<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Have You to Thank for This</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:17:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: True Ventures &#187; GigaOm&#8217;s Content Credible</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879809</link>
		<dc:creator>True Ventures &#187; GigaOm&#8217;s Content Credible</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879809</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] was recently ranked by tech reporters as one of the top three sites for tech news, as well as the most credible for [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was recently ranked by tech reporters as one of the top three sites for tech news, as well as the most credible for [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Woodard Maderazo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879687</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Woodard Maderazo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879687</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Very much deserved!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very much deserved!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879612</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 14:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879612</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations GigaOm team. It&#039;s a testament to all of your hard work.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations GigaOm team. It&#8217;s a testament to all of your hard work.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dempsey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879560</link>
		<dc:creator>Dempsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 10:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879560</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;45%??? That&#039;s it? To me that says these &quot;beat reporters&quot; and &quot;Tech reporters&quot; aren&#039;t really paying attention to the new media. After coming to GigaOm through links on other sites (and noticing the quality of the articles), I checked Om&#039;s background, then added the RSS (i.e. my list of credible news sources). Reading the content and knowing the background should signal to anyone that the site is credible.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While it&#039;s a well deserved compliment to Om &amp; da crew, it&#039;s a collective, back-handed slap to web journalism.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;IMHO, FWIW.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>45%??? That&#8217;s it? To me that says these &#8220;beat reporters&#8221; and &#8220;Tech reporters&#8221; aren&#8217;t really paying attention to the new media. After coming to GigaOm through links on other sites (and noticing the quality of the articles), I checked Om&#8217;s background, then added the RSS (i.e. my list of credible news sources). Reading the content and knowing the background should signal to anyone that the site is credible.</p>

<p>While it&#8217;s a well deserved compliment to Om &amp; da crew, it&#8217;s a collective, back-handed slap to web journalism.</p>

<p>IMHO, FWIW.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879455</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879455</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@ Allen,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your kind words. appreciate it. You are doing a great job as well.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Allen,</p>

<p>Thanks for your kind words. appreciate it. You are doing a great job as well.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879454</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879454</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well deserved!  Great source of info.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well deserved!  Great source of info.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879453</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879453</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@ Omfut,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Stay tuned and we will have some surprises for you&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Best&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Omfut,</p>

<p>Stay tuned and we will have some surprises for you</p>

<p>Best</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allen stern</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879448</link>
		<dc:creator>allen stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879448</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats GigaOm team!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats GigaOm team!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omfut</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879445</link>
		<dc:creator>omfut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879445</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Om et al:
   Congratulations! I always believed in the stuff what you guys had to say. Though I read other blogs (I write my own too), when it comes to credible insights, I always turn back to gigaom. Wish you guys cover more startup news and insights on the market trend. How about coming up with a separate section for startups news, trends, market analysis etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All that said, i wouldn’t be surprised if GigaOm is acquired by some big media company. Wish this happens.You guys deserve it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers,
Omfut&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Om et al:
   Congratulations! I always believed in the stuff what you guys had to say. Though I read other blogs (I write my own too), when it comes to credible insights, I always turn back to gigaom. Wish you guys cover more startup news and insights on the market trend. How about coming up with a separate section for startups news, trends, market analysis etc.</p>

<p>All that said, i wouldn’t be surprised if GigaOm is acquired by some big media company. Wish this happens.You guys deserve it.</p>

<p>Cheers,
Omfut</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sidharth</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879418</link>
		<dc:creator>Sidharth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879418</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Om&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Congratulations for this . I think that your journalistic background helped in this as you are a little more careful about publishing stories than &quot;attorney turned bloggers&quot; :) (I love techcrunch also). But for me the fact that you are from a journalistic background makes your stories more researched and more genuine. You also seem to have specialists like Liz at Newteevee and Stacey at GigaOM writing on their subjects. 1 person writing on different subjects make it a little less genuine&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Om</p>

<p>Congratulations for this . I think that your journalistic background helped in this as you are a little more careful about publishing stories than &#8220;attorney turned bloggers&#8221; :) (I love techcrunch also). But for me the fact that you are from a journalistic background makes your stories more researched and more genuine. You also seem to have specialists like Liz at Newteevee and Stacey at GigaOM writing on their subjects. 1 person writing on different subjects make it a little less genuine</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879415</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879415</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, after Gizmodo&#039;s stunt at CES and shutting off monitors during presentations, people are looking less and less at bloggers as serious journalists. I want news, not fluff or irrelevant posts. Sure, it may be funny and popular, but it fails.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, after Gizmodo&#8217;s stunt at CES and shutting off monitors during presentations, people are looking less and less at bloggers as serious journalists. I want news, not fluff or irrelevant posts. Sure, it may be funny and popular, but it fails.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
