<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qualcomm Backs Femtocell Maker, ip.access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/qualcomm-backs-femtocell-maker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/qualcomm-backs-femtocell-maker/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:16:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slow Wired Broadband Could Choke LTE Femtocells</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/qualcomm-backs-femtocell-maker/#comment-202030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Slow Wired Broadband Could Choke LTE Femtocells]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13528#comment-202030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] bad news for startups such as ip.access and Ubiquisys, which are banking on femtocells. The biggest driver for 4G femtocells may have to do [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bad news for startups such as ip.access and Ubiquisys, which are banking on femtocells. The biggest driver for 4G femtocells may have to do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3G Femtocells Gain Clarity on Standardised Network Architecture &#171; Real Wireless Weblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/qualcomm-backs-femtocell-maker/#comment-202029</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3G Femtocells Gain Clarity on Standardised Network Architecture &#171; Real Wireless Weblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13528#comment-202029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Qualcomm Backs Femtocell Maker, ip.access [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Qualcomm Backs Femtocell Maker, ip.access [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Market update for week of 19 May &#171; 3G In The Home</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/21/qualcomm-backs-femtocell-maker/#comment-202028</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Market update for week of 19 May &#171; 3G In The Home]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 09:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13528#comment-202028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] was some entertaining speculation about Qualcomm&#8217;s motivation.  GigaOM notes that Qualcomm has previously highlighted potential problems with femtocell interference, and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was some entertaining speculation about Qualcomm&#8217;s motivation.  GigaOM notes that Qualcomm has previously highlighted potential problems with femtocell interference, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

