<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Have You to Thank for This</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: True Ventures &#187; GigaOm&#8217;s Content Credible</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879809</link>
		<dc:creator>True Ventures &#187; GigaOm&#8217;s Content Credible</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879809</guid>
		<description>[...] was recently ranked by tech reporters as one of the top three sites for tech news, as well as the most credible for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was recently ranked by tech reporters as one of the top three sites for tech news, as well as the most credible for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Woodard Maderazo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879687</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Woodard Maderazo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879687</guid>
		<description>Very much deserved!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very much deserved!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879612</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 14:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879612</guid>
		<description>Congratulations GigaOm team. It's a testament to all of your hard work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations GigaOm team. It&#8217;s a testament to all of your hard work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dempsey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879560</link>
		<dc:creator>Dempsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 10:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879560</guid>
		<description>45%??? That's it? To me that says these "beat reporters" and "Tech reporters" aren't really paying attention to the new media. After coming to GigaOm through links on other sites (and noticing the quality of the articles), I checked Om's background, then added the RSS (i.e. my list of credible news sources). Reading the content and knowing the background should signal to anyone that the site is credible.

While it's a well deserved compliment to Om &#38; da crew, it's a collective, back-handed slap to web journalism.

IMHO, FWIW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>45%??? That&#8217;s it? To me that says these &#8220;beat reporters&#8221; and &#8220;Tech reporters&#8221; aren&#8217;t really paying attention to the new media. After coming to GigaOm through links on other sites (and noticing the quality of the articles), I checked Om&#8217;s background, then added the RSS (i.e. my list of credible news sources). Reading the content and knowing the background should signal to anyone that the site is credible.</p>
<p>While it&#8217;s a well deserved compliment to Om &amp; da crew, it&#8217;s a collective, back-handed slap to web journalism.</p>
<p>IMHO, FWIW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879455</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879455</guid>
		<description>@ Allen, 

Thanks for your kind words. appreciate it. You are doing a great job as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Allen, </p>
<p>Thanks for your kind words. appreciate it. You are doing a great job as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879454</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879454</guid>
		<description>Well deserved!  Great source of info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well deserved!  Great source of info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879453</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879453</guid>
		<description>@ Omfut, 

Stay tuned and we will have some surprises for you 

Best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Omfut, </p>
<p>Stay tuned and we will have some surprises for you </p>
<p>Best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allen stern</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879448</link>
		<dc:creator>allen stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879448</guid>
		<description>Congrats GigaOm team!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats GigaOm team!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omfut</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879445</link>
		<dc:creator>omfut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879445</guid>
		<description>Hi Om et al:
   Congratulations! I always believed in the stuff what you guys had to say. Though I read other blogs (I write my own too), when it comes to credible insights, I always turn back to gigaom. Wish you guys cover more startup news and insights on the market trend. How about coming up with a separate section for startups news, trends, market analysis etc.

All that said, i wouldn’t be surprised if GigaOm is acquired by some big media company. Wish this happens.You guys deserve it.

Cheers,
Omfut</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Om et al:<br />
   Congratulations! I always believed in the stuff what you guys had to say. Though I read other blogs (I write my own too), when it comes to credible insights, I always turn back to gigaom. Wish you guys cover more startup news and insights on the market trend. How about coming up with a separate section for startups news, trends, market analysis etc.</p>
<p>All that said, i wouldn’t be surprised if GigaOm is acquired by some big media company. Wish this happens.You guys deserve it.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Omfut</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sidharth</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879418</link>
		<dc:creator>Sidharth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879418</guid>
		<description>Hi Om

Congratulations for this . I think that your journalistic background helped in this as you are a little more careful about publishing stories than "attorney turned bloggers" :) (I love techcrunch also). But for me the fact that you are from a journalistic background makes your stories more researched and more genuine. You also seem to have specialists like Liz at Newteevee and Stacey at GigaOM writing on their subjects. 1 person writing on different subjects make it a little less genuine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Om</p>
<p>Congratulations for this . I think that your journalistic background helped in this as you are a little more careful about publishing stories than &#8220;attorney turned bloggers&#8221; :) (I love techcrunch also). But for me the fact that you are from a journalistic background makes your stories more researched and more genuine. You also seem to have specialists like Liz at Newteevee and Stacey at GigaOM writing on their subjects. 1 person writing on different subjects make it a little less genuine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/we-have-you-to-thank-for-this/#comment-879415</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13529#comment-879415</guid>
		<description>Well, after Gizmodo's stunt at CES and shutting off monitors during presentations, people are looking less and less at bloggers as serious journalists. I want news, not fluff or irrelevant posts. Sure, it may be funny and popular, but it fails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, after Gizmodo&#8217;s stunt at CES and shutting off monitors during presentations, people are looking less and less at bloggers as serious journalists. I want news, not fluff or irrelevant posts. Sure, it may be funny and popular, but it fails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
