<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: British Regulators Prescribe More Fiber for ISPs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/07/08/british-regulators-prescribe-more-fiber-for-isps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/08/british-regulators-prescribe-more-fiber-for-isps/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:50:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamalystic</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/08/british-regulators-prescribe-more-fiber-for-isps/#comment-206505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jamalystic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=14069#comment-206505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The article you referenced in PCAdvisor mentioned about giving a favourable rate of reture to firms that invest in fibre and i want to believe that government should involve heavily if the notion of a &#039;universal&#039; bandwidth is to be realized as stipulated by this article:FTTH: Coming From a Government Near You( http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=561&amp;doc_id=148317&amp;F_src=flftwo)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article you referenced in PCAdvisor mentioned about giving a favourable rate of reture to firms that invest in fibre and i want to believe that government should involve heavily if the notion of a &#8216;universal&#8217; bandwidth is to be realized as stipulated by this article:FTTH: Coming From a Government Near You( <a href="http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=561&#038;doc_id=148317&#038;F_src=flftwo" rel="nofollow">http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=561&#038;doc_id=148317&#038;F_src=flftwo</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/08/british-regulators-prescribe-more-fiber-for-isps/#comment-206504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=14069#comment-206504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul, thanks for the insight. I admit I am eager to see what they come up with, but if it&#039;s what you&#039;re saying, then yes, we&#039;ve been there in the U.S. and that&#039;s not exciting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, thanks for the insight. I admit I am eager to see what they come up with, but if it&#8217;s what you&#8217;re saying, then yes, we&#8217;ve been there in the U.S. and that&#8217;s not exciting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/08/british-regulators-prescribe-more-fiber-for-isps/#comment-206503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=14069#comment-206503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stacey, I think you&#039;ve misunderstood was the regulator was saying.

The likes of BT have had to offer wholesale connectivity services to ISPs because the infrastructure they inherited from public must be opened up on an equal access basis.

There has been much discussion about next-generation networks in the UK with the big providers saying that (i) there isn&#039;t a particularly good FTTx business case except for green field sites (ii) there&#039;s no way they&#039;ll do it if they are forced to open it up to third parties as the return will not be as great.

So all the regulator has done is made a concession on point (ii). There is no guaranteed return for telcos deploying fibre, only that any fibre that is deployed will not forceably be opened up to competitors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacey, I think you&#8217;ve misunderstood was the regulator was saying.</p>
<p>The likes of BT have had to offer wholesale connectivity services to ISPs because the infrastructure they inherited from public must be opened up on an equal access basis.</p>
<p>There has been much discussion about next-generation networks in the UK with the big providers saying that (i) there isn&#8217;t a particularly good FTTx business case except for green field sites (ii) there&#8217;s no way they&#8217;ll do it if they are forced to open it up to third parties as the return will not be as great.</p>
<p>So all the regulator has done is made a concession on point (ii). There is no guaranteed return for telcos deploying fibre, only that any fibre that is deployed will not forceably be opened up to competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/08/british-regulators-prescribe-more-fiber-for-isps/#comment-206502</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=14069#comment-206502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It really comes down to how they &quot;guarantee a financial rate of return on fiber rollouts&quot;.  I can only think of a few ways to do that: government subsidies and/or price controls that favour the telco.

You can get that in the US too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really comes down to how they &#8220;guarantee a financial rate of return on fiber rollouts&#8221;.  I can only think of a few ways to do that: government subsidies and/or price controls that favour the telco.</p>
<p>You can get that in the US too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/08/british-regulators-prescribe-more-fiber-for-isps/#comment-206501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=14069#comment-206501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vinnie, excellent post. Sad situation. Sigh...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vinnie, excellent post. Sad situation. Sigh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinnie mirchandani</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/07/08/british-regulators-prescribe-more-fiber-for-isps/#comment-206500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vinnie mirchandani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=14069#comment-206500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[there you go &quot;unfairly maligning&quot; US telecoms again :)

see

http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2008/06/us-telecom-industry-unfairly-maligned.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there you go &#8220;unfairly maligning&#8221; US telecoms again :)</p>
<p>see</p>
<p><a href="http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2008/06/us-telecom-industry-unfairly-maligned.html" rel="nofollow">http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2008/06/us-telecom-industry-unfairly-maligned.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

