<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qualcomm Backs Femtocell Maker, ip.access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/qualcomm-backs-femtocell-maker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/qualcomm-backs-femtocell-maker/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 3G Femtocells Gain Clarity on Standardised Network Architecture &#171; Real Wireless Weblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/qualcomm-backs-femtocell-maker/#comment-882374</link>
		<dc:creator>3G Femtocells Gain Clarity on Standardised Network Architecture &#171; Real Wireless Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13528#comment-882374</guid>
		<description>[...] Qualcomm Backs Femtocell Maker, ip.access [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Qualcomm Backs Femtocell Maker, ip.access [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Market update for week of 19 May &#171; 3G In The Home</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/qualcomm-backs-femtocell-maker/#comment-880136</link>
		<dc:creator>Market update for week of 19 May &#171; 3G In The Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 09:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13528#comment-880136</guid>
		<description>[...] was some entertaining speculation about Qualcomm&#8217;s motivation.  GigaOM notes that Qualcomm has previously highlighted potential problems with femtocell interference, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was some entertaining speculation about Qualcomm&#8217;s motivation.  GigaOM notes that Qualcomm has previously highlighted potential problems with femtocell interference, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
