<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roku Lives to Make Netflix Set-top Boxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/05/19/roku-netflix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/19/roku-netflix/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:15:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaSean</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/19/roku-netflix/#comment-201817</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LaSean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 00:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13494#comment-201817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Libran Lover

The movie studios haven&#039;t licensed the rest of the catalog for streaming use.

Would you feel better if it was $17 per month and the box was free? [$9 for basic Netflix plan + ($99 Roku box / 12 Months) = $17.25 per month]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Libran Lover</p>
<p>The movie studios haven&#8217;t licensed the rest of the catalog for streaming use.</p>
<p>Would you feel better if it was $17 per month and the box was free? [$9 for basic Netflix plan + ($99 Roku box / 12 Months) = $17.25 per month]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libran Lover</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/19/roku-netflix/#comment-201816</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Libran Lover]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 23:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13494#comment-201816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Om wrote: &quot;If Netflix wants to have an impact in the market, it has beef up its library and at the same time make the box free for Netflix DVD subscribers.&quot;

Amen to that, Om. I&#039;d even be okay with signing up for a 1 year contract if Netflix streams ALL its movies online and gives the box for free! What is keeping them from streaming all their movies anyway?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om wrote: &#8220;If Netflix wants to have an impact in the market, it has beef up its library and at the same time make the box free for Netflix DVD subscribers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amen to that, Om. I&#8217;d even be okay with signing up for a 1 year contract if Netflix streams ALL its movies online and gives the box for free! What is keeping them from streaming all their movies anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/19/roku-netflix/#comment-201815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 21:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13494#comment-201815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe the next Apple TV should actually be a TV -- basically an iMac with a bigger screen, but wimpier computer bits. I&#039;d think 37&quot; would be the right size for the initial offering. The success of LCD at the expense of better value DLP shows that people are willing to pay extra for better looking and that&#039;s something Apple does very well. I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if they could get $1,500 for a 37&quot; model and given that&#039;s more than the cost of a 37&quot; LCD plus a current-model Apple TV, that would be a very healthy profit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the next Apple TV should actually be a TV &#8212; basically an iMac with a bigger screen, but wimpier computer bits. I&#8217;d think 37&#8243; would be the right size for the initial offering. The success of LCD at the expense of better value DLP shows that people are willing to pay extra for better looking and that&#8217;s something Apple does very well. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if they could get $1,500 for a 37&#8243; model and given that&#8217;s more than the cost of a 37&#8243; LCD plus a current-model Apple TV, that would be a very healthy profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mullings</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/19/roku-netflix/#comment-201814</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Mullings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 18:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13494#comment-201814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Om, I too believe that consumers do not want another set-top box. I have Comcast digital cable and love On-demand but pay-per-view is expensive. I simply see Comcast launching a tiered on-demand service for movies - different price points allow a specific number of rentals per month (Netflix on-demand basically).

Adding the functionality into TVs like LG however does have potential and I see that really taking off. I just don&#039;t see the movie companies agreeing to a Napster-like &quot;1 price/unlimited streams&quot; model in the long-run. They do it now because they don&#039;t want to make the mistakes of the music industry...but...$9.99 and stream as much as I want for the month?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om, I too believe that consumers do not want another set-top box. I have Comcast digital cable and love On-demand but pay-per-view is expensive. I simply see Comcast launching a tiered on-demand service for movies &#8211; different price points allow a specific number of rentals per month (Netflix on-demand basically).</p>
<p>Adding the functionality into TVs like LG however does have potential and I see that really taking off. I just don&#8217;t see the movie companies agreeing to a Napster-like &#8220;1 price/unlimited streams&#8221; model in the long-run. They do it now because they don&#8217;t want to make the mistakes of the music industry&#8230;but&#8230;$9.99 and stream as much as I want for the month?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
