Should you download Firefox 3 Release Candidate 1

Our sister blog, OStatic has put Firefox 3 Release Candidate 1 through the paces and seem to like what they see. They like the speed but hate the lack of extensions support. Mike at WebWorkerDaily writes “One of the best features is one of the least flashy: the new location bar. If you have mixed feelings, and looking for a clear opinion, check out this indepth review.

Comments (6)

Rating: 56% Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
Print

6 comments so far

May 18th, 2008
8:21 AM PT
Chris said:

I am happy with Firefox 3 Beta 5, once they have all the extensions then I will download it. Hope they make the extensions independent of the versions.

May 18th, 2008
9:46 AM PT
Justin Thorp said:

Despite the lack of extension support, I’ve been using versions of Firefox 3 for a while now and haven’t looked back. It’s just SOOO much more stable then 2.

May 18th, 2008
9:50 AM PT
Om Malik said:

@ Justin

I agree. Much fewer memory leaks on Mac as well.

May 18th, 2008
11:18 AM PT
daikokuzyuu said:

I havent tried the FF3RC1 yet, but on the beta5, I used this extensions called “Nightly Tester Tool” It allows me to override any compatibility problems that are said to exist, and so, all my extensions work fine, even if they say they arent “compatible” with FF3B5.

May 18th, 2008
12:45 PM PT
Andrew B said:

I’ve started using RC1 as my main browser on XP and it works like a charm, I installed the Nightly Tester Tools, force-enabled all my extensions and the only couple that I’ve had to disable are Firebug and Foxmarks. They haven’t crashed the browser or anything - but obviously with the architecture changes they don’t currently work :)

May 18th, 2008
4:13 PM PT

I’m using RC1 for OSX right now. Not sure about the awesome bar, I use the address bar almost exclusively on FF2 (very few bookmarks) and I love it. This new one has some visual noise which is a little distracting when trying to decide if FF has pick the correct url for me.

Page load and render speed is definitely better than FF2, but Safari 3.11 is the bar FF must compete against in that department. Initial impression is that Safari is still faster, nothing scientific, but I’ve felt myself waiting for FF3 while Safari is so fast I don’t usually notice any delays.

I will still use FF2 for my daily development work - unfortunately ;)

Leave a Comment

Get the comments RSS feed, instant notification of new comments

Most Comments

10 Reasons Enterprises Aren’t Ready to Trust the Cloud
Stacey Higginbotham, July 1, 43 comments
Inside Microsoft’s Internet Infrastructure & Its Plans For The Future
Om Malik, June 30, 25 comments
Bandwidth Barons Want More Money for Fewer Bytes
Allan Leinwand, July 3, 16 comments
Why No One Will Replace Bill & Steve
Om Malik, June 27, 15 comments
10 of the Biggest Platform Development Mistakes
Marty Abbott and Michael Fisher, June 30, 15 comments
Close
E-mail It