<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Late rumor shows new developer Mac; is this for real?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/06/09/late-rumor-shows-new-developer-mac-is-this-for-real/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/09/late-rumor-shows-new-developer-mac-is-this-for-real/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:52:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Mediati</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/09/late-rumor-shows-new-developer-mac-is-this-for-real/#comment-328154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Mediati]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3471#comment-328154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I caught &quot;Apps&quot; after I submitted this article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I caught &#8220;Apps&#8221; after I submitted this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/09/late-rumor-shows-new-developer-mac-is-this-for-real/#comment-328153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3471#comment-328153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that I actually looked at the link, it says leave WINDOWS behind. The copy in the article is wrong. It&#039;s still implausible, however, because Apps is capitalized. It&#039;s not a proper noun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that I actually looked at the link, it says leave WINDOWS behind. The copy in the article is wrong. It&#8217;s still implausible, however, because Apps is capitalized. It&#8217;s not a proper noun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/09/late-rumor-shows-new-developer-mac-is-this-for-real/#comment-328152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3471#comment-328152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Leave your apps behind. Build your apps for OS X.”? That makes no sense. No way Apple marketing wrote that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Leave your apps behind. Build your apps for OS X.”? That makes no sense. No way Apple marketing wrote that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/09/late-rumor-shows-new-developer-mac-is-this-for-real/#comment-328151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3471#comment-328151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find it interesting that the Mac section is selected but the address bar is not visible, keeping the address a secret.  I&#039;m not sure if Apple uploads the pages before annoucements and then hyperlinks then after they have been announced, but history has shown that the pages are uploaded after the annoucement.

http://www.apple.com/macpro/ takes you to the mac pro&#039;s homepage but
http://www.apple.com/macfusion/ and
http://www.apple.com/fusion/ both give you a 404.  Only time will tell but that machine could also be used for a AppleTV replacement.

It looks like a photoshopped TimeCapsule to be honest, the LED is bigger than that of a MacMini.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that the Mac section is selected but the address bar is not visible, keeping the address a secret.  I&#8217;m not sure if Apple uploads the pages before annoucements and then hyperlinks then after they have been announced, but history has shown that the pages are uploaded after the annoucement.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/macpro/" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/macpro/</a> takes you to the mac pro&#8217;s homepage but<br />
<a href="http://www.apple.com/macfusion/" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/macfusion/</a> and<br />
<a href="http://www.apple.com/fusion/" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/fusion/</a> both give you a 404.  Only time will tell but that machine could also be used for a AppleTV replacement.</p>
<p>It looks like a photoshopped TimeCapsule to be honest, the LED is bigger than that of a MacMini.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/09/late-rumor-shows-new-developer-mac-is-this-for-real/#comment-328150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3471#comment-328150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m thinking VMWare doesn&#039;t mind so much if bundled VMWare Fusion is what makes this thing tick, and that makes perfect sense, otherwise is this a Boot Camp only solution. I don&#039;t think so.

The other thing that lends credibility to this rumor is the big fat &quot;who cares&quot; factor. This is far from exciting out here in consumer rumor land but makes incredible sense for cross platform iPhone developers.

Count my vote for this being a VMWare preloaded machine, if it&#039;s even real.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking VMWare doesn&#8217;t mind so much if bundled VMWare Fusion is what makes this thing tick, and that makes perfect sense, otherwise is this a Boot Camp only solution. I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>The other thing that lends credibility to this rumor is the big fat &#8220;who cares&#8221; factor. This is far from exciting out here in consumer rumor land but makes incredible sense for cross platform iPhone developers.</p>
<p>Count my vote for this being a VMWare preloaded machine, if it&#8217;s even real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/06/09/late-rumor-shows-new-developer-mac-is-this-for-real/#comment-328149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3471#comment-328149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I imagine it&#039;s a dev taking a picture with his cell phone.

Screenshot would require saving and emailing which I would assume is not allowed and easily traceable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine it&#8217;s a dev taking a picture with his cell phone.</p>
<p>Screenshot would require saving and emailing which I would assume is not allowed and easily traceable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
