<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter&#8217;s New VC Round: Red Hot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:44:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PE HUB &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-897169</link>
		<dc:creator>PE HUB &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-897169</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Competition is fierce for Twitter&#8217;s new VC round. I think I may finally give in to the micro-blogging service [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Competition is fierce for Twitter&#8217;s new VC round. I think I may finally give in to the micro-blogging service [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Could Twitter Be Growing Up? at So It&#8217;s Come To This:</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-893452</link>
		<dc:creator>Could Twitter Be Growing Up? at So It&#8217;s Come To This:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-893452</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Twitter - something that, from what most people can tell hasn&#8217;t really begun despite rounds of [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter &#8211; something that, from what most people can tell hasn&#8217;t really begun despite rounds of [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter-Summize Deal Confirmed - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-888613</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter-Summize Deal Confirmed - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-888613</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] of the company to acquire Summize. My sources peg Twitter&#8217;s value at around $80 million. If you remember I had reported about $15 million in new funding earlier this summer. As part of the deal, Summize [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the company to acquire Summize. My sources peg Twitter&#8217;s value at around $80 million. If you remember I had reported about $15 million in new funding earlier this summer. As part of the deal, Summize [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: With Summize, Twitter To Buy a Clue - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-887455</link>
		<dc:creator>With Summize, Twitter To Buy a Clue - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 05:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-887455</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] deal would be a good move by Twitter, and would be putting some of its recently acquired $15 million in VC funding to decent use as it would help the company get hold of of a business model. Here is why. Most [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] deal would be a good move by Twitter, and would be putting some of its recently acquired $15 million in VC funding to decent use as it would help the company get hold of of a business model. Here is why. Most [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter &#171; Analyst Views Weekly</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-882240</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter &#171; Analyst Views Weekly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-882240</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the messaging service has achieved a valuation, &#8220;pegged at way north of $70 million,&#8221; according to leading tech blogger Om Malik who also notes that its most recent round of funding raised the company another $15 [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the messaging service has achieved a valuation, &#8220;pegged at way north of $70 million,&#8221; according to leading tech blogger Om Malik who also notes that its most recent round of funding raised the company another $15 [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter &#124; Blogs @ Northern Light</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-882239</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter &#124; Blogs @ Northern Light</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-882239</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the messaging service has achieved a valuation, &#8220;pegged at way north of $70 million,&#8221; according to leading tech blogger Om Malik who also notes that its most recent round of funding raised the company another $15 [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the messaging service has achieved a valuation, &#8220;pegged at way north of $70 million,&#8221; according to leading tech blogger Om Malik who also notes that its most recent round of funding raised the company another $15 [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Series B Funding: Done. Raises $15 MM - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-879512</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Series B Funding: Done. Raises $15 MM - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 05:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-879512</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...]    I spent most of the day digging up more information on Twitter and its Series B round of funding that I reported last night. The update is that Twitter reached an agreement with investors today to raise $15 million in [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]    I spent most of the day digging up more information on Twitter and its Series B round of funding that I reported last night. The update is that Twitter reached an agreement with investors today to raise $15 million in [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-879424</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-879424</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think these Vulture Captial groups really know what they&#039;re doing.  Twitter has a large enough following that they can start rolling the ads soon.  Then, the VCs can really cash out!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think these Vulture Captial groups really know what they&#8217;re doing.  Twitter has a large enough following that they can start rolling the ads soon.  Then, the VCs can really cash out!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-879406</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-879406</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i love twitter and i&#039;m on there (as passingnotes)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;...but even more interesting given this money-raising round: have you been following yonkly.com? it&#039;s an open source clone written in MSFT_friendly code (as in, no ruby, not java) by emad ibrahim...it could pave the way for corporate implementation on the scale of drupal if it comes together correctly..&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;maybe you guys could interview him, or cover him on ostatic? it&#039;s open source...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love twitter and i&#8217;m on there (as passingnotes)</p>

<p>&#8230;but even more interesting given this money-raising round: have you been following yonkly.com? it&#8217;s an open source clone written in MSFT_friendly code (as in, no ruby, not java) by emad ibrahim&#8230;it could pave the way for corporate implementation on the scale of drupal if it comes together correctly..</p>

<p>maybe you guys could interview him, or cover him on ostatic? it&#8217;s open source&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Future of Online Advertising - Clearspring Raises Big Round - Social Media and Social Advertising &#171; Furrier.org - Business &#38; Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-879397</link>
		<dc:creator>Future of Online Advertising - Clearspring Raises Big Round - Social Media and Social Advertising &#171; Furrier.org - Business &#38; Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-879397</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] million. Why because it&#8217;s about infrastructure and analytics. Online advertising is changing. Just look at Twitter. Clearspring has a bigger monetization opportunity than Twitter yet Twitter has... Clearspring has a deeper [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] million. Why because it&#8217;s about infrastructure and analytics. Online advertising is changing. Just look at Twitter. Clearspring has a bigger monetization opportunity than Twitter yet Twitter has&#8230; Clearspring has a deeper [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 080520 Daily Links: Five You Must Read (For Recruiters) &#124; johnsumser.com: Recruiting News and Views</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-879389</link>
		<dc:creator>080520 Daily Links: Five You Must Read (For Recruiters) &#124; johnsumser.com: Recruiting News and Views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 16:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-879389</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Twitter: Something Is Technically Wrong even though the money is coming. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter: Something Is Technically Wrong even though the money is coming. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie LeBreton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-879342</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie LeBreton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-879342</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Om,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think you meant Summize(.com), not Summarize(.com).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Darn, spell-checker!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Eddie&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Om,</p>

<p>I think you meant Summize(.com), not Summarize(.com).</p>

<p>Darn, spell-checker!</p>

<p>-Eddie</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-879316</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 09:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-879316</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;way north of $70 million&quot;? Wow. I love Twitter, but unless I am missing something, that seems a bit overvalued. The business model question continues to lurk and I personally wonder if it&#039;s got the legs to get out of geekdom and into the mainstream. We&#039;ll see...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;way north of $70 million&#8221;? Wow. I love Twitter, but unless I am missing something, that seems a bit overvalued. The business model question continues to lurk and I personally wonder if it&#8217;s got the legs to get out of geekdom and into the mainstream. We&#8217;ll see&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The battle to fund Twitter &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-879313</link>
		<dc:creator>The battle to fund Twitter &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 08:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/twitters-new-vc-round-red-hot/#comment-879313</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] a new round of capital as interest around the site (and arguably the site itself) explodes. Tonight GigaOM&#8217;s Om Malik reports that the site has not finalized a $15-20 million round as was previously rumored, but instead is in [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a new round of capital as interest around the site (and arguably the site itself) explodes. Tonight GigaOM&#8217;s Om Malik reports that the site has not finalized a $15-20 million round as was previously rumored, but instead is in [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
