<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft, Yahoo Back On &#8212; or Not</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/05/18/microsoft-yahoo-back-on-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/18/microsoft-yahoo-back-on-or-not/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:16:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Icahn Done Squatting on Yahoo&#8217;s Board</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/18/microsoft-yahoo-back-on-or-not/#comment-201692</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl Icahn Done Squatting on Yahoo&#8217;s Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13472#comment-201692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for &#8220;acting so responsibly&#8221; in conjunction with the search transaction with Microsoft that he advocated.  Icahn&#8217;s resignation was to be expected in the wake of Yahoo and Microsoft inking their [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for &#8220;acting so responsibly&#8221; in conjunction with the search transaction with Microsoft that he advocated.  Icahn&#8217;s resignation was to be expected in the wake of Yahoo and Microsoft inking their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gossip Guys: The Microsoft-Yahoo Saga - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/18/microsoft-yahoo-back-on-or-not/#comment-201691</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gossip Guys: The Microsoft-Yahoo Saga - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13472#comment-201691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] when a teenager (let&#8217;s call him Jerry Yang) might get a best friend (maybe call him Carl Icahn) to call another friend (say, Steve Ballmer)? With Yang sitting silently on the line, the goal [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when a teenager (let&#8217;s call him Jerry Yang) might get a best friend (maybe call him Carl Icahn) to call another friend (say, Steve Ballmer)? With Yang sitting silently on the line, the goal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft, Yahoo Back On — or Not &#124; Om Malik &#124; Voices &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/18/microsoft-yahoo-back-on-or-not/#comment-201690</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Microsoft, Yahoo Back On — or Not &#124; Om Malik &#124; Voices &#124; AllThingsD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 07:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13472#comment-201690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Read the rest of this post    Print  all_things_di220:http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080520/microsoft-yahoo-back-on-%e2%80%94-or-not/  Sphere Comment  Tagged: Carl Icahn, GigaOm, Om Malik, Voices, Yahoo, Microsoft &#124; permalink [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this post    Print  all_things_di220:<a href="http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080520/microsoft-yahoo-back-on-%e2%80%94-or-not/" rel="nofollow">http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080520/microsoft-yahoo-back-on-%e2%80%94-or-not/</a>  Sphere Comment  Tagged: Carl Icahn, GigaOm, Om Malik, Voices, Yahoo, Microsoft | permalink [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Thacker</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/18/microsoft-yahoo-back-on-or-not/#comment-201689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Thacker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 01:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13472#comment-201689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Why would Ichan put up a billion dollars on a big questionable company as Yahoo! unless MS whispered to him they would buy Yahoo!&lt;/em&gt;

Huh?  This theory makes no sense.  MS made the offer to Yahoo before Icahn started buying.  He bought once the Yahoo board declined the offer.  It doesn&#039;t take any sort of special knowledge or collusion to decide that that the rest of the Yahoo shareholders might want to take a 72% premium over their shares that was MS&#039;s original offer.  A proxy fight in that sort of situation, when Yahoo&#039;s board has turned down such a massive offer, is a trivially easy thing to think of without any involvement on MS&#039;s part.  What it does take is a some knowledge and experience in mounting proxy fights, a willingness to do so, and a lot of cash to sink into buying enough to wage one effectively.

He doesn&#039;t need MSFT paying him directly to make a killing on this.  All he needs is for shares that he bought in the twenties, along with the rest of Yahoo, for the $33/share that has already been offered.  YHOO is trading below $28 *right now*, even with lots of speculation that he&#039;ll succeed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Why would Ichan put up a billion dollars on a big questionable company as Yahoo! unless MS whispered to him they would buy Yahoo!</em></p>
<p>Huh?  This theory makes no sense.  MS made the offer to Yahoo before Icahn started buying.  He bought once the Yahoo board declined the offer.  It doesn&#8217;t take any sort of special knowledge or collusion to decide that that the rest of the Yahoo shareholders might want to take a 72% premium over their shares that was MS&#8217;s original offer.  A proxy fight in that sort of situation, when Yahoo&#8217;s board has turned down such a massive offer, is a trivially easy thing to think of without any involvement on MS&#8217;s part.  What it does take is a some knowledge and experience in mounting proxy fights, a willingness to do so, and a lot of cash to sink into buying enough to wage one effectively.</p>
<p>He doesn&#8217;t need MSFT paying him directly to make a killing on this.  All he needs is for shares that he bought in the twenties, along with the rest of Yahoo, for the $33/share that has already been offered.  YHOO is trading below $28 *right now*, even with lots of speculation that he&#8217;ll succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracking The Microsoft/Yahoo! Deal - 05.19.08 &#171; YaGooSoft</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/18/microsoft-yahoo-back-on-or-not/#comment-201688</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracking The Microsoft/Yahoo! Deal - 05.19.08 &#171; YaGooSoft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13472#comment-201688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Microsoft, Yahoo Back On, Or Not [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft, Yahoo Back On, Or Not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GSA Technology Council &#187; Microsoft not yet through with Yahoo?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/18/microsoft-yahoo-back-on-or-not/#comment-201687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GSA Technology Council &#187; Microsoft not yet through with Yahoo?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13472#comment-201687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] appears the Yahoo deal is not yet done. Om Malik seems to believe that Carl Icahn has a plan, but that it will be difficult for the two together to assault [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] appears the Yahoo deal is not yet done. Om Malik seems to believe that Carl Icahn has a plan, but that it will be difficult for the two together to assault [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/18/microsoft-yahoo-back-on-or-not/#comment-201686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13472#comment-201686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/080519/yahoo_microsoft.html?.v=6

&quot;The software giant&#039;s move to court Yahoo was likely to prompt the Icahn to press Yahoo to further pursue an alliance with Google, a person familiar with the billionaire investor&#039;s thinking told Reuters on Sunday.&quot;

That&#039;s not what you would call a &quot;MSFT put Icahn upto mischief&quot; view.  Not debating here - just counterpoints of people who have watched the Icahn raids over the years!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/080519/yahoo_microsoft.html?.v=6" rel="nofollow">http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/080519/yahoo_microsoft.html?.v=6</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The software giant&#8217;s move to court Yahoo was likely to prompt the Icahn to press Yahoo to further pursue an alliance with Google, a person familiar with the billionaire investor&#8217;s thinking told Reuters on Sunday.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you would call a &#8220;MSFT put Icahn upto mischief&#8221; view.  Not debating here &#8211; just counterpoints of people who have watched the Icahn raids over the years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/18/microsoft-yahoo-back-on-or-not/#comment-201685</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 13:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13472#comment-201685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft/Ichan theory:

1) MS has already returned to the table 5 days after saying they would move on and go another direction.

2) MS includes the following statement in the new non-merger talks:

&quot;Microsoft is not proposing to make a new bid to acquire all of Yahoo at this time, but reserves the right to reconsider that alternative depending on future developments and discussions that may take place with Yahoo or discussions with shareholders of Yahoo or Microsoft or with other third parties,&quot; the company said in its statement.&quot;

3) Ichan sinks over a billion dollars into Yahoo!, a company that has tremendous risk associated with it without MS. Ichan&#039;s stock purchases without insider knowledge that MS will buy Yahoo! is highly questionable.

IMO, this is Microsoft&#039;s easiest and cheapest way to wage a hostile takeover.  &quot;Hire&quot; Ichan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft/Ichan theory:</p>
<p>1) MS has already returned to the table 5 days after saying they would move on and go another direction.</p>
<p>2) MS includes the following statement in the new non-merger talks:</p>
<p>&#8220;Microsoft is not proposing to make a new bid to acquire all of Yahoo at this time, but reserves the right to reconsider that alternative depending on future developments and discussions that may take place with Yahoo or discussions with shareholders of Yahoo or Microsoft or with other third parties,&#8221; the company said in its statement.&#8221;</p>
<p>3) Ichan sinks over a billion dollars into Yahoo!, a company that has tremendous risk associated with it without MS. Ichan&#8217;s stock purchases without insider knowledge that MS will buy Yahoo! is highly questionable.</p>
<p>IMO, this is Microsoft&#8217;s easiest and cheapest way to wage a hostile takeover.  &#8220;Hire&#8221; Ichan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/18/microsoft-yahoo-back-on-or-not/#comment-201684</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13472#comment-201684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OM - while plausible - who in their right mind wants Icahn for a friend (or even arm-length partner).  The man writes his own rules of engagement - in fact what is more plausible - MSFT walked away because they sniffed out Icahn coming the way of Yahoo.  Think about that one GURU.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OM &#8211; while plausible &#8211; who in their right mind wants Icahn for a friend (or even arm-length partner).  The man writes his own rules of engagement &#8211; in fact what is more plausible &#8211; MSFT walked away because they sniffed out Icahn coming the way of Yahoo.  Think about that one GURU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/18/microsoft-yahoo-back-on-or-not/#comment-201683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 04:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13472#comment-201683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surely, the stockholders must want the door to remain open. It will take significant change at Yahoo to get it moving in the right direction again.   If this change weren&#039;t so personal for Yang, he could take the deal and be off vacationing on a private island, enjoying his money and dictating his book.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely, the stockholders must want the door to remain open. It will take significant change at Yahoo to get it moving in the right direction again.   If this change weren&#8217;t so personal for Yang, he could take the deal and be off vacationing on a private island, enjoying his money and dictating his book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/18/microsoft-yahoo-back-on-or-not/#comment-201682</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13472#comment-201682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Rick, You are not alone. I have been thinking about it, and well Carl is known to *walk* away smelling of &quot;bucks.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Rick, You are not alone. I have been thinking about it, and well Carl is known to *walk* away smelling of &#8220;bucks.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/18/microsoft-yahoo-back-on-or-not/#comment-201681</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13472#comment-201681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Am I the only one who proposes Microsoft &quot;hired&quot; Ichan to do this.  Why would Ichan put up a billion dollars on a big questionable company as Yahoo! unless MS whispered to him they would buy Yahoo!  Carl&#039;s payday comes on sale.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who proposes Microsoft &#8220;hired&#8221; Ichan to do this.  Why would Ichan put up a billion dollars on a big questionable company as Yahoo! unless MS whispered to him they would buy Yahoo!  Carl&#8217;s payday comes on sale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

