;re saying, then yes, we&#8217;ve been there in the U.S. and that&#8217;s not exciting.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/08/british-regulators-prescribe-more-fiber-for-isps/#comment-887645</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=14069#comment-887645</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Stacey, I think you&#039;ve misunderstood was the regulator was saying.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The likes of BT have had to offer wholesale connectivity services to ISPs because the infrastructure they inherited from public must be opened up on an equal access basis.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There has been much discussion about next-generation networks in the UK with the big providers saying that (i) there isn&#039;t a particularly good FTTx business case except for green field sites (ii) there&#039;s no way they&#039;ll do it if they are forced to open it up to third parties as the return will not be as great.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So all the regulator has done is made a concession on point (ii). There is no guaranteed return for telcos deploying fibre, only that any fibre that is deployed will not forceably be opened up to competitors.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacey, I think you&#8217;ve misunderstood was the regulator was saying.</p>

<p>The likes of BT have had to offer wholesale connectivity services to ISPs because the infrastructure they inherited from public must be opened up on an equal access basis.</p>

<p>There has been much discussion about next-generation networks in the UK with the big providers saying that (i) there isn&#8217;t a particularly good FTTx business case except for green field sites (ii) there&#8217;s no way they&#8217;ll do it if they are forced to open it up to third parties as the return will not be as great.</p>

<p>So all the regulator has done is made a concession on point (ii). There is no guaranteed return for telcos deploying fibre, only that any fibre that is deployed will not forceably be opened up to competitors.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/08/british-regulators-prescribe-more-fiber-for-isps/#comment-887635</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=14069#comment-887635</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It really comes down to how they &quot;guarantee a financial rate of return on fiber rollouts&quot;.  I can only think of a few ways to do that: government subsidies and/or price controls that favour the telco.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You can get that in the US too.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really comes down to how they &#8220;guarantee a financial rate of return on fiber rollouts&#8221;.  I can only think of a few ways to do that: government subsidies and/or price controls that favour the telco.</p>

<p>You can get that in the US too.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/08/british-regulators-prescribe-more-fiber-for-isps/#comment-887601</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=14069#comment-887601</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Vinnie, excellent post. Sad situation. Sigh...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vinnie, excellent post. Sad situation. Sigh&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinnie mirchandani</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/08/british-regulators-prescribe-more-fiber-for-isps/#comment-887583</link>
		<dc:creator>vinnie mirchandani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=14069#comment-887583</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;there you go &quot;unfairly maligning&quot; US telecoms again :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;see&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2008/06/us-telecom-industry-unfairly-maligned.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there you go &#8220;unfairly maligning&#8221; US telecoms again :)</p>

<p>see</p>

<p><a href="http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2008/06/us-telecom-industry-unfairly-maligned.html" rel="nofollow">http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2008/06/us-telecom-industry-unfairly-maligned.html</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
