Comments on: AMD Pushes Puma to Maul Intel http://gigaom.com/2008/06/04/amd-pushes-puma-to-beat-intel/ Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Sarki Sozleri http://gigaom.com/2008/06/04/amd-pushes-puma-to-beat-intel/#comment-203389 Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:09:11 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=13653#comment-203389 Puma is a platform, not just a processor. Just like Spider it comprises the CPU, GPU and the chipset. All those working together yields a complete picture, and goes toe to toe with Intel.

]]> By: Stacey Higginbotham http://gigaom.com/2008/06/04/amd-pushes-puma-to-beat-intel/#comment-203388 Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:37:05 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=13653#comment-203388 Hi Wesley! I’ll make the lead clearer, but I do note that Puma is a platform rather than a single chip.

TechPR, the Puma platform looks to be slightly more power hungry than Montevina but does appear to have better HD graphics and a faster PCI interface than Intel has planned for Montevina initially. The main difference should be in how HD graphics look on laptops with each platform.

]]> By: Wesley Faulkner http://gigaom.com/2008/06/04/amd-pushes-puma-to-beat-intel/#comment-203387 Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:30:13 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=13653#comment-203387 Puma is a platform, not just a processor. Just like Spider it comprises the CPU, GPU and the chipset. All those working together yields a complete picture, and goes toe to toe with Intel.

]]> By: Tech PR http://gigaom.com/2008/06/04/amd-pushes-puma-to-beat-intel/#comment-203386 Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:33:58 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=13653#comment-203386 Other than graphics processing power, power consumption, multi core and compactness are also some of the strengths of intel mobile processors. how does this puma processor from AMD compare with its peers from Intel

]]>