<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Venture Capital, Angels or Bootstrap?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let&#8217;s Create a New Tech Startup Myth &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/#comment-204349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s Create a New Tech Startup Myth &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13743#comment-204349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] lot cheaper to start up a business and easier to connect to an audience. Maybe the ideal technology startup doesn&#8217;t need venture capital. Maybe it can be bootstrapped or backed by angels. Maybe the ideal technology startup isn&#8217;t [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lot cheaper to start up a business and easier to connect to an audience. Maybe the ideal technology startup doesn&#8217;t need venture capital. Maybe it can be bootstrapped or backed by angels. Maybe the ideal technology startup isn&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finding the right VC to fund your dream &#171; excapite</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/#comment-204348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finding the right VC to fund your dream &#171; excapite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13743#comment-204348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Gigaom: VC, Angels or Bootstrap? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gigaom: VC, Angels or Bootstrap? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Financing your startups &#124; Neumannsol Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/#comment-204347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Financing your startups &#124; Neumannsol Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13743#comment-204347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Great article on Gigaom by Anand Rajaraman on how to finance your startups: Venture Capital, Angels or Bootstrap? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Great article on Gigaom by Anand Rajaraman on how to finance your startups: Venture Capital, Angels or Bootstrap? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Platt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/#comment-204346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Platt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13743#comment-204346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, the market for finding and matching private capital is not efficient, and can often be ineffective.  The Speed Venture Summit(TM), New England&#039;s leading speed-pitching event, is developed and designed by investors to overcome these challenges.  Next scheduled for October 28, 2009, SVS features founders and other execs privately pitching their growth stories in person to reps from six of the region&#039;s top private capital investors, including angel groups and seed- and early-stage VCs.  For more information, please visit:  www.speedventuresummit.org]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the market for finding and matching private capital is not efficient, and can often be ineffective.  The Speed Venture Summit(TM), New England&#8217;s leading speed-pitching event, is developed and designed by investors to overcome these challenges.  Next scheduled for October 28, 2009, SVS features founders and other execs privately pitching their growth stories in person to reps from six of the region&#8217;s top private capital investors, including angel groups and seed- and early-stage VCs.  For more information, please visit:  <a href="http://www.speedventuresummit.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.speedventuresummit.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Startups Don&#8217;t Need the Valley Unless They Need VC</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/#comment-204345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tech Startups Don&#8217;t Need the Valley Unless They Need VC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13743#comment-204345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] less about where you start a company, than an effort to reclaim the word &#8220;startup&#8221; for entrepreneurs who bootstrap their technology business — in or outside of the Valley. Many of these companies get less PR (they can&#8217;t always [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] less about where you start a company, than an effort to reclaim the word &#8220;startup&#8221; for entrepreneurs who bootstrap their technology business — in or outside of the Valley. Many of these companies get less PR (they can&#8217;t always [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where to raise money: bootstrap, angels, or venture capital? &#171; BZ Notes!</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/#comment-204344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Where to raise money: bootstrap, angels, or venture capital? &#171; BZ Notes!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13743#comment-204344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] on. But here I want to link to an interesting extract from an article by Ananad Rajaraman on GigaOm. Read on: Where to raise funding is an important decision every startup founder has to make. The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on. But here I want to link to an interesting extract from an article by Ananad Rajaraman on GigaOm. Read on: Where to raise funding is an important decision every startup founder has to make. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vectorpedia</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/#comment-204343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vectorpedia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13743#comment-204343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an excellent post on the details of financing startups...........angel investors seem to be a great alternative way to finance a project.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent post on the details of financing startups&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..angel investors seem to be a great alternative way to finance a project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VC Fund Raising Manual - 4 The Pitch &#171; Specific Marketing</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/#comment-204342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VC Fund Raising Manual - 4 The Pitch &#171; Specific Marketing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13743#comment-204342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Venture Capital, Angels or Bootstrap?   Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Under The RadarHow Venture Capital Thwarts InnovationThe death of Silicon Valley. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Venture Capital, Angels or Bootstrap?   Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Under The RadarHow Venture Capital Thwarts InnovationThe death of Silicon Valley. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Product Guy&#8217;s Weekend Reading (July 4, 2008) &#171; The Product Guy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/#comment-204341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Product Guy&#8217;s Weekend Reading (July 4, 2008) &#171; The Product Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13743#comment-204341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] your weekend enjoyment, are some highlights from my recent reading, for you. On Starting Up&#8230;http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/A look into the financing decision between venture capital, angels and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your weekend enjoyment, are some highlights from my recent reading, for you. On Starting Up&#8230;<a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/A" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/A</a> look into the financing decision between venture capital, angels and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishneil</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/#comment-204340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krishneil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13743#comment-204340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were no IPO&#039;s in Silicon Valley in the last business quarter.

In a future post, could you discuss what ramifications this might have for startups and ventures looking for funding.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were no IPO&#8217;s in Silicon Valley in the last business quarter.</p>
<p>In a future post, could you discuss what ramifications this might have for startups and ventures looking for funding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VC Fund Raising Manual &#171; Specific Marketing</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/#comment-204339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VC Fund Raising Manual &#171; Specific Marketing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13743#comment-204339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Venture Capital, Angels or Bootstrap? [via Zemanta] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Venture Capital, Angels or Bootstrap? [via Zemanta] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/#comment-204338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13743#comment-204338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The article raises some good points, but if you&#039;re a founder who&#039;s goal isn&#039;t just to sell the company later on or go public, then VC and angel investing is not a good choice.

One of the main reasons I&#039;m in the process of launching a startup is to express my ideas, profit from them... and NOT WORK FOR ANYONE ELSE. When a VC or angel enters the picture, they provide the money, so for the most part, they make the ultimate decisions. And if you truly enjoy your business, you don&#039;t want to see control switched to an acquiring company or outside shareholders.

&quot;My advice is to bootstrap until you can clear either the angel or the VC bar, but no longer.&quot;

I would disagree with that statement. My advice would be to bootstrap until your company turns a profit (which should be a lot quicker than any of the other two options). Of course you would do that responsibly and know when it&#039;s not financially smart to continue to personally finance a failing entity.

In all, both VC and Angel investing are great alternatives, but for someone like me who is passionate about what I do, and likes having control of something i created, and not the intention to just create something and sell it, bootstrapping has more positives than negatives.

Maybe I&#039;m a traditionalist, but if I need money for financing, my first option will be bank loan/credit card, and just hire smart people to move my company in the right direction without giving up too much control.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article raises some good points, but if you&#8217;re a founder who&#8217;s goal isn&#8217;t just to sell the company later on or go public, then VC and angel investing is not a good choice.</p>
<p>One of the main reasons I&#8217;m in the process of launching a startup is to express my ideas, profit from them&#8230; and NOT WORK FOR ANYONE ELSE. When a VC or angel enters the picture, they provide the money, so for the most part, they make the ultimate decisions. And if you truly enjoy your business, you don&#8217;t want to see control switched to an acquiring company or outside shareholders.</p>
<p>&#8220;My advice is to bootstrap until you can clear either the angel or the VC bar, but no longer.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would disagree with that statement. My advice would be to bootstrap until your company turns a profit (which should be a lot quicker than any of the other two options). Of course you would do that responsibly and know when it&#8217;s not financially smart to continue to personally finance a failing entity.</p>
<p>In all, both VC and Angel investing are great alternatives, but for someone like me who is passionate about what I do, and likes having control of something i created, and not the intention to just create something and sell it, bootstrapping has more positives than negatives.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m a traditionalist, but if I need money for financing, my first option will be bank loan/credit card, and just hire smart people to move my company in the right direction without giving up too much control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anand Rajaraman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/#comment-204337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anand Rajaraman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13743#comment-204337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jenkins: Unfortunately, the market for early-stage funding is not as efficient as you believe. Venture capitalists (or angels, or anyone else for that matter) are not always able to predict which ideas lead to successful companies. This means many successful ideas never get funded. It also means that many bad ideas do get funded. The earlier the stage of the company, the more inefficient the market. Which is why it&#039;s useful for entrepreneurs to know who to approach for funding: angels or VCs.

If your startup doesn&#039;t need funding, and you can bootstrap your way to success, more power to you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jenkins: Unfortunately, the market for early-stage funding is not as efficient as you believe. Venture capitalists (or angels, or anyone else for that matter) are not always able to predict which ideas lead to successful companies. This means many successful ideas never get funded. It also means that many bad ideas do get funded. The earlier the stage of the company, the more inefficient the market. Which is why it&#8217;s useful for entrepreneurs to know who to approach for funding: angels or VCs.</p>
<p>If your startup doesn&#8217;t need funding, and you can bootstrap your way to success, more power to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/#comment-204336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[james]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13743#comment-204336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking forward to a time when we can add the 4th category, peer-sourcing your startup. I expect the three above to stay, but a few new ways to start appearing that will offer entrepreneurs alternatives to smarts in business advice and money to get started.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to a time when we can add the 4th category, peer-sourcing your startup. I expect the three above to stay, but a few new ways to start appearing that will offer entrepreneurs alternatives to smarts in business advice and money to get started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeybutt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/#comment-204335</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[monkeybutt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 01:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13743#comment-204335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post!

Unfortunately, I don&#039;t have an MBA from Stanford, my team doesn&#039;t include any seasoned executives from successful or fashionable companies (such as Google), I don&#039;t know any reincarnated angels (that know and respect me from a prior life). I&#039;m not aware of the existence of an angel that has prior expertise in in my field and is comfortable evaluating much of anything involving any risk - with or without all the dots connected.

And even more unfortunately (perhaps this is where my lack of an MBA from Stanford is letting me down), I thought a &quot;business&quot; was supposed to generate a steady stream of revenue and profits.

And, crap, I never imagined that it would be hard, or take any effort on my part to start a business.

We&#039;ll, I&#039;m an idiot, so as soon as I burn the SUV and sell the kids to the onion farm down the street, I&#039;ll just go put a bullet in my head.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!</p>
<p>Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t have an MBA from Stanford, my team doesn&#8217;t include any seasoned executives from successful or fashionable companies (such as Google), I don&#8217;t know any reincarnated angels (that know and respect me from a prior life). I&#8217;m not aware of the existence of an angel that has prior expertise in in my field and is comfortable evaluating much of anything involving any risk &#8211; with or without all the dots connected.</p>
<p>And even more unfortunately (perhaps this is where my lack of an MBA from Stanford is letting me down), I thought a &#8220;business&#8221; was supposed to generate a steady stream of revenue and profits.</p>
<p>And, crap, I never imagined that it would be hard, or take any effort on my part to start a business.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll, I&#8217;m an idiot, so as soon as I burn the SUV and sell the kids to the onion farm down the street, I&#8217;ll just go put a bullet in my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenkins</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/15/venture-capital-angels-or-bootstrap/#comment-204334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jenkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 23:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13743#comment-204334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anand,

Respectfully, I think you&#039;re very wrong and misguided. VC dollars try to flow to the opportunities that show the most promise for Return on Capital. Once in a while a great project is passed over purely due to terms, meaning the founder has impossible expectations or something, but most of the time good projects get funded on some level. Findory was not something worthy of funding because it didn&#039;t have a chance of returning a good return. Period.

You&#039;re buying into the spin my friend.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anand,</p>
<p>Respectfully, I think you&#8217;re very wrong and misguided. VC dollars try to flow to the opportunities that show the most promise for Return on Capital. Once in a while a great project is passed over purely due to terms, meaning the founder has impossible expectations or something, but most of the time good projects get funded on some level. Findory was not something worthy of funding because it didn&#8217;t have a chance of returning a good return. Period.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re buying into the spin my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

